Strategies for the assessment of acute skin irritation potential

Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-9

  Robinson, Michael K ^a   Osborne, Rosemarie ^a   Perkins, Mary A ^a  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; DETERGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; NONIONIC SURFACTANT; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; SURFACTANT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; CORROSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; RABBIT; REVIEW; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN TEST; TECHNIQUE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; CAUSTICS; CELL SURVIVAL; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; RABBITS; SKIN;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 0033500628     PISSN: 10568719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1056-8719(99)00037-4     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Augustin C., Collombel C., Damour O. Use of dermal equivalent and skin equivalent models for identifying phototoxic compounds in vitro. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 13:1997;27-36.
2. Augustin C., Collombel C., Damour O. Use of dermal equivalent and skin equivalent models for in vitro cutaneous irritation testing of cosmetic products. Comparison with in vivo human data J Toxicol-Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 17:1998;5-17.
3. Barlow A., Hirst R., Pemberton M.A., Rigden A., Hall T.J., Oliver G.-J.A., Botham P.A. Refinement of an in vitro test for the identification of skin corrosive chemicals. Toxicol Methods. 1:1991;106-115.
4. Barratt M.D., Brantom P.G., Fentem J.H., Gerner I., Walker A.P., Worth A.P. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 1. Selection and distribution of the test chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro. 12:1998;471-482.
5. Basketter D., Blaikie L., Reynolds F. The impact of atopic status on a predictive human test of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis. 35:1996;33-39. a.
6. Basketter D.A., Chamberlain M., Griffiths H.A., Rowson M., Whittle E., York M. The classification of skin irritants by human patch test. Food Chem Toxicol. 35:1997;845-852.
7. Basketter D.A., Griffiths H.A., Wang X.M., Wilhelm K.P., McFadden J. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin. the implications for a predictive human patch test Contact Dermatitis. 35:1996;208-213. b.
8. Basketter D.A., Whittle E., Chamberlain M. Identification of irritation and corrosion hazards to skin. an alternative strategy to animal testing Food Chem Toxicol. 32:1994;539-542. a.
9. Basketter D.A., Whittle E., Griffiths H.A., York M. The identification and classification of skin irritation hazard by a human patch test. Food Chem Toxicol. 32:1994;769-775. b.
10. Bernhofer L.P., Barkovic S., Appa Y., Martin K.M. IL-1α and IL-1ra secretion from epidermal equivalents and the prediction of the irritation potential of mild soap and surfactant-based consumer products. Toxicol In Vitro. 13:1999;231-239.
11. Blank I.H., Finesinger J.E. Electrical resistance of the skin. Arch Neururol Phychiat. 56:1964;544-557.
12. Boelsma E., Tanojo H., Bodde H.E., Ponec M. Assessment of the potential irritancy of oleic acid on human skin. evaluation in vitro and in vivo Toxicol In Vitro. 10:1996;729-742.
13. Botham P.A., Chamberlain M., Barratt M.D., Curren R.D., Esdaile D.J., Gardner J.R., Gordon V.C., Hildebrand B., Lewis R.W., Liebsch M., Logemann P., Osborne R., Ponec M., Regnier J.F., Steiling W., Walker A.P., Balls M. A prevalidation study on in vitro skin corrosivity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 6. ATLA-Altern Lab Anim. 23:1995;219-255.
14. Botham P.A., Earl L.K., Fentem J.H., Roguet R., Johannes J.M. Alternative methods for skin irritation testing. the current state ATLA-Altern Lab Anim. 26:1998;195-211.
15. Botham P.A., Hall T.J., Dennett R., McCall J.C., Basketter D.A., Whittle E., Cheeseman M., Esdaile D.J., Gardner J. The skin corrosivity test in vitro. results of an inter-laboratory trial Toxicol In Vitro. 6:1992;191-194.
16. Campbell R.L., Bruce R.D. Comparative dermatotoxicology. I. Direct comparison of rabbit and human primary skin irritation responses to isopropylmyristate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 59:1981;555-563.
