Determination of hydraulic characteristics and yield of aquifers underlying Vekol Valley, Arizona, using several classical and current methods

US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper

Volumn 2453, Issue , 1996, Pages 1-51

  Marie, James R ^a   Hollett, Kenneth J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INFILTRATION; TRANSMISSIVITY;

AQUIFER; CONDUCTIVE ZONE; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; INFILTRATION RATE; TRANSMISSIVITY; UNCONFINED AQUIFER;

USA, ARIZONA, VEKOL VALLEY;

EID: 0030426107     PISSN: 00831131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boulton, N.S., 1954, The drawdown of the water table under non-steady conditions near a pumped well in an unconfined formation: Institute of Civil Engineers Proceedings, v. 3, p. 564-79.
2. _1955, Unsteady radial flow to a pumped well allowing for delayed yield from storage: Rome, International Association of Scientific Hydrological Publications 37, p. 472-477,
3. _1963, Analysis of data from nonequilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage: Institute of Civil Engineers, Proceedings, v. 26, p. 469-482.
4. Bouwer, Herman, 1980, Deep percolation and groundwater management, in Proceedings of the Deep Percolation Symposium, May 1-2, 1980, Scottsdale, Arizona: Phoenix, Arizona Department of Water Resources Report 1, p. 13-19.
5. Cooper, H.H., Jr., 1963, Type curves for nonsteady radial flow in an infinite leaky artesian aquifer, in Bentall, Ray, compiler, Shortcuts and Special Problems in Aquifer Tests: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1545-C, p. C48-C55.
6. Cooper, H.H., Jr., and Jacob, C.E., 1946, A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 27, no. 4, p. 526-534.
7. Cuff, M.K., 1984, Map showing geohydrologic conditions in the Vekol Valley, Pinal and Maricopa Counties, Arizona 1983: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4270, 1 sheet.
8. Davis, S.G., 1984, An explanation on gravity survey of the south basin, Vekol Valley, Pima and Maricopa Counties, Arizona: Tucson, University of Arizona, master's thesis, 99 p.
9. Dockter, R.D.and Keith, W.J., 1978, Reconnaissance geologic map of Vekol Mountains quadrangle, Arizona: U.S.Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-931, 1 sheet.
10. DeCook, K.H., and Wilson, L.G., 1980, Groundwater recharge from urban runoff and irrigation returns, in Proceedings of the Deep Percolation Symposium, May 1-2, 1980, Scottsdale, Arizona: Phoenix, Arizona Department of Water Resources Report 1, p. 53-64.
11. Franzoy, Corey and Associates with Harza Engineering Company, 1983, Hydrogeology and preliminary well field design for North Vekol Valley Ak-Chin well field design study for the Ak-Chin Indian Community, Maricopa County, Arizona: Franzoy, Corey and Associates, v. 1 and 2, 295 p.
12. _1984, Hydrogeology and preliminary well field design for south Vekol Valley Ak-Chin well field design study for the Ak-Chin Indian Community, Maricopa County, Arizona: Franzoy, Corey and Associates, v. 1 and 2, 303 p.
13. Hantush, M.S., 1962, Drawdown around a partially penetrating well: American Society of Civil Engineers Transactions, v. 127, p. 268-283.
14. _1964, Hydraulics of wells: Advanced Hydroscience, v. 1, p. 281-432.
15. Hollett, K.J., and Marie, J.R., 1987, Simulation of the ground-water-flow system and proposed withdrawals in the northern part of Vekol Valley, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4340, 68 p.
16. Lohman, S.W., 1972, Ground-water hydraulics: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 707, 70 p.
17. Marie, J.R., 1985, Streamflow losses, consequent flow through a thick unsaturated zone, and recharge to an unconfined aquifer [abs.]: American Society of Civil Engineers, July 1985, p. 486-487.
18. Matlock, D.T., 1981, Simulative models for the analysis of ground-water flow in Vekol Valley, the Waterman Wash area, and the Bosque area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-77, 77 p.
19. Moench, A.F., 1993, Computation of type curves for flow to partially penetrating wells in water-table aquifers: Ground Water, v. 31, no. 6, p. 966-971.
20. Neuman, S.P., 1972, Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 8, no. 4, p. 1031-1045.
21. _1973, Supplementary comments on theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 9, no. 4, p. 1102-1103.
22. _1974, Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 10, no. 2, p. 303-312.
23. _1975, Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 11, no. 2, p. 329-342.
24. Prickett, T.A., 1965, Type curve solution to aquifer tests under water-table conditions: Ground Water, v. 3, no. 3, p. 5-14.
25. Reynolds, S.J., 1988, Geologic map of Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey Map 26, scale 1;1,000,000.
26. Robertson, F.N., 1991, Geochemistry of ground water in alluvial basins of Arizona and adjacent parts of Nevada, New Mexico, and California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1406-C, 90 p.
27. Stallman, R.W., 1965, Effects of water-table conditions on water-level changes near pumping wells: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 1, no. 2, p. 295-312.
28. Weeks, E.P., 1969, Determining the ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability by aquifer-test analysis: American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, v. 5, no. 1, p. 196-214.
29. Wilson, R.P., 1979, Availability of water on Federal land near the Ak-Chin Indian Reservation, Arizona - A reconnaissance study: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 79-1165, 36 p.