A method for integrated planning of timber production and biodiversity: A case study

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1183-1191

  Carlsson, Mattias ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRODUCTION;

EID: 0033306019     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x99-058     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen, J.C. 1986. Multiobjective regional forest planning using the noninferior set estimation (NISE) method in Tanzania and the United States. For. Sci. 32: 517-533.
2. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71: 355-366.
3. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M., and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat association. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
4. Burton, P.J., Balisky, A.C., Coward, L.P., Cumming, S.G., and Kneeshaw, D.D. 1992. The value of managing for biodiversity. For. Chron. 68: 225-237.
5. Clark, J.S. 1991. Disturbance and population structure on the shifting mosaic landscape. Ecology, 72: 1119-1137.
6. Dovers, S.R., and Handmer, J.W. 1995. Ignorance, the precautionary principle, and sustainability. AMBIO, 24: 92-96.
7. Eriksson, L.O. 1983. Long range forestry planning - a case study of a forest in a transition period. Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Rep. No. 154.
8. Esseen, P-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., and Sjöberg, K. 1992. Boreal forests - the focal habitats of Fennoscandia. In Ecological principles of nature conservation. Edited by L. Hansson. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 252-313.
9. Franklin, J.F. 1993. The fundamentals of ecosystem management with applications in the Pacific Northwest. In Defining sustainable forestry. Edited by G.H. Aplet, N. Johnson, J.T. Olson, and V.A. Sample. Island Press, Covelo, Calif. pp. 127-144.
10. Fries, C., Carlsson, M., Dahlin, B., Sallnäs, O., and Lämås, T. 1998. Conceptual landscape planning models for multi-objective forestry in Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 159-167.
11. Hansson, L. 1992. Landscape ecology of boreal forests. TREE, 7: 299-302.
12. Helle, P., Helle, T., and Lindén, H. 1994. Capercaillie (Tetro urogallus) lekking sites in fragmented Finnish forest landscape. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 386-396.
13. Hof, J.G., and Joyce, L.A. 1993. A mixed integer linear programming approach for spatially optimizing wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 39: 835-844.
14. Howard, A. 1991. A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1649-1659.
15. Hunter, M.L. 1990. Islands and fragments. In Wildlife, forests, and forestry. Edited by D. Delaney. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. pp. 115-156.
16. Kelly, J.W., Kent, B.M., Johnson, K.N., and Jones, D.B. 1986. FORPLAN version 1: user's guide. USDA Forest Service, Land Management Planning Systems Section, Washington, D.C.
17. Korhonen, P. 1987. VIG - a visual interactive support system for multi-criteria decision making. Belg. J. Oper. Res. Stat. Comput. Sci. 27: 3-15.
18. Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., and Wallenius, J. 1992. Multiple criteria decision support - a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 63: 361-375.
19. Lämås, T. 1996. Forest management planning for biodiversity and timber production. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Dissertation 3.
20. Lewandowski, A., Kreglewski, T., Rogowski, T., and Wierzbicki, A. 1989. Decision support systems of DIDAS family. In Aspiration based decision support systems. Edited by A. Lewandowski and A. Wierzbicki. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 21-47.
21. Liljelund, L-E., Pettersson, B., and Zackrisson, O. 1992. Skogsbruk och biologisk mångfald. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 86: 227-232.
22. Mendoza, A.C. 1987. Goal programming formulations and extensions: an overview and analysis. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 575-581.
23. Næsset, E. 1997a. A spatial decision support system for long-term forest management planning by means of linear programming and a geographical information system. Scand. J. For. Res. 12: 77-88.
24. Næsset, E. 1997b. Geographical information systems in long-term forest management and planning with special reference to preservation of biological diversity: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 93: 121-136.
25. Nalli, A., Nuutinen, T., and Päivinen, R. 1996. Site-specific constraints in integrated forest planning. Scand. J. For. Res. 11: 85-96.
26. National Board of Forestry. 1994. Skogsvårdslagens handbok. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
27. Nilsson, G.S. 1992. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition-natural and man-made features. In Ecological principles of nature conservation. Edited by L. Hansson. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 373-393.
28. Nilsson, N.E. 1982. An alley model for forest resources planning. In Statistics in theory and practice-essays in honour of Bertil Matérn. Edited by B. Ranneby. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Section of Forest Biometry, Umeå. pp. 189-207.
29. Östlund, L. 1993. Exploitation and structural changes in the northern Swedish boreal forest 1800-1992. Department of Forest Vegetation Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeä, Diss. For. Veg. Ecol. No. 4. Various paging.
30. Pimm, S.L., and Gilpin, M.E. 1989. Theoretical issues in conservation biology. In Perspectives in ecological theory. Edited by J. Roughgarden, R.M. May, and S.A. Levin. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 287-305.
31. Rülcker, C., Angelstam, P., and Rosenberg, P. 1994. Ecological forestry planning: a proposed planning model based on the natural landscape. SkogForsk, Uppsala, Sweden, Rep. No. 8.
32. Steuer, R.E., and Choo, E.-U. 1983. An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Math. Program. 26: 326-344.
33. Stjernquist, O. 1994. Järnet. In Husby ringen i Dalarna. Dalarnas museum, Falun, Sweden, pp. 75-82.
34. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbund. 1998. Certifiering av skogsbruk. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbund, Danderyd, Sweden.
35. Swanson, F.J., and Franklin, J.F. 1992. New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest forests. Ecol. Appl. 2: 262-274.
36. United Nations. 1992. Convention on biological diversity. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. United Nations, New York.
37. Wilhelmsson, E. 1991. Naturvårdshänsyn minskar avverkning-smöjligheterna. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Skogsfakta No. 13.
38. Yoshimoto, A., Brodie, D.J., and Sessions, J. 1994. A new heuristic to solve spatially constrained long-term harvest scheduling problems. For. Sci. 40: 365-396.