Superimposition, Symbology, Visual Attention, and the Head-Up Display

Human Factors

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 581-601

  Martin Emerson, Robin ^a   Wickens, Christopher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AVIATION; BIOENGINEERING; COGNITION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ATTENTION; AVIATION; COGNITION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATA DISPLAY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031292955     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872097778667933     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory and Cognition, 11, 601-608.
2. Boucek, G. P., Pfaff, T. A., & Smith, W. D. (1983). The use of holographic head-up display of flight path symbology in varying weather conditions (SAE Tech. Paper 831445). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
3. Bray, R. S. (1980). A head-up display format for application to transport aircraft approach and landing (NASA Tech. Memorandum 81199). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
4. Bray, R. S., & Scott, B. C. (1981). A head-up display for low visibility approach and landing (AIAA-81-0130). Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
5. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
6. Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1974). Effects of noise letter upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
7. Fischer, E. (1979). The role of cognitive switching in head-up displays (NASA Contractor Report 3137). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
8. Fischer, E., Haines, R. F., & Price, T. A. (1980). Cognitive issues in head-up displays (NASA Tech. Paper 1711). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
9. Jensen, R. S. (1981). Prediction and quickening in perspective display for curved landing approaches. Human Factors, 23, 333-364.
10. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
11. Larish, I. A., & Wickens, C. D. (1991). Divided attention with superimposed and separated imagery: Implications for head-up displays (University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report ARL-91-4/NASA-HUD-91-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
12. Lauber, J. K., Bray, R. S., Harrison, R. L., Hemingway, J. C., & Scott, B. C. (1982). An operational evaluation of head-up displays for civil transport aircraft (NASA Tech. Paper 1815). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
13. Martin-Emerson, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1992). The vertical visual field and implications for the head-up display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1408-1412). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
14. Naish, J. M. (1964). Combination of information in superimposed visual fields. Nature, 202, 641-646.
15. Naish, J. M. (1979). A review of some head-up display formats (NASA Tech. Paper 1499). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
16. Naish, J. M., & Miller, D. L. (1980). An experimental evaluation of head-up display formats (NASA Tech. Paper 1550). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
17. Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480-494.
18. Weintraub, D. J., & Ensing, M. J. (1992). The book of HUD: A head-up display state of the art report (CSERIAC State of the Art Report). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Lab.
19. Weintraub, D. J., Haines, R. F., & Randle, R. J. (1984). The utility of head-up displays: Eye-focus versus decision time. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting (pp. 529-533). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
21. Wickens, C. D., Haskell, I., & Harte, K. (1989). Ergonomic design for perspective flight-path displays. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 9(4), 3-8.
22. Wickens, C. D., & Long, J. (1995). Object vs. space-based models of visual attention: Implications for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 179-193.
23. Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.