Aquifer properties determined from two analytical solutions

Ground Water

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 783-791

  Chen, Xunhong ^a   Ayers, Jerry F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; WATER WELLS;

NEUMAN METHOD; SINGLE-WELL ANALYSIS; UNCONFINED ALLUVIAL AQUIFERS;

AQUIFERS;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; AQUIFER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; PUMPING;

GRAND ISLAND; NEBRASKA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032168198     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02196.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Beck, J.W., and K.J. Arnold. 1977. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Boulton, N.S. 1963. Analysis of data from non-equilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage. Proc. Inst. of Civil Engineers 26: 469-482.
3. Boulton, N.S. 1970. Analysis of data from pumping tests in unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 10: 369-378.
4. Chen, X.H., and J.F. Ayers. 1997. Utilization of the Hantush solution for simultaneous determination of aquifer parameters. Ground Water 35, no. 5: 751-756.
5. Gill, E.G., W. Murray, and M.H. Wright. 1981. Practical Optimization. San Diego: Academic Press.
6. Mania, J., and M. Sucche. 1978. Automatic analysis of pumping-test data: Application to the Boulton and Hantush hypothesis. Journal of Hydrology 37: 185-194.
7. McElwee, C.D. 1980. Theis parameter evaluation from pump tests by sensitivity analysis. Ground Water 18, no. 1: 56-60.
8. Moench, A.F. 1993. Computation of type curves for flow to partially penetrating wells in water-table aquifers. Ground Water 31, no. 6: 966-971.
9. Moench, A.F. 1994. Specific yield as determined by type-curve analysis of aquifer-test data. Ground Water 32, no. 6: 949-957.
10. Moench, A.F. 1995. Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer. Ground Water 33, no. 3: 378-384.
11. Moench, A.F. 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research 33, no. 6: 1397-1407.
12. Neuman, S.P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research 8, no. 4: 1031-1044.
13. Neuman, S.P. 1974. Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed aquifer response. Water Resources Research 10, no. 2: 303-312.
14. Neuman, S.P. 1975. Analysis of pumping-test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research 11, no. 2: 229-342.
15. Neuman, S.P. 1979. Perspective on "delayed yield." Water Resources Research 15, no. 4: 899-907.
16. Nwankwor, G.I., J.A. Cherry, and R.W. Gillham. 1984. A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water 22, no. 6: 764-772.
17. Nwankwor, G.I., R.W. Gillham, G. van der Kamp, and F.F. Akindunni. 1992. Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: Field evidence of delayed drainage. Ground Water 30, no. 5: 690-700.
18. Prickett, T.A., 1965. Type-curve solution to aquifer tests under water-table conditions. Ground Water 3, no. 1: 5-14.
19. Sridharan, K., R. Ramaswamy, and N.S.L. Rao. 1985. Identification of parameters in unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 79: 73-81.
20. Wenzel, L.K. 1942. Methods for determining permeability of water-bearing materials. USGS Water-Supply Paper 887.