Hydraulic Properties and Uncertainty Analysis for an Unconfined Alluvial Aquifer

Ground Water

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 845-854

  Chen, Xunhong ^a   Goeke, James ^a   Summerside, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULICS; IRRIGATION;

HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNCONFINED ALLUVIAL AQUIFER;

AQUIFERS;

EID: 0033324038     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01183.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beck, J.W., and K.J. Arnold. 1977. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Boulton, N.S. 1970. Analysis of data from pumping tests in unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 10: 369-378.
3. Chen, X.H., 1998. Assessment of hydraulic parameters from an alluvial aquifer near Grand Island, Nebraska. Journal of American Water Resources Assoc. 34, no. 3: 603-616.
4. Chen, X.H., and J.F. Ayers. 1998. Hydraulic parameters determined from two analytical solutions. Ground Water 36, no. 5: 783-791.
5. Dagan, G. 1967. A method of determining the permeability and effective porosity of unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Water Resources Research 3, no. 4: 1059-1071.
6. Geraghty and Miller Inc. 1996. AQTESOLV for Windows, version 1.15. Reston, Virginia: Geraghty and Miller.
7. Marie, J.R., and K.J. Hollett. 1996. Determination of hydraulic characteristics and yield of aquifers underlying Vekol Valley. Arizona, using several classical and current methods. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2453.
8. Moench, A.F. 1994. Specific yield as determined by type-curve analysis of aquifer-test data Ground Water 32: 6: 949-957.
9. Moench, A.F. 1995. Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer. Ground Water 33, no. 3: 378-384.
10. Moench, A.F. 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research 33, no. 6: 1397-1407.
11. Neuman, S.P. 1974. Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed aquifer response. Water Resources Research 10, no. 2: 303-312.
12. Neuman, S.P. 1975. Analysis of pumping-test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research 11, no. 2: 229-342.
13. Nwankwor, G.I., J.A. Cherry, and R.W. Gillham. 1984. A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water 22, no. 6: 764-772.
14. Nwankwor, G.I., R.W. Gillham, G. van der Kamp, and F.F. Akindunni. 1992. Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer Field evidence of delayed drainage. Ground Water 30, no. 5: 690-700.
15. Prickett, T.A. 1965. Type-curve solution to aquifer tests under water-table conditions. Ground Water 3, no. 1: 5-14.
16. Sridharan, K., R. Ramaswamy, and N.S. L. Rao. 1985. Identification of parameters in unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 79: 73-81.
17. Walpole, R.E., R.H. Myers, and S.L. Myers. 1998. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
18. Wenzel, L.K. 1942. Methods for determining permeability of water-bearing materials. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 887.
19. Yager, R.M. 1993. Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of a riverbed and aquifer system on the Susquehanna River in Broome County, New York. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2387.