Paediatric hearing screening in the community: A comparison of outcomes from transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emission measures

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 83-92

  Shi, Shasha ^a   Kei, Joseph ^a   Murdoch, Bruce ^a   McPherson, Bradley ^a   Smyth, Veronica ^a   Latham, Simon ^b   Loscher, Jennifer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Children; Community health; Hearing; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; CHILD HEALTH CARE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033885952     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503900424499     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069-76.
2. Bray P, Kemp DT. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191-204.
3. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed Psy Measurement 1960; 20: 37-46.
4. Dirckx JJ, Daemers K, Somers T, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ. Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672-9.
5. Gaskill SA, Brown AM. Comparing the level of the acoustic distortion product 2f1-f2 with behavioural threshold audiograms from normal-hearing and hearing impaired ears. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 397-407.
6. Glattke TJ, Pafitis IA, Cummiskey C, Herer GR. Identification of hearing loss in children and young adults using measures of transient otoacoustic emission reproducibility. Am J Audiol 1995; 4: 71-86.
7. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman B, Beauchaine KL, Kaminski JR, Peters J, Schulte L, Jesteadt W. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639-48.
8. Harris FP, Probst R. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 399-405.
9. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220-9.
10. Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997; 36: 61-71.
11. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions in perspective. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. New York: Thieme, 1997; 1-21.
12. McPherson B, Smyth V. Hearing screening for school children with otitis media using otoacoustic emission measures. Asia Pac J Sp Lang Hear 1997; 2: 69-82.
13. McPherson B, Kei J, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Feasibility of community-based hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Public Health 1998; 112: 147-52.
14. Norton SJ, Rubel EW. Active and passive ADP components in mammalian and avian ears. In: Dallos P, Geisler CD, Matthews JW, Ruggero MA, Steele CR, editors. Mechanics and biophysics of hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
15. Rhoades K, McPherson B, Smyth V, Kei J, Baglioni A. Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 450-62.
16. Stover L, Gorga MP, Neely ST, Montoya D. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 956-67.
17. White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 18-29.