17. Cannon C.L., Neal P.J., Southee J.A., Kubilus J., Klausner M. New epidermal model for dermal irritancy testing. Toxicol In Vitro. 8:1994;889-891.
18. Cassidy S.L., Stanton E.S. In vitro skin irritation and corrosivity studies on organosilicon compounds. J Toxicol-Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 15:1996;355-367.
19. Code of Federal Regulations. (1991). Department of Transportation. Method of testing corrosion to the skin. Title 49, Appendix A. Code of Federal Regulations.
20. Draize J.H., Woodard G., Calvery H.O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharm Exp Therap. 82:1944;377-390.
21. European Community. (1992). Annex to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances. Off Jo Eur Comm L84, 36:1.
22. Prevalidation of in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. ATLA-Altern Lab Anim. 27:1999;221-223.
23. Council Directive 93/35/EEC of 14 June 1993 amending for the 6th time Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Off J Eur Comm L. 15:1993;32.
24. Fentem J.H., Archer G.E.B., Balls M., Botham P.A., Curren R.D., Earl L.K., Esdaile D.J., Holzhütter H.G., Liebsch M. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the management team. Toxicol In Vitro. 12:1998;483-524.
25. ® system. a DOT accepted method to predict corrosivity potential of test materials Rougier A., Goldberg A.M., Maibach H.I. In Vitro Skin Toxicology. 1994;37-45 Mary Ann Liebert, New York.
26. Griffiths H.A., Wilhelm K.P., Robinson M.K., Wang X.M., McFadden J., York M., Basketter D.A. Interlaboratory evaluation of a human patch test for the identification of skin irritation potential/hazard. Food Chem Toxicol. 35:1997;255-260.
27. Gueniche, A., & Ponec, M. (1993). Use of human skin cell cultures for the estimation of potential skin irritants. Toxicol In Vitro 7, -24.
28. Harvell J., Bason M.M., Maibach H.I. In vitro skin irritation assays. relevance to human skin J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 30:1992;359-369. a.
29. Harvell J., Maibach H.I. In vitro dermal toxicity tests. validation aspects Cosmet Toiletries. 107:1992;31-34. b.
30. Harvell J.D., Maibach H.I. Validation of in vitro skin irritation assays using human in vivo data. In Vitro Toxicol. 5:1992;235-239.
31. Harvell J.D., Tsai Y.C., Mailbach H.I., Gay R., Gordon V.C., Miller K., Mun G.C. An in vivo correlation with three in vitro assays to assess skin irritation potential. J Toxicol-Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 13:1994;171-183.
32. Holland, G., Earl, L.K., & Hall-Manning, T.J. (1998). Assessment of the skin irritation effect of mixed surfactants using the 4 hour human patch test and EpiDerm™ EPI-100 in vitro skin model. Proceedings of 38th International Detergency Conference. 81-85.
33. Kubilus J., Cannon C., Neal P., Sennott H., Klausner M. Response of the EpiDerm skin model to topically applied irritants and allergens. In Vitro Toxicol. 9:1996;157-166.
34. Lawrence J.N. Application of in vitro human skin models to dermal irritancy. a brief overview and future prospects Toxicol In Vitro. 11:1997;305-312.
35. Lewis R.W., Botham P.A. Measurement of transcutaneous electrical resistance to assess the skin corrosivity potential of chemicals. Rougier A., Goldberg A.M., Maibach H.I. In Vitro Skin Toxicology. 1994;161-169 Mary Ann Liebert, New York.
36. McFadden J.P., Wakelin S.H., Basketter D.A. Acute irritation thresholds in subjects with Type I-Type VI skin. Contact Dermatitis. 38:1998;147-149.
37. Nixon G.A., Tyson C.A., Wertz W.C. Interspecies comparisons of skin irritancy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 31:1975;481-490.
38. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD. (1993). OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. 404, 1-6.
