The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: A quantitative analysis

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 201, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-74

  Stamenović, Dimitrije ^a   Coughlin, Mark F ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CYTOARCHITECTURE; CYTOSKELETON; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROTUBULE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 0033533978     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1014     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. BAUSCH A. R., ZIEMANN F., BOULBITCH A. A., JACOBSON K., SACKMANN E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 75:1998;2038-2049.
2. BOEY S. K., BOAL D. H., DISCHER D. E. Simulations of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton at large deformation. I. Microscopic models. Biophys. J. 75:1998;1573-1583.
3. BRAET F., ROTSCH C., WISSE E., RADMACHER M. Comparison of fixed and living liver endothelial cells by atomic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. A. 66:1997;S575-S578.
4. BRODLAND G. W., GORDON R. Intermediate filaments may prevent buckling of compressively loaded microtubules. ASME J. Biomech. Engng. 112:1990;319-321.
5. BUDIANSKY B., KIMMEL E. Elastic moduli of lungs. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 54:1987;351-358.
6. CHEN C. S., MRKSICH M., MRKSICH S., WHITESIDES G. M., INGBER D. E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science. 276:1997;1425-1428.
7. CHICUREL M. E., CHEN C. S., INGBER D. E. Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 10:1998;232-239.
8. COUGHLIN M. F., STAMENOVIĆ D. A tensegrity structure with buckling compression elements: application to cell mechanics. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 64:1997;480-486.
9. COUGHLIN M. F., STAMENOVIĆ D. A tensegrity model of the cytoskeleton in spread and round cells. ASME J. Biomech. Engng. 120:1998;770-777.
10. CRICK F. H. C., HUGHES A. F. W. The physical properties of cytoplasm: a study by means of the magnetic particle method. I. Experimental. Exp. Cell Res. 1:1950;37-80.
11. DAVIES P. F., TRIPATHI S. C. Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell: an endothelial paradigm. Circ. Res. 72:1993;239-245.
12. DEMBO M. Mechanics and control of the cytoskeleton in Amoeba proteus. Biophys. J. 55:1989;1054-1080.
13. DUPUIS D. E., GUILFORD W. H., WU J., WARSHAW D. M. Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 18:1997;17-30.
14. EVANS E., LEUNG A., ZHELEV D. Synchrony of cell spreading and contraction force as phagocytes engulf large pathogens. J. Cell Biol. 122:1993;1295-1300.
15. FINER J. T., SIMMONS R. M., SPUDICH J. A. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton force and nanometre steps. Nature. 368:1994;113-119.
16. FOLKMAN J., MOSCONA A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature. 273:1978;345-349.
17. FORGACS G. On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signalling: an approach based on percolation. J. Cell. Sci. 108:1995;2131-2143.
18. FREDBERG J. J., WANG N., STAMENOVIĆ D., INGBER D. E. Micromechanics of the lung: from the parenchyma to the cytoskeleton. Hlastala M. P., Robertson H. T. Complexity in Structure and Function of the Lung. 1998;99-122 Dekker, New York.
19. GIBSON L. J., ASHBY M. F. Cellular Solids: Structure & Properties. 1988;Pergamon Press, Oxford.
20. GITTES F., MICKEY B., NETTLETON J., HOWARD J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctutations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120:1993;923-934.
21. HARRIS A. K., WILD P., STOPAK D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science. 208:1980;177-180.
22. HEIDEMANN S. R., BUXBAUM R. E. Mechanical tension as a regulator of axonal development. NeuroToxicology. 15:1994;95-108.
23. HOFMANN U. G., ROTSCH C., PARK W. J., RADMACHER M. Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J. Struc. Biol. 119:1997;84-91.
24. HUBMAYR, R. D. SHORE, S. A. FREDBERG, J. J. PLANUS, E. PANETTIERI, Jr, R. A. MOLLER, W. HEYDER, J. WANG, N. 1996, Pharmacological activation changes stiffness of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells, Am. J. Physiol. 271, Cell Physiol. 40, C1660, C1668.
25. INGBER D. E. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 104:1993;613-627.
26. INGBER D. E., FOLKMAN J. Tension and compression as basic determinants of cell form and function: utilization of cellular tensegrity mechanism. Stein W. D., Bronner F. Cell Shape: Determinants, Regulation and Regulatory Role. 1989;3-31 Academic Press, San Diego.
27. INGBER D. E., JAMIESON J. D. Cells as tensegrity structures: architectural regulation of hystodifferentiation by physical forces transduced over basement membrane. Anderson L. C., Gahmbeg C. G., Ekbolm P. Gene Expression during Normal and Malignant Differentiation. 1985;13-32 Academic Press, London.
28. ISHIJIMA A., KOJIMA H., HIGUCHI H., HARADA Y., FUNATSU T., YANAGIDA T. Multiple- and single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor by nanometer-piconewton manipulation with a microneedle: unitary steps and forces. Biophys. J. 70:1996;383-400.
29. ISHIJIMA A., HARADA Y., KOJIMA H., FUNATSU T., HIGUCHI H., YANAGIDA T. Single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor using nano-manipulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 199:1994;1057-1063.
30. JANMEY P. A. The cytoskeleton and cell signalling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol. Rev. 78:1998;763-781.
31. JANMEY P. A., EUTENAUER U., TRAUB P., SCHLIWA M. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J. Cell Biol. 113:1991;155-160.
32. KAECH S., LUDIN B., MATUS A. Cytoskeletal plasticity in cells expressing neuronal microtubule-associated proteins. Neuron. 17:1996;1189-1199.
33. KITAZUMI K., MIO M., TASAKA K. Involvement of the microtubular system in the endothelin-1 secretion from porcine aortic endothelial cells. Biochem. Pharm. 42:1991;1079-1085.
