Target cuing in visual search: The effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention

Human Factors

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 524-542

  Yeh, Michelle ^a   Wickens, Christopher D ^a   Seagull, F Jacob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AVIATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HELMET; HYPOTHESIS; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 0033498955     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779656752     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
2. Conejo, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). The effects of highlighting validity and feature type on air-to-ground target acquisition performance (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report No. ARL-97-11/NAWC-ONR-97-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
3. Drascic, D., & Milgram, P. (1996). Perceptual issues in augmented reality. In M. T. Bolas, S. S Fisher, & J.O. Merritt (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineers (SPIE): Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III (Vol. 2653, pp. 123-134). Bellingham. WA: SPIE.
4. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
5. Fadden, S., Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998). Costs and benefits of head-up display use: A meta-analytic approach. In Proceedings of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 16-20). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6. Fadden, S., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Maximizing traffic awareness with a head-up flightpath highway display (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report No. ARL-97-1/FAA-97-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
7. Flannagan, P., McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., Meehan, J. W., & Oldfield, S. R. (1998). Aurally and visually guided visual search in a virtual environment. Human Factors, 40, 461-468.
8. Foyle, D. C., Andre, A. D., McCann, R. S., Wenzel, E. M., Begault, D. R., & Battiste, V. (1996). Taxiway navigation and situation awareness (T-NASA) system: Problem, design philosophy, and description of an integrated display suite for low-visibility airport surface operations. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 105, 1411-1418.
9. Foyle, D. C., McCann, R. S., & Shelden, S. G. (1995). Attentional issues with superimposed symbology formats for scene-linked displays. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University.
10. Hettinger, L. J., Nelson, W. T., & Haas, M. W. (1994). Comparison of target detection performance using a helmet-mounted display and a conventional flight simulator dome display. In Proceedings of '94 Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (pp. 299-306). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
11. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Levy, J., Foyle, D. C., & McCann, R. S. (1998). Attentional allocation and head-up displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 11-15). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13. Martin-Emerson, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display. Human Factors, 39, 581-601.
14. McCann, R. S., Foyle, D. C., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Attentional limitations with head-up displays. In Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XXII. San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
15. Mosier, K., Skitka, L., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1998). Automation bias: Decision making and performance in high technology cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 47-63.
16. Muller, M. W., & Rabbitt, R. D. (1989). Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of "where" and "what" decisions in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 747-773.
17. National Research Council. (1997). Tactical display for soldiers: Human factors considerations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Ockerman, J. J., & Pritchett, A. R. (1998, May). Preliminary study of wearable computers for aircraft inspection. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Montreal, Canada.
19. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
20. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Sampson, J. B. (1993). Cognitive performance by individuals using a head-mounted display while walking. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 338-342). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22. Seagull, F. J., & Gopher, D. (1997). Training head movement in visual scanning: An embedded approach to the development of piloting skills with helmet-mounted displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(3), 163-180.
23. Swennsen, R. G., Hessel, S. J., & Herman, P. G. (1977). Omissions in radiology: Faulty search of stringent reporting criteria? Radiology, 123, 563-567.
24. Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998a). Conformal flight path symbology for head-up displays: Defining the distribution of visual attention in three-dimensional space (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report No. ARL-98-5/NASA-98-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
25. Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998b). Head-up displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 377-403.
26. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Harper-Collins.
27. Wickens, C. D. (1997). Attentional issues in head-up displays. In Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Integration of theory and application (pp. 3-21). London: Avebury Technical.
28. Wickens, C. D., Liang, C.-C., Prevett, T., & Olmos, O. (1996). Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241-271.
29. Wickens, C. D., & Long, J. (1995). Object versus space-based models of visual attention: Implications for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 179-193.
30. Wickens, C. D., Mavor, A. S., Parasuraman, R., & McGee, J. P. (Eds). (1998). The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Performance issues in helmet mounted displays (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report No. ARL-97-9/ARMY-FED-LAB-97-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
32. Yeh, M., Wickens, C. D., & Seagull, J. (1998). Effects of frame of reference and viewing condition on attentional issues with helmet-mounted displays (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report No. ARL-98-1/ARMY-FED-LAB-98-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.