Phytogeographical boundary between the Pannonicum and Hercynicum: A multivariate analysis of landscape in the Podyjí/Thayatal National Park, Czech Republic/Austria

Preslia

Volumn 71, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 1-19

  Chytrý, Milan ^a   Grulich, Vít ^a   Tichý, Lubomír ^a   Kouřil, Martin ^b  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b Admin of the Podyji Natl Pk   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Detrended correspondence analysis; Ellenberg indicator values; Flora; Grid map; Land classification; Potential natural vegetation

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY;

AUSTRIA; CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 0033401323     PISSN: 00327786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersson P.-A. & Weimarck G. (1996): Floristic patterns and phytogeography of Skåne, S Sweden. - Symb. Bot. Ups. 31: 239-264.
2. Batík P. (1992): Geologická mapa Národního parku Podyjí (Geological map of the Podyjí National Park). -Český geologický ústav, Praha.
3. Bruelheide H. (1995): Die Grünlandgesellschaften des Harzes und ihre Standortsbedingungen. Mit einem Beitrag zum Gliederungsprinzip auf der Basis von statistisch ermittelten Artengruppen. - Diss. Bot. 244: 1-338.
4. Bruelheide H. & Jandt U. (1995): Survey of limestone grassland by statistically formed groups of differential species. - Coll. Phytosoc. 23: 319-338.
5. Chytrý M. & Tichý L. (1998): Phenological mapping in a topographically complex landscape by combining a field survey with an irradiation model. - Appl. Veget. Sci. 1: 225-232.
6. Chytrý M. & Vicherek J. (1995): Lesní vegetace Národního parku Podyjí/Thayatal. Die Waldvegetation des Nationalparks Podyjí/Thayatal. - Academia, Praha.
7. Culek M. (ed.) (1996): Biogeografické členění České republiky (Biogeographical land classification of the Czech Republic). - Enigma, Praha.
8. Dostál J. (1957): Fytogeografické členění ČSSR (Phytogeographical land classification of Czechoslovakia). -Sborn. Čs. Společ. Zeměp. 62: 1-18.
9. Dostál J. (1960): The phytogeographical regional distribution of the Czechoslovak flora. - Sborn. Čs. Společ. Zeměp. 65: 193-202.
10. Drude O. (1902): Der herzynische Florenbezirk. - W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
11. Ehrendorfer F. (1973): Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Ed. 2. - G. Fischer, Stuttgart.
12. Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W. & Paulißen D. (1992): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Ed. 2. - Scr. Geobot. 18: 1-258.
13. Grulich V. (1997): Atlas rozšíření cévnatých rostlin Národniho parku Podyjí/Thayatal. Verbreitungsatlas der Gefäßpflanzen des Nationalparks Podyjí/Thayatal. - Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
14. Hayek A. (1923): "Pontische" und "pannonische" Flora. - Österr. Bot. Z. 72: 231-235.
15. Heikkinen R. K., Birks H. J. B. & Kalliola R. J. (1998): A numerical analysis of the mesoscale distribution pat-terns of vascular plants in the subarctic Kevo Nature Reserve, northern Finland. - J. Biogeogr. 25: 123-146.
16. Hill M. O. (1979): DECORANA. A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. - Cornell University, Ithaca.
17. Hill M. O. (1991): Patterns of species distribution in Britain elucidated by canonical correspondence analysis. -J. Biogeogr. 18: 247-255.
18. Kadmon R. & Danin A. (1997): Floristic variation in Israel: a GIS analysis. - Flora 192: 341-345.
19. McLaughlin S. P. (1986): Floristic analysis of the southwestern United States. - Great Basin Nat. 46: 46-65.
20. McLaughlin S. P. (1989): Natural floristic areas of the western United States. - J. Biogeogr. 16: 239-248.
21. Meusel H., Jäger E. & Weinert E. (1965): Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Vol. 1. - G. Fischer, Jena.
22. Myklestad A. (1993): The distribution of Salix species in Fennoscandia - a numerical analysis. - Ecography 16: 329-344.
23. Myklestad A. & Birks H. J. B. (1993): A numerical analysis of the distribution patterns of Salix species in Europe. - J. Biogeogr. 20: 1-32.
24. Niklfeld H. (1964): Zur xerothermen Vegetation im Osten Niederösterreichs. - Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 103/104: 152-181.
25. Niklfeld H. (1993): Pflanzengeographische Charakteristik Österreichs. - In: Mucina L., Grabherr G. & Ellmauer T. (eds.), Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs I. Anthropogene Vegetation, p. 43-75, G. Fischer, Jena/Stuttgart/New York.
26. Oksanen J. & Minchin P. R. (1997): Instability of ordination results under changes in input data order: explanations and remedies. - J. Veget. Sci. 8: 447-454.
27. Pedersen B. (1990): Distributional patterns of vascular plants in Fennoscandia: a numerical approach. - Nord. J. Bot. 10: 163-189.
28. Podani J. (1993): SYN-TAX-pc. Computer programs for multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics. Version 5.0. - Scientia Publishing, Budapest.
29. Skalický V. (1988): Regionálně fytogeografické členění (Phytogeographical land classification). - In: Hejný S. & Slavík B. (eds.), Květena České socialistické republiky 1 (Flora of the Czech Socialistic Republic), p. 103-121, Academia, Praha.
30. R Base 8.0. - SPSS Inc., Chicago.
31. ter Braak C. J. F. & Šmilauer P. (1998): CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). - Centre for Biometry, Wageningen.
32. Vesecký A., Petrovič Š., Briedoň V. & Karský V. (eds.) (1958): Atlas podnebi Československé republiky (Climatic atlas of the Czechoslovak Republic). - Ústřední sprá va geodesie a kartografie, Praha.
33. Wheeler G. A., Cushing E. J., Gorham E., Morley T. & Ownbey G. B. (1992): A major floristic boundary in Minnesota: an analysis of 280 taxa occurring in the western and southern portions of the state. - Can. J. Bot. 70: 319-333.
34. Wohlgemuth T. (1996a): Ein floristischer Ansatz zur biogeographischen Gliederung der Schweiz. - Bot. Helv. 106: 227-260.
35. Wohlgemuth T. (1996b): Biogeographical regionalization of Switzerland based on floristic data: How many species are needed? - Biodiv. Lett. 3: 180-191.