The Content Coverage of Clinical Classifications

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 224-233

  Chute, Christopher G ^a   Cohn, Simon P ^b   Campbell, Keith E ^c   Oliver, Diane E ^c   Campbell, James R ^d  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; THERAPY;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSIS; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; TERMINOLOGY; THERAPEUTICS; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 57349200750     PISSN: 10806040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96310636     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Graunt J. Natural and Political Observations Made upon the Bills of Mortality. London, 1662. Republished by The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1939.
2. Greenwood M. Medical Statistics from Graunt to Farr. Part I. Biometrika. 1941;32:101-7.
3. Anderson JR (ed). Efficiency in hospital indexing of the coding system of the international statistical/classification and standard nomenclature of diseases and operations, a report of the collaborative study conducted by the American Hospital Association. J Am Assoc Med Rec Librarians. 1959; June:95-129.
4. Côté RA. Ending classification versus nomenclature controversy. Med Inf (Lond). 1983;8(1):1-4.
5. Medicare Hospital Information, 1988-1990. ISBN 0-16-037885-0. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992 (55 Volumes).
6. SAS/AF Users Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1988.
7. International Classification of Diseases: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death (9th Revision). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1977.
8. Read Codes File Structure Version 3: Overview and Technical Description. Woodgate, Leicestershire, UK: NHS Centre for Coding and Classification, 1993.
9. O'Neil M, Payne C, Read J. Read Codes Version 3: A User Led Terminology. Methods Inf Med. 1995;34:187-92.
10. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the Unified Medical Language System. SCAMC Proc. 1989:475-80.
11. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine, 1993.
12. Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. JAMIA. 1994;1:35-50.
13. Evans DA, Cimino JJ, Hersh WR, et al. Toward a medical-concept representation language. JAMIA. 1994;1:207-17.
14. Cimino JJ. Controlled medical vocabulary construction: methods from the Canon Group. JAMIA. 1994;1:296-7.
15. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-9.
16. Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, et al. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:249-60.
17. Romano PS, Mark DH; Bias in the coding of hospital discharge data and its implications for quality assessment. Med Care. 1994;32:81-90.
18. Green J, Wintfeld N. How accurate are hospital discharge data for evaluating effectiveness of care? Med Care. 1993; 31:719-31.
19. Hartz AJ, Guse C, Sigmann P, Krakauer H, Goldman RS, Hagen TC. Severity of illness measures derived from the Uniform Clinical Data Set (UCDSS). Med Care. 1994;32: 881-901.
20. Chute CG, Atkin GE, Ihrke DM. An empirical evaluation of concept capture by clinical classifications. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O (eds). Geneva, Switzerland: Proceedings of MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992;1469-74.
21. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? JAMIA. 1994;1:61-74.
22. Cimino JJ. Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the Unified Medical Language System. SCAMC Proc. 1991:199-203.
23. Huff SM, Warner HR. A comparison of Meta-1 and HELP terms: implications for clinical data. SCAMC Proc. 1990: 166-9.
24. Campbell JR, Kallenberg GA, Sherrick RC. The clinical utility of META: an analysis for hypertension. SCAMC Proc. 1992:397-401.
25. Campbell JR, Payne TH. A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. SCAMC Proc. 1994:201-5.
26. Friedman C. The UMLS coverage of clinical radiology. SCAMC Proc. 1992:309-13.
27. Zielstorff RD, Cimino C, Barnet GO, Hassan L, Blewett DR. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Meta-thesaurus: a pilot study. SCAMC Proc. 1992:392-6.
28. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), Vol. 1-3. Ann Arbor, MI: Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, 1993.
29. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1992, pre-release.
30. Côté RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL, Beckett RS. SNOMED International. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists, 1994.
31. Read J. Read clinical classification. BMJ. 1990;301:45.
32. Unified Medical Language System, 4th Experimental Edition, Version 1.3, Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine, 1993.
33. Kirschner CG, Burkett RC, Coy JJA, et al (eds). Physician's Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 1993.
34. NANDA Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 1992-1993. Philadelphia: North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, 1992.