On the stability conditions for a class of parallel manipulators

Proceedings-IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 3, Issue , 2000, Pages 2386-2391

  Svinin, M M ^a   Ueda, K ^a   Uchiyama, M ^b  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK STABILIZABILITY; FORCE PLANNING; PARALLEL MANIPULATOR; SINGULAR CONFIGURATION; UNIFUNCTIONAL MANIPULATOR;

FEEDBACK CONTROL; FORCE CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MECHANISMS; MOTION PLANNING; STIFFNESS MATRIX; SYSTEM STABILITY;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0033707421     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.846384     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Argyris, J. (1982). An excursion into large rotations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 32, 85-155.
2. Christoffersen, J. (1989). When is a moment conservative?. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 56, 299-301.
3. Ciblak, N. and H. Lipkin (1994). Asymmetric Cartesian stiffness for the modeling of compliant robotic systems. In: ASME Design Technical Conference. Vol. DE-72. Minneapolis, USA. pp. 197-204.
4. Cutkosky, M. (1985). Robotic Grasping and Fine Manipulation. Kluver Academic Publishers. Boston.
5. Cutkosky, M.R. and I. Kao (1989). Computing and controlling the compliance of a robot hand. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 5(2), 151-165.
6. Gosselin, C. (1990). Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 6(3), 377-382.
7. Griffis, M. and J. Duffy (1993). Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings. Mechanism and Machine Theory 28(2), 207-224.
8. Hanafusa, H. and M.A. Adli (1991). Effect of internal forces on stiffness of closed mechanisms. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics. Pisa, Italy. pp. 845-850.
9. Horn, R.A. and C.R. Johnson (1986). Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
10. Kaneko, M., N. Imamura, K. Yokoi and K. Tanie (1990). A realization of stable grasp based on virtual stiffness model by robot fingers. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Yokohama, Japan. pp. 156-163.
11. Munawar, K. and M. Uchiyama (1998). Distributed eventbased control of unifunctional multiple manipulator system. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 2. Leuven, Belgium. pp. 1817-1822.
12. Munawar, K. and M. Uchiyama (1999). Experimental verification of distributed event-based control of multiple unifunctional manipulator system. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Detroit, Michigan. pp. 1213-1218.
13. Nguyen, V.-D. (1989). Constructing stable grasps. Int. Journal of Robotics Research 8(1), 26-37.
14. Prattichizo, D. and A. Bicchi (1998). Dynamic analysis of mobility and graspability of general manipulation systems. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 14(2), 241-258.
15. Uchiyama, M. (1998). Cooperative manipulation with multiple unifunctional robots. Research Project. Internet. http://vuu.space.mech.tohoku.ac.jp/project/ tebot/tebot.html.
16. Uchiyama, M., K. Hakomori and K. Shimizu (1983). An organization of servo control for multiple arm cooperation. In: Proc. 1st Annual Conf. of the Robotics Society of Japan. pp. 101-102. (In Japanese).
17. Uchiyama, M., K. Yoshimura, K. Abe and M. Esashi (1994). Object manipulation by a group of unifunctional microrobots. In: Proc. 12th Annual Conf. of the Robotics Society of Japan. pp. 549-550. (In Japanese).
18. Wen, J.T.-Y. and L.S. Wilfinger (1999). Kinematic manipulability of general constrained rigid multibody systems. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 15(3), 558-567.
19. Zefran, M. and V. Kumar (1997). Affine connections for the Cartesian stiffness matrix. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. pp. 1376-1381.