Management in relation to disturbance in the boreal forest

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 115, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 127-134

  Niemelä, Jari ^a  

^a PO Box 17 ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Boreal forest; Disturbance; Management

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0033594191     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00393-4     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aarne, M. (Ed.), 1995. Statistical yearbook of forestry. Agriculture and Forestry 1995, 5. The Forest Statistics Information Service of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa.
2. Angelstam, P., 1996. The ghost of forest past - Natural disturbance regimes as a basis for reconstruction of biologically diverse forests in Europe. In: DeGraaf, R.M., Miller, R.I. (Eds.), Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 287-337.
3. Angelstam, P., Rosenberg, P., Rülcker, C., 1993. Aldrig, sällan, ibland, ofta (in Swedish). Skog och Forskning 1, 34-41.
4. Aspi, J., Helle, P., 1984. Ekologinen sukkessio (in Finnish, with English abstract). Luonnon Tutkija 88, 186-193.
5. Christensen, N.L., Bartuska, A.M., Brown, J.H., Carpenter, S., D'Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J.F., MacMahon, J.A., Noss, R.F., Parsons, D.J., Peterson, C.H., Turner, M.G., Woodmansee, R.G., 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 6, 665-691.
6. Edenius, L., Elmberg, J., 1996. Landscape level effects of modern forestry on bird communities in north Swedish boreal forests. Landscape Ecol. 11, 325-338.
7. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., Sjöberg, K., 1997. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46, 16-47.
8. Fiedler, P.L., White, P.S., Leidy, R.A., 1997. The paradigm shift in ecology and its implications for conservation. In: Pickett, S.T.A., Ostfeld, R.S., Shachak, M., Likens, G.E. (Eds.), The Ecological Basis of Conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems, and Biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 83-92.
9. Franklin, J.F., 1995. Why link species conservation, environmental protection, and resource management? In: Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. (Eds.), Linking Species and Ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 326-335.
10. Haila, Y., 1994. Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: Ecological background, research, and management. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 203-217.
11. Haila, Y., 1995. Natural dynamics as a model for management: Is the analogue practicable? Arctic Centre Publications 7, 9-26.
12. Haila, Y., 1997. A 'natural' benchmark for ecosystem function. Conserv. Biol. 11, 300-301.
13. Haila, Y., Kouki, J., 1994. The phenomenon of biodiversity in conservation biology. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 5-18.
14. Haila, Y., Hanski, I.K., Niemelä, J., Punttila, P., Raivio, S., Tukia, H., 1994. Forestry and boreal fauna: Matching management with natural forest dynamics. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 187-202.
15. Hallman, E., Hokkanen, M., Juntunen, H., Korhonen, K.-M., Raivio, S., Savela, O. Siitonen, P., Tolonen, A., Vainio, M., 1996. Alue-ekologinen suunnittelu (in Finnish). Metsähallituksen metsätalouden, 3, julkaisuja Metsähallitus, Vantaa, 55 pp.
16. Halpern, C.B., Spies, T.A., 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol. Appl. 5, 913-934.
17. Hansen, A.J., Spies, T.A., Swanson, F.J., Ohmann, J.L., 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41, 382-392.
18. Holling, C.S., 1992. The role of forest insects in structuring the boreal landscape. In: Shugart, H.H., Leemans, R., Bonan, G.B. (Eds.), A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 170-191.
19. Holling, C.S., 1996. Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecol. Appl. 6, 733-735.
20. Hunter, M., 1993. Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biol. Conserv. 65, 115-120.
21. Loope, W.L., 1991. Interrelationship of fire history, land-use history, and landscape pattern within Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. Michigan Can. Field-Nat. 105, 18-28.
22. Mladenoff, D.J., White, M.A., Pastor, J., Crow, T.R., 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 3, 294-306.
23. Niemelä, J., 1997. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11, 601-610.
24. Niemela, J., Haila, Y., Halme, E., Lahti, T., Pajunen, T., Punttila, P., 1988. The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forest. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 25, 107-119.
25. Niemelä, J., Langor, D., Spence, J.R., 1993. Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv. Biol. 7, 551-561.
26. Niemelä, J., Spence, J.R., Langor, D., Haila, Y., Tukia, H., 1994. Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: Implications for conservation. In: Gaston, K., Samways, M., New, T. (Eds.), Perspectives in Insect Conservation. Intercept, Andover, pp. 29-50.
27. Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., Punttila, P., 1996. The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: Diversity variation in forest-floor invertebrates across the successional gradient. Ecography 19, 352-368.
28. Noss, R.F., Cooperrider, A.Y., 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy. Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC.
29. Økland, B., 1994. Mycetophilidae (Diptera), an insect group vulnerable to forestry practices? A comparison of clearcut, managed and semi-natural spruce forests in southern Norway. Biodivers. Conserv. 3, 68-85.
30. Paalamo, P., 1995a. Pintakasvillisuuden lajimäärät. In: Raivio, S. (Ed.), Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankkeen väliraportti (in Finnish), Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43, Vantaa, pp. 48-53.
31. Paalamo, P., 1995b. Sienilajisto. In: Raivio, S. (Ed.), Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankkeen väliraportti (in Finnish). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43, Vantaa, pp. 54-63.
32. Penttilä, R., 1991. Kääpälajiston esiintyminen käsittelytavoiltaan erilaisissa metsissä Keski-Suomessa (in Finnish). Master of Science thesis, Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki.
33. Penttilä, R., 1995. Käävät. In: Raivio, S. (Ed.), Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankkeen väliraportti (in Finnish). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43, Vantaa, pp. 64-73.
34. Perry, D.A., Amaranthus, M.P., 1997. Disturbance, recovery, and stability. In: Kohm, K.A., Franklin, J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 31-56.
35. Pickett, S.T.A., Parker, V.T., Fiedler, P.L., 1992. The new paradigm in ecology: Implications for conservation biology above the species level. In: Fiedler, P.L., Jain, S.K. (Eds.), Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation, and Management. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 65-88.
36. Pajunen, T., 1995. Hämähäkkilajisto metsäsukkessiossa. In: Raivio, S. (Ed.), Talousmetsien luonnonsuojelu-yhteistutkimushankkeen väliraportti (in Finnish). Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, sarja A:43, Vantaa, pp. 97-102.
37. Pimm, S.L., 1991. The Balance of Nature? University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. Rassi, P., Kaipiainen, H., Mannerkoski, I., Ståhls, G., 1991. Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien seurantatoimikunnan mietintö (Report on the monitoring of threatened animals and plants in Finland, (in Finnish with English abstract). Committee report 1991:30, Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.
39. Rundlöf, U., Nilsson, S.G., 1995. Fern Ess metoden: spåra skyddsvärd skog i södra Sverige (in Swedish). Naturskyddsföreningen, Helsingborg.
40. Savolainen, J. (Ed.), 1997. Metsälaki perusteluineen (in Finnish). Edita, Helsinki.
41. Siitonen, J., Martikainen, P., 1994. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: A comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scand. J. For. Res. 9, 185-191.
42. Sprugel, D.G., 1991. Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: What is 'natural' vegetation in a changing environment? Biol. Conserv. 58, 1-18.
43. Syrjänen, K., Kalliola, R., Puolasmaa, A., Mattsson, J., 1994. Landscape structure and forest dynamics in subcontinental Russian European taiga. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 19-34.
44. Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V., Shugart, H.H., 1987. Landscape ecology: A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37, 119-127.
45. Virkkala, R., 1991. Population trends of forest birds in Finnish Lapland in a landscape of large habitat blocks: Consequences of stochastic environmental variation or regional habitat alteration? Biol. Conserv. 56, 223-240.
46. Väisänen, R.A., Järvinen, O., Rauhala, P., 1986. How are extensive, human-caused habitat alterations expressed on the scale of local populations in boreal forests? Ornis Scand. 17, 282-292.
47. Wallin, D.O., Swanson, F.J., Marks, B., Cissel, J.H., Kertis, J., 1996. Comparison of managed and pre-settlement landscape dynamics in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 85, 291-309.
48. Wiens, J.A., 1997. The emerging role of patchiness on conservation biology. In: Pickett, S.T.A., Ostfeld, R.S., Shachak, M., Likens, G.E. (Eds.), The Ecological Basis of Conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems, and Biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 93-107.
49. Wikars, L.-O., 1992. Skogsbränder och insekter (Forest fires and insects, in Swedish with English abstract). Entomol. tidskr. 113, 1-11.
50. Wu, J., Loucks, O.L., 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 70, 439-466.