A spatial decision support system for long–term forest management planning by means of linear programming and a geographical information system

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 77-88

  Næsset, Erik ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Gis; Lp; Strategic planning; Treatment schedule simulation

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

EID: 0030660140     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589709355387     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anon. 1987. Handbok for planlegging i skogbruket, 223Oslo, Norway:Landbruksforlaget. ISBN 82–529–1139–0. (In Norwegian.)
2. Anon. 1989. SP–systemet, Oslo, Norway:Skog–data A.S. (In Norwegian.)
3. Anon. 1991. Census of Agriculture and Forestry 1989, Vol. VII, Forestry—Outfield Resources, 130Norway:Central Bureau of Statistics. ISBN 82–537–3622–3.
4. Barrett, T. M., and Davis, L. S., Predicting the spatial effects of forest management alternatives over multiple time periods. Proceedings of GIS 94, 8th Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems. Vancouver, Canada. pp. 817–820. ISBN 0–662–21500–1.
5. Baskent, E. Z., and Jordan, G. A., 1991. Spatial wood supply simulation modelling. For. Chron., 69:610–621.
6. Bergen, S. D., Fridley, J. L., Ganter, M. A., and Schiess, P., 1995. Predicting the visual impact of forest operations. J. For., 93(2):33–37.
7. Blingsmo, K. R., and Veidahl, A., 1992. Functions for gross price of standing spruce and pine trees, Research Paper of Skogforsk 8/92 23 ISBN 82–7169–534–7. (In Norwegian with English summary.)
8. Bulger, D., and Hunt, H., 1991. The forest management decision support system project. For. Chron., 67:622–628.
9. Clements, S. E., Dallain, P. L., and Jamnick, M. S., 1990. An operational, spatially constrained harvest scheduling model. Can. J. For. Res., 20:1438–1447.
10. Covington, W. W., Wood, D. B., Young, D. L., Dykstra, D. P., and Garret, L. D., 1988. TEAMS:a decision support system for multiresource management. J. For., 86(8):25–33.
11. Dahlin, B., and Salinas, O., 1993. Harvest scheduling under adjacency constraints—a case study from the Swedish sub–alpine region. Scand. J. For. Res., 8:281–290.
12. Davis, F. W., Stoms, D. M., Estes, J. E., and Scepan, J., 1990. An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sys., 4:55–78.
13. Davis, R. G., and Martell, D. L., 1993. A decision support system that links short–term silvicultural operating plans with long–term forest–level strategic plans. Can. J. For. Res., 23:1078–1095.
14. Dewhurst, S. M., Covington, W. W., and Wood, D. B., A flexible decision support architecture for ecosystem based forest management. Proceedings of GIS 93, 7th Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems. Vancouver, Canada. pp. 93–97. ISBN 0–662–20392–5.
15. Gobakken, T., 1995. Konsekvenser ved bruk av en land–skapsøkologisk planleggingsmodell i skogbruket, 61Norway:Dept. of Forest Sciences, Agric. Univ. Ås, Master of Science Thesis
16. Gustafson, E. J., and Crow, T. R., 1994. Forest management alternatives in the Hoosier National Forest. J. For., 92(8):28–29.
17. Hoen, H. F., and Eid, T., 1990. A model for analysis of treatment strategies for a forest applying standwise simulations and linear programming, Ås, Report 9/90 35Norwegian For. Res. Inst. (In Norwegian with English summary.)
18. Hof, J. G., and Joyce, L. A., 1993. A mixed integer linear programming approach for spatially optimizing wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci., 39:816–834.
19. Irland, L. C., 1994. Getting from here to there. Implementing ecosystem management on the ground. J. For., 92(8):12–17.
20. Jonsson, B., Jacobsson, J., and Kallur, H., 1993. The Forest Management Planning Package Theory and application. Stud. For. Suec., 189:56 ISBN 91–576–4698–8.
21. Jordan, G. A., Baskent, E. Z., and Whittaker, G. A., Spatial forest modeling and landscape management. Proceedings of GIS 95, 9th Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems. Vancouver, Canada. pp. 473–480. ISBN 1–882610–15–6.
22. Lachowski, H. M., Wirth, T., Maus, P., and Avers, P., 1994. Remote sensing and GIS:their role in ecosystem management. J. For., 92(8):39–40.
23. LaGro, J., Jr. 1991. Assessing patch shape in landscape mosaics. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 57:285–293.
24. Lappi, J., 1992. JLP:a linear programming package for management planning, Research Papers 414 134The Finnish For. Res. Inst. ISBN 951–40–1218–6.
25. Li, H., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, J., and Spies, T. A., 1993. Developing alternative forest cutting patterns:a simulation approach. Landscape Ecol., 8:63–75.
26. Lockwood, C., and Moore, T., 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints:a simulated annealing approach. Can. J. For. Res., 23:468–478.
27. Misund, G., Johansen, B. S., Hasle, G., and Haukland, J., Integration of geographical information technology and constraint reasoning—a promising approach to forest management. Proceedings of ScanGIS'95. The 5th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Systems. Trondheim, Norway. Edited by:Bjørke, J. T., pp. 42–56.
28. Næsset, E., 1997. Geographical information systems in long–term forest management planning with special reference to preservation of biological diversity:a review. For. Ecol. Manage, in press
29. Nelson, J., Brodie, J. D., and Sessions, J., 1991. Integrating short–term, area–based logging plans with long–term harvest schedules. For. Sci., 37:101–122.
30. Nichols, J., An approach to examining the trade–offs between pine marten carrying capacity and timber production on the Superior National Forest. Proceedings of GIS 94, 8th Annual Symposium on Geographic Information Systems. Vancouver, Canada. pp. 609–613. ISBN 0–662–21500–1.
31. O'Hara, A. J., Faaland, B. H., and Bare, B. B., 1989. Spatially constrained timber harvest scheduling. Can. J. For. Res., 19:715–724.
32. Probst, J. R., and Crow, T. R., 1991. Integrating biological diversity and resource management. J. For., 89(2):12–17.
33. Pukkala, T., Nuutinen, T., and Kangas, J., 1995. Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning. Landscape Urban Plann., 32:185–195.
34. Rose, D., McDill, M., and Hoganson, H., 1992. Development of an environmental impact statement of statewide forestry programs:a Minnesota case study. The Compiler, 10(4):18–27.
35. Sample, V. A., 1994. Building partnerships for ecosystem management on mixed ownership landscapes. J. For., 92(8):41–44.
36. Skinner, C. N., 1995. Change in spatial characteristics of forest openings in the Klamath Mountains of northwestern California, USA. Landscape Ecol., 10:219–228.
37. Weintraub, A., and Cholaky, A., 1991. A hierarchical approach to forest planning. For. Sci., 37:439–460.
38. Yoshimoto, A., and Brodie, J. D., 1994. Short– and long–term impacts of spatial restrictions on harvest scheduling with reference to riparian zone planning. Can. J. For. Res., 24:1617–1628.
39. Yoshimoto, A., Brodie, J. D., and Sessions, J., 1994. A new heuristic to solve spatially constrained long–term harvest scheduling problems. For. Sci., 40:365–396.