Modeling the combination of motion, stereo, and vergence angle cues to visual depth

Neural Computation

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1297-1330

  Fine, I ^a   Jacobs, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033566448     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976699300016250     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blake, A., Bülthoff, H. H., & Sheinberg, D. (1993). Shape from texture: Ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vision Research, 33, 1723-1737.
2. Bradshaw, M. E, Glennerster, A., & Rogers, B. J. (1996). The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Research, 36, 1255-1264.
3. Braunstein, M. L., & Tittle, J. S. (1988). The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 582-590.
4. Brenner, E., van Damme, W. J. M., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1997). Holding an object one is looking at: Kinesthetic information on the object's distance does not improve visual judgment of its size. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1153-1159.
5. Bruno, N., & Cutting., J. E. (1988). Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 161-170.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 1749-1758.
7. Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1993). Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 32-47.
8. Chauvin, Y., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1995). Backpropagation: Theory, architectures, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Clark, J., & Yuille, A. L. (1990). Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
10. Dosher, B. A., Sperling, G., & Wurst, S. (1986). Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure. Vision Research, 26, 973-990.
11. Durgin, F. H., Proffitt, D. R., Olsen., J. T., & Reinke, K. S. (1995). Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 679-699.
12. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J., and Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). The constancy of depth and surface shape for stereoscopic surfaces under more naturalistic viewing conditions. Perception, 22 (suppl.), 118.
13. Gogel, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 105-123.
14. Graziano, M. S. A., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Multiple representations of space in the brain. Neuroscientist, 1, 43-50.
15. Jacobs, R. A., & Fine, I. (1998). Integration of texture and motion cues to depth is adaptable. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 39, S670.
16. Johnston, E. B. (1991). Systematic deviations of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1351-1360.
17. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., & Landy, M. S. (1994). Integration of motion and stereopsis cues. Vision Research, 34, 2259-2275.
18. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
19. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., & Young, M. (1991). Psychophysical estimation of the human depth combination rule. In P. S. Schenker (Ed.), Sensor fusion III: 3-D perception and recognition, Proceedings of the SPIE, 1383 (pp. 247-254).
20. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., and Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.
21. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1989). On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth. Science, 244, 716-718.
22. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1991). The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 320-344.
23. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1993). On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth. Vision Research, 33, 1561-1571.
24. Ono, H., & Steinbach, M. J. (1990). Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 179-197.
25. Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., Lappin, J. S., & Phillips, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 377-388.
26. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 697-717.
27. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & PDF Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 1 : Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Smolensky, P., Mozer, M. C., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1996). Mathematical perspectives on neural networks. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. T., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 663-678.
32. Trotter, Y., Celebrini, S., Stricanne, B., Thorpe, S., & Imbert, M. (1992). Modulation of stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. Science, 257, 1279-1281.
33. Turner, J., Braunstein, M. L., & Anderson, G. J. (1997). The relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 370-380.
34. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research, 33, 2685-2696.