On hydrophobicity correlations in protein chains

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 2252-2258

  Irbäck, Anders ^a   Sandelin, Erik ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033738980     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76472-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bastolla, U., H. E. Roman, and M. Vendruscolo. 1999. Neutral evolution of model proteins: diffusion in sequence space and overdispersion. J. Theor. Biol. 200:49-54.
2. Bornberg-Bauer, E. 1997. How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? Biophys. J. 73:2393-2403.
3. Bornberg-Bauer, E., and H. S. Chan. 1999. Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology and superfunnels in sequence space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:10689-10694.
4. Broglia, R. A., G. Tiana, H. E. Roman, E. Vigezzi, and E. Shakhnovich. 1999. Stability of designed proteins against mutations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:4727-4730.
5. Bryngelson, J. D., J. N. Onuchic, N. D. Socci, and P. G. Wolynes. 1995. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 21:167-195.
6. Buchler, N. E. G., and R. A. Goldstein. 1999. Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 34:113-124.
7. Buchler, N. E. G., and R. A. Goldstein. 2000. Surveying determinants of protein structure designability across different energy models and amino-acid alphabets: a consensus. J. Chem. Phys. 112:2533-2547.
8. Chan, H. S., and K. A. Dill. 1994. Transition states and folding dynamics of proteins and heteropolymers. J. Chem. Phys. 100:9238-9257.
9. Creighton, T. E. 1993. Proteins: Their Structure and Molecular Properties. Freeman, New York.
10. Dill, K. A., S. Bromberg, K. Yue, K. M. Fiebig, D. P. Yee, P. D. Thomas, and H. S. Chan. 1995. Principles of protein folding: a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci. 4:561-602.
11. Ejtehadi, M. R., N. Hamedani, H. Seyed-Allaei, V. Shahrezaei, and M. Yahyanejad. 1998a. Stability of preferable structures for a hydrophobicpolar model of protein folding. Phys. Rev. E. 57:3298-3301.
12. Ejtehadi, M. R., N. Hamedani, H. Seyed-Allaei, V. Shahrezaei, and M. Yahyanejad. 1998b. Highly designable protein structures and intermonomer interactions. J. Phys. A. 31:6141-6155.
13. Govindarajan, S., and R. A. Goldstein. 1997a. Evolution of model proteins on a foldability landscape. Proteins: Struct. Fund. Genet. 29:461-466.
14. Govindarajan, S., and R. A. Goldstein. 1997b. The foldability landscape of model proteins. Biopolymers. 42:427-438.
15. Irbäck, A., C. Peterson, and F. Potthast. 1996. Evidence for nonrandom hydrophobicity structures in protein chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:9533-9538.
16. Irbäck, A., C. Peterson, and F. Potthast. 1997. Identification of amino acid sequences with good folding properties in an off-lattice model. Phys. Rev. E. 55:860-867.
17. Irbäck, A., and E. Sandelin. 1998. Local interactions and protein folding: a model study on the square and triangular lattices. J. Chem. Phys. 108:2245-2250.
18. Khokhlov, A. R., and P. G. Khalatur. 1998. Protein-like copolymers: computer simulation. Physica A. 249:253-261.
19. Khokhlov, A. R., and P. G. Khalatur. 1999. Conformation-dependent sequence design (engineering) of AB copolymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:3456-3459.
20. Klimov, D. K., and D. Thirumalai. 1998. Linking rates of folding in lattice models of proteins with underlying thermodynamic characteristics. J. Chem. Phys. 109:4119-4125.
21. Lau, K. F., and K. A. Dill. 1989. A lattice statistical model for the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins. Macromolecules. 22: 3986-3997.
22. Li, H., R. Helling, C. Tang, and N. Wingreen. 1996. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science. 273:666-669.
23. Martin, A. C. R., C. A. Orengo, E. G. Hutchinson, S. Jones, M. Karamirantzou, R. A. Laskowski, J. B. O. Mitchell, C. Taroni, and J. M. Thornton. 1998. Protein folds and function. Structure. 6:875-884.
24. Nymeyer, H., A. E. García, and J. N. Onuchic. 1998. Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:5921-5928.
25. Orengo, C. A., A. D. Michie, S. Jones, D. T. Jones, M. B. Swindells, and J. M. Thornton. 1997. CATH: a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure. 5:1093-1108.
26. Pande, V. S., A. Y. Grosberg, and T. Tanaka. 1994. Nonrandomness in protein sequences: evidence for a physically driven stage of evolution? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:12972-12975.
27. Peng, C.-K., S. V. Buldyrev, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, F. Sciortino, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley. 1992. Long-range correlations in nucleotide sequences. Nature. 356:168-170.
28. Sǎli, A., E. Shakhnovich, and M. Karplus. 1994. Kinetics of protein folding: a lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1614-1636.
29. Tiana, G., R. A. Broglia, and E. I. Shakhnovich. 2000. Hiking in the energy landscape in sequence space: a bumpy road to good folders. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 39:244-251.
30. White, S. H., and R. E. Jacobs. 1990. Statistical distribution of hydrophobic residues along the length of protein chains: implications for protein folding and evolution. Biophys. J. 57:911-921.