34. LOVE A. E. H. A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. 1944;Dover, New York. p. 160-162.
35. MACKINTOSH F. C., KAS J., JANMEY P. A. Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75:1995;4425-4428.
36. MAKSYM G. N., FABRY B., LAPORTE J. D., MOORE P. E., BUTLER J. P., NAVAJAS D., FREDBERG J. J. Mechanical impedance of activated human airway smooth muscle cells from 0.05 to 0.2Hz. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care. 159:1999;A470.
37. MIYATA H., YOSHIKAWA H., HAKOZAKI H., SUZUKI N., FURUNO T., IKEGAMI A., KINOSITA K. Jr, NISHIZAKA T., ISHIWATA S. Mechanical measurements of single actomyosin motor force. Biophys J. 68:1995;286s-290s.
38. MOLLOY J. E., BURNS J. E., KENDRICK-JONES J., TREGEAR R. T., WHITE D. C. S. Movement and force produced by a single myosin head. Nature. 378:1995;209-212.
39. OOSAWA F. Actin-actin bond strength and the conformational change of F-actin. Biorheology. 14:1997;11-19.
40. PETERSEN N. O., MCCONNAUGEY W. B., ELSON E. L. Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:1982;5327-5331.
41. PORTER K. R. The cytomatrix: a short history of its study. J. Cell. Biol. 99:1984;3s-12s.
42. POTARD, U. S. B. BUTLER, J. P. WANG, N. 1997, Cytoskeletal mechanics in confluent epithelial cells probed through integrins and E-cadherins, Am. J. Physiol. 272, Cell Physiol. 41, C1654, C1663.
43. POURATI, J. MANIOTIS, A. SPIEGEL, D. SCHAFFER, J. L. BUTLER, J. P. FREDBERG, J. J. INGBER, D. E. STAMENOVIĆ, D. WANG, N. 1998, Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells?, Am. J. Physiol. 274, Cell Physiol. 43, C1283, C1289.
44. SATCHER R. L. Jr, DEWEY C. F. Jr. Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Biophys. J. 71:1996;109-118.
45. SATCHER R., DEWEY C. F. Jr, HARTWIG J. H. Mechanical remodeling of the endothelial surface and actin cytoskeleton induced by fluid flow. Microcirculation. 4:1997;439-453.
46. SATO M., OHSHIMA N., NEREM R. M. Viscoelastic properties of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. J. Biomech. 29:1996;461-467.
47. SATO M., THERET D. P., WHEELER L. T., OHSHIMA N., NEREM R. M. Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. ASME J. Biomech. Engng. 112:1990;263-268.
48. SCHLIWA M. The Cytoskeleton. 1986;Springer-Verlag, New York.
49. SHROFF, S. G. SANER, D. R. LAL, R. 1995, Dynamic micromechanical properties of cultured rat arterial myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy, Am. J. Physiol. 269, Cell Physiol. 38, C286, C292.
50. SIMS J., KARP S., INGBER D. E. Altering the cellular mechanical force balance results in integrated changes in cell, cytoskeletal, and nuclear shape. J. Cell Sci. 103:1992;1215-1222.
51. SINGHVI R., KUMAR A., LOPEZ G., STEPHANOPOULOS G. N., WANG D. I. C., WHITESIDES G. M., INGBER D. E. Engineering cell shape and function. Science. 264:1994;696-698.
52. STAMENOVIĆ D., FREDBERG J. J., WANG N., BUTLER J. P., INGBER D. E. A microstructural approach to cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity. J. theor. Biol. 181:1996;125-136.
53. STAMENOVIĆ D., WILSON T. A. Parenchymal stability. J. Appl. Physiol. 73:1992;596-602.
54. TAKEBAYASHI T., MORITA Y., OOSAWA F. Electronmicroscopic investigation of the flexibility of F-actin. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 492:1977;357-363.
55. THOUMINE O. Control of cellular morphology by mechanical factors. J. Phys. III France. 6:1996;1555-1566.
56. THOUMINE O., OTT A. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell Sci. 110:1997;2109-2116.
57. TSUDA Y., YASUTAKE H., ISHIJIMA A., YANAGIDA T. Torsional rigidity of single actin filaments and actin-actin bond breaking force under torsion measured directly byin vitro micromanipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:1996;12937-12942.
58. VANBUREN P., GILFORD W. H., KENNEDY G., WU J., WARSHAW D. M. Smooth muscle myosin: a high force-generating molecular motor. Biophys. J. 68:1995;256s-259s.
59. VOROBJEV I. A., SVITKINA T. M., BORISY G. G. Cytoplasmic assembly of microtubules in cultured cells. J. Cell Sci. 110:1997;2635-2645.
60. WANG N., BUTLER J. P., INGBER D. E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 260:1993;1124-1127.
61. WANG N., INGBER D. E. Control of the cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. Biophys. J. 66:1994;2181-2189.
62. WARREN W. E., KRAYNIK A. M. The linear elastic properties of open-cell foams. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 55:1988;341-346.
63. WARREN W. E., KRAYNIK A. M. Linear elastic behavior of a low-density Kelvin foam with open cells. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 64:1997;787-794.
64. WATERMAN-STORER C. M., SALMON E. D. Actomyosin-based retrograde flow of microtubules in the lamella of migrating epithelial cells influences microtubule dynamic instability and turnover and is associated with microtubule breakage and treadmilling. J. Cell Biol. 139:1997;417-434.
65. WENDLING S., ODDOU C., ISABEY D. Stiffening response of a cellular tensegrity model. J. theor. Biol. 196:1999;309-325.
66. YANAGIDA T., NAKASE M., NISHIYAMA K., OOSAWA F. Direct observation of motion of single F-actin filaments in the presence of myosin. Nature. 307:1984;58-60.