Percutaneous reduction and instrumentation of thoracolumbar fractures in the open MRI: Experimental investigations and clinical results;Perkutane instrumentierung von thorakolumbalen wirbelfrakturen im offenen magnetresonanz-tomographen: Experimentelle voruntersuchungen und klinische erfahrungen

Aktuelle Traumatologie

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 229-236

  Verheyden, P ^a   Katscher, S ^a   Schulz, Th ^a   Lill, H ^a   Glasmacher, S ^a   Schmidt, F ^a   Josten, Ch ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE SCREW; FRACTURE REDUCTION; IMPLANT; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; SOFT TISSUE; SURGEON; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TRAUMATOLOGY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; VERTEBRAL CANAL;

EID: 0033373512     PISSN: 00446173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zach G, Morscher E. Analysis of 75 operated thoracolumbar fractures and fracture dislocations with an without neurological deficit. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986; 105: 100-112
2. Czerovionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW, Mark LP, Hendrix LE, Strandt JA, Williams AL, Haugton VM. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. Amer J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 1149-1155
3. Degreif J, Wenda K, Ahlers J, Ritter G. Experimentelle Erprobung der intraoperativen Wirbelsäulensonographie. Unfallchirurg 1992; 95: 493-497
4. Degreif J, Wenda K, Runkel M, Ritter G. Die Rotationsstabilität der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsäule nach interlaminärem Schallfenster, Hemilaminektomie und Laminektomie. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 250-255
5. Dick W. The "Fixateur interne" as a versatile implant for spine surgery. Spine 1987; 9: 882-900
6. Frazzini V. Kagetsu N, Johnson C, Destian S. Internally stabilized spine: Optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 1997; 204: 268-272
7. Fritzsche S, Thull R, Haase A. Reduction of artifacts in magnetic resonance images by using optimized materials for diagnostic devices and implants. Biomed Techn 1995; 40: 29-33
8. Heindel W. Friedman G, Bunke J, Thomas B, Firsching R, Ernestus RI. Artifacts in MR imaging after surgical intervention. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 596-599
9. Ladd ME, Erhart P, Debatin JF, Romanowski BJ, Boesinger P, McKinnon GC. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 646-651
10. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mäkitalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. Spine 1997; 22: 1254-1258
11. Leclet H. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant. Europ Spine J 1994; 3: 240 - 245
12. Lewin J, Duerk J, Jain V, Petersilge C, Chao C, Haaga J. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. Amer J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1337-1345
13. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3: 329-343
14. Mueller P, Stark D, Simeone J, Saini S, Butch R, Edelman R, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci J. MR-guided aspiration biopsy needle: design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986; 161: 605-609
15. Peterman SB, Hoffman JC, Malko JA. Magnetic resonance artifact in the postoperative cervical spine. A potential pitfall. Spine 1991; 16: 721-725
16. Petersilge C, Lewin J, Duerk J, Yoo J, Ghaneyem A. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. Amer J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1213-1218
17. Rudisch A, Kremser C, Peer S, Kathrein A, Judmeier W, Daniaux H. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonanz imaging of patients with spinal fusion - A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences. Spine 1998; 23: 692-699
18. Vaccaro A, Chesnut R, Scuderi G, Healy JF, Massie JB, Garfin SR. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1994; 19: 1237-1242
19. Wang J. Yu W, Sandhu H, Tam V, Delamarter R. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine 1998; 23: 1684-1688
20. Wenda K, Hachenberger R, Thiem N. Postoperalives MR als Entscheidungsgrundlage für rein dorsale Instrumentation oder zusärzliche ventrale Fusion bei thoracolumbalen Frakturen. Hefte zu Der Unfallchirurg 1997; 268: 184-187