The impact of milk-derived unconditioned and conditioned negative feedback on the microstructure of ingestive behavior

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 70, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 279-285

  Davis, John D ^a   Smith, Gerard P ^a   Singh, Bramdeo ^a   McCann, Daniel P ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Licking behavior; Microstructure of licking; Oropharyngeal stimulation; Satiation; Sham feeding

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INGESTION; LICKING; MALE; MILK; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; OROPHARYNX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SATIETY; STIMULATION;

EID: 0033830734     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00263-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Davis J.D., Smith G.P., Singh B., McCann D.P. Increase in intake with sham feeding experience is concentration dependent. Am J Physiol. 277:1999;R565-R571.
2. Davis J.D., Smith G.P., Singh B. The type of negative feedback controlling sucrose ingestion depends on sucrose concentration. Am J Physiol. 278:2000;R383-R389.
3. Davis J.D. A model for the control of ingestion - 20 years later. Morrison A., Fluharty S. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, Vol 17. 1998;127-173 Academic Press, New York.
4. Davis J.D., Levine M. A model for the control of ingestion. Psychol Rev. 84:1975;379-412.
5. Davis J.D. Some new developments in the understanding of oropharyngeal and postingestional control of meal size. Nutrition. 15:1998;32-39.
6. Antin J., Gibbs J., Holt J., Young R.C., Smith G.P. Cholecystokinin elicits the complete behavioral sequence of satiety in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 89:1975;784-790.
7. Blundell J.E., McArthur R.A. Behavioral flux and feeding. continuous monitoring of food intake and food selection, and the video-recording of appetitive and satiety sequences for the analysis of drug action Garattini S., Samanin Anorectic Agents. Mechanisms of Action and Tolerance:1981;19-42 Raven Press, New York.
8. Simansky K.J., Sisk F.C., Viadya A.H., Eberle-Wang K. Peripherally administered α-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine and 5-carboxamidotryptamine reduce food intake via different mechanisms in rats. Behav Pharmacol. 1:1990;241-246.
9. Davis J.D., Smith G.P., Singh B. A microstructural analysis of the control of water and isotonic saline ingestion by postingestional stimulation. Physiol Behav. 66:1999;543-548.
10. Spector A.C., SJ St. John Role of taste in the microstructure of quinine ingestion by rats. Am J Physiol. 274:1998;R1687-R1703.
11. Davis J.D., Keehn J.D. Magnitude of reinforcement and consummatory behavior. Science. 130:1959;269-271.
12. Stellar E., Hill J.M. The rat's rate of drinking as a function of water deprivation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 45:1952;96-102.
13. Davis J.D., Smith G.P. Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behav Neurosci. 106:1992;217-228.
14. Davis J.D. Deterministic and probabilistic control of the behavior of rats ingesting liquid diets. Am J Physiol. 270:1996;R793-R800.
15. Davis J.D., Campbell C.S. Peripheral control of meal size in the rat. effect of sham feeding on meal size and drinking rate J Comp Physiol Psychol. 83:1973;379-387.
16. Mook D.G. Oral and postingestional determinants of intake of various solutions in rats with esophageal fistulas. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 56:1963;645-659.
17. Young RC, Gibbs J, Antin J, Holt J, Smith GP. Absence of satiety during sham feeding in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1974:87:795-800.
18. Davis J.D., Smith G.P. Learning to sham feed. behavioral adjustments to the loss of physiological postingestional stimuli Am J Physiol. 259:1990;R1228-R1235.
19. Weingarten H.P., Kulikovsky O.T. Taste-to-postingestive consequence conditioning. is the rise in sham feeding with repeated experience a learning phenomenon? Physiol Behav. 45:1989;471-476.
20. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J.W. Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding? Am J Physiol. 248:1985;R387-R390.
21. Schneider L.H., Gibbs J., Smith G.P. D-2 selective receptor antagonists suppress sucrose sham feeding in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 17:1986;605-611.
22. Davis J.D., Smith G.P., Meisner J. Postpyloric stimuli are necessary for the normal control of meal size in real feeding and sham feeding rats. Am J Physiol. 265:1993;R888-R895.
23. Mindell S., Smith G.P., Greenberg D. Corn oil and mineral oil stimulate sham feeding in rats. Physiol Behav. 48:1990;283-287.
24. Spector A.C., Klumpp P.A., Kaplan J.M. Analytical issues in the evaluation of food derivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat. Behav Neurosci. 112:1998;678-694.
25. Davis J.D. Microstructural analysis of the ingestive behavior of the rat ingesting Polycose. Physiol Behav. 60:1996;1557-1563.
26. Davis JD, Breslin PAS. A microstructural analysis of the ingestion of glucose, maltose, and maltooligosaccharide. Physiol Behav. In press.
27. Breslin P.A.S., Davis J.D., Rosenak R. Saccharin increases the effectiveness of glucose in stimulating ingestion in rats but has little effect on negative feedback. Physiol Behav. 60:1996;411-416.
28. Davis J.D., Kung T.M., Rosenak R. Interaction between orosensory and postingestional stimulation in the control of corn oil intake by rats. Physiol Behav. 57:1995;1081-1087.