Golem and Enhancement: Parental Cognitions and Their Children's Scholastic Achievement Behavior Patterns in Physics;Golem und Enhancement: Elternkognitionen und das schulische Leistungshandeln in Physik

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 135-147

  Ziegler, Albert ^a   Broome, Patrick ^b   Heller, Kurt A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Enhancement effect; Golem effect; Parental cognitions; Physics; Self concept

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033444307     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//1010-0652.13.3.135     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Babad, E. Y., Inbar, J. & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, galatea and the golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 459-474.
2. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Beerman, L., Heller, K. A. & Menacher, P. (1992). Mathe: nichts für Mädchen? Begabung und Geschlecht am Beispiel von Mathematik, Naturwissenschaft und Technik. Bern: Huber.
4. Benbow, C. P. & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441.
5. Bonnett, D. G. (1982). On post-hoc blocking. Educational Psychological Measurement, 42, 35-39.
6. Breitkopf, L. (1985). Die Hilflosigkeitsskala. Diagnostika, 31, 324-332.
7. Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 631-661.
8. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Coleman, L. M., Jussim, L. & Abraham, J. (1987). Students' reactions to teacher evaluations: The unique impact of negative feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1051-1070.
10. Dweck, C. S. (1989). Motivation. In A. Lesgold & R. Glaser (Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education (pp. 85-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
12. Eccles, J. (1985). Why doesn't Jane run? Sex-differnces in educational and occupational patterns. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O. Brien (Eds.), The gifted and the talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 251-291). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
13. Eccles, J. C. & Wigfield, A. (1985). Teachers expectations and student motivation. In J. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expecatancies (pp. 185-226). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Eccles, J. E., Meece, J. L., Adler, T. F. & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Sex differences in attributional patterns and learned helplessness? Sex Roles, 8, 421-432.
15. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
16. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.
17. Eccles, J. S., Arberton, A., Buchanan, C. M., Jacobs, J., Flanagan, C., Harol, R., MacIver, D., Midgley, C., Reuman, D. & Wigfield, A. (1993). School and familiy effects on the ontogeny of children's interests, self-perceptions and activity choices. In R. Dienstbier & J. E. Jacobs (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 145-208). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E. & Harold, R. (1992). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183-201.
19. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S. & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children's academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 104-113.
20. Gordon, R. A. (1968). Issues in multiple regression. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 592-616.
21. Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154.
22. Hannover, B. & Bettge, S. (1993). Mädchen und Technik. Hogrefe: Göttingen.
23. Heller, K. A., Gaedike, A. K. & Weinläder, H. (1985). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest 4-13 +. Weinheim: Beltz.
24. Heller, K. A. & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in math and natural sciences: Can attributional retraining change the unfavorable situation of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210.
25. Heller, K. A. & Ziegler, A. (1997). Gifted females: A cross-cultural study. In R. Li, J. Chan & J. Spinks (Eds.), Maximizing potential: Lengthening and strengthening our stride (pp. 242-246). Hong Kong: Social Science Research.
26. Judd, C. M. & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Jones, S. C. (1973). Self and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theories versus consistnecy theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 185-199.
28. Jussim, L. & Eccles, J. S. (1995a). Naturally occuring interpersonal expectancies. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947-961.
29. Jussim, L. & Eccles, J. S. (1995b). Are teacher expectations biased by students' gender, social class, or ethnicity? In Y. T. Lee, L. Jussim & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 245-271). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
30. Korte, D. (1992). Gender differences in science achievement in 10 countries Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
31. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. & Sanders, C. R. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 693-707). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
32. Madon, S., Jussim, L. & Eccles, J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 791-809.
33. Marjoribanks, K. (1979). Familiy environments. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Educational enviroments and effects (pp. 15-37). Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
34. Raymond, C. L. & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Gender differences in mathematics: A function of parental support and student sex typing? Developmental Psychology, 22, 808-819.
35. Schneewind, K. A. & Pausch, H. P. (1990). Entwicklung des Multidimensional Bereichsspezifischen Attributionsfragebogens für Kinder und Jugendliche (MBAFK). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 4, 97-104.
36. Shrauger, S. J. (1975). Responsses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 581-596.
37. Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
38. Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W. & Krull, D. S. (1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 782-791.
39. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S. & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York: Gerneral Learning Press.
40. Wünsche, P. & Schneewind, K. A. (1989). Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Selbst-und Kompetenzeinschätzungen bei Kindern (FSK-K). Diagnostika, 35, 217-235.
41. Ziegler, A., Broome, P. & Heller, K. A. (1998). Pygmalion im Mädchenkopf. Erwartungs-und Erfahrungseffekte keodukativen vs. geschlechtshomogenen Physikanfangsunterrichts. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 45, 2-18.
42. Ziegler, A., Heller, K. A. & Broome, P. (1996). Motivational preconditions for girls gifted and highly gifted in physics. High Ability Studies, 7, 129-143.
43. Ziegler, A. & Schober, B. (1996). Resultate eines Reattributionstrainings mit Mathematikschülerinnen und Schülern der 5. Klasse. In E. Witruk & G. Friedrich (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie im Streit um ein neues Selbstverständnis (S. 348-356). Landau: Empi-rische Pädagogik.
44. Ziegler, A. & Schober, B. (1997). Reattributionstrainings. Regensburg: Roderer.