39. Oliver G.J., Pemberton M.A. An in vitro epidermal slice technique for identifying chemicals with potential for severe cutaneous effects. Food Chem Toxicol. 23:1985;229-232.
40. Oliver G.J., Pemberton M.A., Rhodes C. An in vitro skin corrosivity test - modifications and validation. Food Chem Toxicol. 24:1986;507-512.
41. Oliver G.J.A., Pemberton M.A., Rhodes C. An in vitro model for identifying skin-corrosive chemicals. I. Initial validation Toxicol In Vitro. 2:1988;7-18.
42. Osborne R., Perkins M.A. An approach for development of alternative test methods based on mechanisms of skin irritation. Food Chem Toxicol. 32:1994;133-142.
43. Patil S.M., Patrick E., Maibach H.I. Animal, human, and in vitro test methods for predicting skin irritation. Marzulli F.N., Mailbach H.I. Dermatotoxicology Methods. 1998;89-113 Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C.
44. Perkins M.A., Osborne R., Johnson G.R. Development of an in vitro method for skin corrosion testing. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 31:1996;9-18.
45. Perkins M.A., Osborne R., Rana F., Ghassemi A., Robinson M.K. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential. Toxicol Sci. 48:1999;218-229.
46. Perkins M.A., Robinson M.K., Osborne R. Alternative methods in dermatotoxicology. Marzulli F.N., Maibach H.I. Dermatotoxicology Methods. 1998;319-336 Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C.
47. Phillips L., Steinberg M., Maibach H.I., Akers W.A. A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 21:1972;369-382.
48. Ponec, M. (1994). The use of in vitro skin recombinants to evaluate cutaneous toxicity. In: A. Rougier, A.M. Goldberg, & H.I. Maibach (Eds.), In Vitro Skin Toxicology. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
49. Ponec M., Kempenaar J. Use of human skin recombinants as an in vitro model for testing the irritation potential of cutaneous irritants. Skin Pharmacol. 8:1995;49-59.
50. 2™). an in vitro model to assess cutaneous immunotoxicity Toxicol In Vitro. 8:1994;1007-1014.
51. Robinson M.K., Perkins M.A., Basketter D.A. Application of a 4-h human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 38:1998;194-202.
52. Robinson M.K., Perkins M.A., Osborne R. Comparative studies on cultured human skin models for irritation testing. Zutphen L.F.M., Balls M. Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics. 1997;1123-1134 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
53. Robinson M.K., Whittle E., Basketter D.A. A two center study of the development of acute irritation responses to fatty acids. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 10:1999;136-145.
54. Roguet R., Cohen C., Robles C., Courtellemont P., Tolle M., Guillot J.P., Duteil X.P. An interlaboratory study of the reproducibility and relevance of Episkin, a reconstructed human epidermis, in the assessment of cosmetics irritancy. Toxicol In Vitro. 12:1998;294-304.
55. Rosdy M., Bertino B., Butet V., Gibbs S., Ponec M., Darmon M. Retinoic acid inhibits epidermal differentiation when applied topically on the stratum corneum of epidermis formed In Vitro by human keratinocytes grown on defined medium. In Vitro Toxicol. 10:1997;39-47.
56. ®. An in vitro test method for assessing dermal corrosivity potential of chemicals http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/corprrep.htm :1999.
57. Walker A.P., Basketter D.A., Baverel M., Diembeck W., Matthies W., Mougin D., Rothlisberger R., Coroama M. Test guidelines for the assessment of skin tolerance of potentially irritant cosmetic ingredients in man. Food Chem Toxicol. 35:1997;1099-1106.
58. Whittle E., Barratt M.D., Carter J.A., Basketter D.A., Chamberlain M. Skin corrosivity potential of fatty acids. in vitro rat and human skin testing and QSAR studies Toxicol In Vitro. 10:1996;95-100.
59. York M., Griffiths H.A., Whittle E., Basketter D.A. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential. Contact Derm. 34:1996;204-212.