Binning schemes for partition-based compound selection

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 10-18

  Bayley, Martin J ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES; DRUG DESIGN; HYDROGEN BONDING; LIGANDS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0033386157     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1093-3263(99)00016-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shemetulskis N.E., Dunbar J.B., Dunbar B.W., Moreland D.W., Humblet C. Enhancing the diversity of a corporate database using chemical database clustering and analysis. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design. 9:1995;407-416.
2. Hudson B.D., Hyde R.M., Rahr E., Wood J. Parameter based methods for compound selection from chemical databases. Quant. Struct.-Activity Relat. 15:1996;285-289.
3. Patterson D.E., Cramer R.D., Ferguson A.M., Clark R.D., Weinberger L.E. Neighbourhood behaviour A useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors . J. Med. Chem. 39:1996;3049-3059.
4. Matter H. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases A validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors . J. Med. Chem. 40:1997;1219-1229.
5. Willett P. Using computational tools to analyze molecular diversity. DeWitt S.H., Czarnik A.W. A Practical Guide to Combinatorial Chemistry. 1997;17-48 American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
6. Brown R.D. Descriptors for diversity analysis. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design. 7/8:1997;31-49.
7. Higgs R.E., Bemis K.G., Watson I.A., Wikel J.H. Experimental designs for selecting molecules from large chemical databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;861-870.
8. Nilakantan R., Bauman N., Haraki K.S. Database diversity assessment New ideas, concepts and tools . J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design. 11:1997;447-452.
9. Clark R.D. OptiSim An extended dissimilarity selection method for finding diverse representative subsets . J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;1181-1188.
10. Gillet V.J., Willett P., Bradshaw J. The effectiveness of reactant pools for generating structurally diverse combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;731-740.
11. Mason J.S., Pickett S.D. Partition-based selection. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design. 7/8:1997;85-114.
12. Pearlman R.S., Smith K.M. Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design. 9/10/11:1998;339-353.
13. Mason J.S., McLay I.M., Lewis R.A. Applications of computer-aided drug design techniques to lead generation. Dean P.M., Jolles G., Newton C.G. New Perspectives in Drug Design. 1994;225-253 Academic Press, London.
14. Cummins D.J., Andrews C.W., Bentley J.A., Cory M. Molecular diversity in chemical databases comparison of medicinal chemistry knowledge bases and databases of commercially available compounds . J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;750-763.
15. Pickett S.D., Mason J.S., McLay I.M. Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores Pharmacophore-derived queries (PDQ) . J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;1214-1223.
16. Nievergelt J., Hinterberger H., Sevcik K.C. The grid file An adaptable, symmetric multikey file structure . ACM Trans. Database Syst. 9:1984;38-71.
17. Bentley J.L. Multidimensional binary search trees in database applications. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. SE-5:1979;333-340.
18. Carpenter M.P. Similarity of Pratt's measure of class concentration to the Gini index. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 30:1979;108-110.
19. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;1996, 572-1996, 584.
20. Information regarding the World Drug Index is available at http://www.derwent.com/.
21. Information regarding the National Cancer Institute's AIDS database is available at http://epnws1.ncifcrf.gov:2345/dis3d/aids_screen/aidspub.html.
22. Information regarding Tripos Receptor Research Limited is available at http://wavespace.waverider.co.uk/~receptor/.
23. Information regarding MOLCONN-Z is available at http://www.eslc.vabiotech.com/.
24. Gillet V.J., Willett P., Bradshaw J. Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:1998;165-179.
25. Snarey M., Terret N.K., Willett P., Wilton D.J. Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. J. Mol. Graphics Model. 15:1997;372-385.
26. Taylor R. Simulation analysis of experimental design strategies for screening random compounds as potential new drugs and agrochemicals. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35:1995;59-67.
27. Young, S.S., Farmen, M., and Rusinko, A. Random versus rational. Which is better for general compound screening? At http://www.awod.com/netsci/Issues/Aug96/feature3.html.
28. Spencer R.W. Diversity analysis in high throughput screening. J. Biomol. Screening. 2:1997;69-70.
29. Wikel J.H., Higgs R.E. Applications of molecular diversity analysis in high throughput screening. J. Biomol. Screening. 2:1997;65-67.