Conditioned changes in appetitive and consummatory responses to flavors paired with oral or nutrient reinforcement among adult rats

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 603-610

  Myers, Kevin P ^a   Hall, W G ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Appetitive behavior; Consummatory behavior; Development; Flavor preferences; Pavlovian conditioning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLAVOR; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SMELLING; SWEETNESS;

EID: 0034026105     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00209-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Capaldi E.D. Conditioned food preferences. Medin D.L. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 28. 1992;Academic Press, New York.
2. Fedorchak P.M. The nature and strength of caloric conditioning. Bouton M.E., Fanselow M.S. Learning, Motivation, and Cognition. 1997;American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
3. Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned. Proc Nutr Soc. 54:1995;419-427.
4. Craig W. Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts. Biol Bull. 34:1918;91-107.
5. Davis J.D. The microstructure of ingestive behavior. Ann NY Acad Sci. 575:1989;106-119.
6. Hall W.G. The ontogeny of ingestive behavior. changing control of components in the feeding sequence Stricker E.M. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, vol. 10. 1990;77-123 Plenum Press, New York.
7. Timberlake W. The functional organization of appetitive behavior. behavior systems and learning Zeiler M.D., Harzem P. Advances in Analysis of Behavior, vol. 3. 1983;Wiley, New York.
8. Myers K.P., Hall W.G. Evidence that oral and nutrient reinforcers differentially condition appetitive and consummatory responses to flavors. Physiol Behav. 64:1998;493-500.
9. Warwick Z.S., Bowen K.J., Synowski S.J. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories. cross-nutrient comparisons Physiol Behav. 62:1997;1319-1324.
10. Warwick Z.S., Weingarten H.P. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety. implications for interpreting two-bottle tests Physiol Behav. 60:1996;711-715.
11. Van Vort W., Smith G.P. The relationships between the positive reinforcing and satiating effects of a meal in the rat. Physiol Behav. 30:1983;279-284.
12. Van Vort W., Smith G.P. Sham feeding experience produces a conditioned increase of meal size. Appetite. 9:1987;21-29.
13. Weingarten H.P., Kulikovsky O.T. Taste-to-postingestive consequence conditioning. is the rise in sham feeding with repeated experience a learning phenomenon? Physiol Behav. 45:1989;471-476.
14. Hayward L. The role of oral and postingestional cues in the conditioning of taste preferences based on differing caloric density and caloric outcome in weanling and mature rats. Anim Learn Behav. 11:1983;325-331.
15. Hinderliter C.F., Misanin J.R. Weanling and senescent rats process simultaneously presented odor and taste differently than young adults. Behav Neural Biol. 49:1988;112-117.
16. Perez C., Lucas F., Sclafani A. Increased flavor acceptance and preference conditioned by the postingestive actions of glucose. Physiol Behav. 64:1998;483-492.
17. Breslin P.A., Davidson T.L., Grill H.J. Conditioned reversal of reactions to normally avoided tastes. Physiol Behav. 47:1990;535-538.
18. Grill H.J., Norgren R. The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Res. 143:1978;263-279.
19. Hall W.G. The ontogeny of feeding in rats. I. Ingestive and behavioral responses to oral infusions J Comp Physiol Psychol. 93:1979;977-1000.
20. Davis J.D., Perez M.C. The acquired control of ingestive behavior in the rat by flavor-associated postingestional stimulation. Physiol Behav. 54:1993;1221-1226.
21. Agmo A., Marroquin E. Role of gustatory and postingestive actions of sweeteners in the generation of positive affect as evaluated by place preference conditioning. Appetite. 29:1997;269-289.
22. Myers K.P., Arnold H.M., Hall W.G. Sensitization of ingestive responding in preweanling rats. time course and specificity Behav Neurosci. 111:1997;413-423.
23. Hall W.G., Bryan T.E. The ontogeny of feeding in rats. IV. Taste development as measured by intake and behavioral responses to oral infusions of sucrose and quinine J Comp Physiol Psychol. 95:1981;240-251.
24. Phifer C.B., Browde J.A., Hall W.G. Ontogeny of glucose inhibition of independent ingestion in preweanling rats. Brain Res Bull. 17:1986;673-679.
25. Swithers S.E., Hall W.G. A nutritive control of independent ingestion in rat pups emerges by nine days of age. Physiol Behav. 46:1989;873-879.
26. Johanson I.B., Hall W.G. Appetitive conditioning in neonatal rats. conditioned orientation to a novel odor Dev Psychobiol. 15:1982;379-397.
27. Johanson I.B., Hall W.G., Polefrone J.M. Appetitive conditioning in neonatal rats. conditioned ingestive responding to stimuli paired with oral infusions of milk Dev Psychobiol. 17:1984;357-381.
28. Rudy J.W., Hyson R.L. Consummatory response conditioning to an auditory stimulus in neonatal rats. Behav Neural Biol. 34:1982;209-214.
29. Sullivan R.M., Hall W.G. Reinforcers in infancy. classical conditioning using stroking or intra-oral infusions of milk as UCS Dev Psychobiol. 21:1988;215-223.
30. Booth D.A., Mather P., Fuller J. Starch content of ordinary foods associatively conditions human appetite and satiation, indexed by intake and eating pleasantness of starch-paired flavours. Appetite. 3:1982;163-184.
31. Fedorchak P.M., Bolles R.C. Hunger enhances the expression of calorie- but not taste-mediated conditioned flavor preferences. J Exp Psychol. 13:1987;73-79. [Anim Behav Proc].