A review of conceptual landscape planning models for multiobjective forestry in Sweden

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 159-167

  Fries, Clas ^a   Carlsson, Mattias ^a   Dahlin, Bo ^a   Lämås, Tomas ^a   Sallnäs, Ola ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MODELLING APPRACOH; MULTIOBJECTIVE FORESTRY; SPIRITUAL VALUES; TIMBER PRODUCTION;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0031800951     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x97-204     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169-211.
2. Aldentun, Y. 1995. Conservation in the small-scale forestry sector - a case study at the landscape level in central Sweden. The Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala. Rep. 10. [In Swedish with English summary ]
3. Angelstam, P. 1997. Landscape analysis as a tool for the scientific management of biodiversity. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Edited by L. Hansson. Ecol Bull. (Copenhagen), 46: 140-170.
4. Angelstam, P., and Pettersson, B. 1997. Principles of present Swedish forest biodiversity management. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Edited by L. Hansson. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen), 46: 191-203.
5. Angelstam, P., and Rosenberg, P. 1993. Aldrig Sällan Ibland Ofta. Skog & Forskning (Danderyd, Sweden), 1/93: 28-33. [In Swedish.]
6. Aronsson, M., Hallingbäck, T., and Mattsson, J.-E. (Editors), 1995. Swedish red data book of plants. Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. [In Swedish with English summary.]
7. Baker, W.L. 1992. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecol. 7: 181-194.
8. Berg, Å., and Pärt, T. 1994. Abundance of farmland birds on arable and set-aside fields at forest edges. Ecography, 17: 147-152.
9. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M., and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened forest plant, animal and fungus species in Sweden - distribution and habit at preferences. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
10. Berglund, B.E. (Editor). 1992. The cultural landscape during 6000 years in southern Sweden - the Ystad project. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen), 41.
11. Boyle, T.J.B. 1991. Biodiversity of Canadian forests: current status and future challenges. For. Chron. 4: 444-453.
12. Bradshaw, R.H.W. 1993. Forest response to Holocene climatic change - equilibrium or non-equilibrium? In Climate change and human impact on the landscape. Edited by F.M. Chambers. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 57-65.
13. Bradshaw, R.H.W., Gemmel, P., and Björkman, L. 1995. Development of nature-based silvicultural models in southern Sweden: the scientific background. For. Landscape Res. 1: 95-110.
14. Canham, C.D., and Loucks, O.L. 1984. Catastrophic windthrow in the presettlement forests of Wisconsin. Ecology, 65: 803-809.
15. Dahlin, B. 1994. Landskapsplanering i praktiken - några olika arbetsmodeller. [Landscape planning in practice - some working models.] Skogsfakta Konferens, 20: 137-146. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. [In Swedish.]
16. Drakenberg, B. 1994. Ekologisk planering i det ekrika Sydsverige. [Ecological planning in the oak rich south of Sweden.] Skogsfakta Konferenz, 20: 176-185. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. [In Swedish.]
17. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., and Sjöberg, K. 1997. Boreal forests. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Edited by L. Hansson. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen) 46: 16-47.
18. Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Franklin, J.-F. 1992. Scientific basis for new perspectives in forests and streams. In Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. Edited by R.J. Naiman, Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 25-72.
21. Franklin, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol. Appl. 3: 202-205.
22. Fries, C., and Lärnås, T. 1996. Different management regimes in a Swedish boreal forest landscape: economic and ecological effects. In Forest management planning for biodiversity and timber prodation. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Rep. 3. pp. 1-45.
23. Fries, C., Jobansson, O., Pettersson, B., and Simonsson, P. 1997. Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 94: 89-103.
24. Gustafsson, L., and Hansson, L. 1997. Corridors as conservation tool. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Edited by L. Hansson. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen), 46: 182-190.
25. Gustavsson R., and Ingelög, T. 1994. Det nya landskapet. Skogsstyrelsens förlag, Jönköping. [In Swedish.]
26. Hansson, L., and Angelstam, P. 1991. Landscape ecology as an theoretical basis for nature conservation. Landscape Ecol. 5: 191-201.
27. Harris, L.D. 1984. The fragmented forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Hobbs, R.J. 1992, The role of corridors in conservation: solution or bandwagon? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 389-392.
29. Hunter, M.L., Jr., Jacobson, G., Jr., and Webb, T., III. 1988. Paleoecology and the coarse-filter approach to maintaining biological diversity. Conserv. Biol. 2: 375-385.
30. Karström, M. 1992. One step ahead - a presentation. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 86: 103-114. [In Swedish with English abstract.]
31. Kohh, E. 1975. A study of fires and hard pan in the forests of Älvdalen. Sver Skogsvardsförenings Tidskrift, 73: 299-366. [In Swedish with English summary.]
32. Komulainen, M. 1995. Landscape management in forestry. In Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. Edited by M. Hytönen. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa, Finlaud. pp. 295-320.
33. Lämås, T. 1996. Forest mangement planning for biodiversity and timber production. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Rep. 3.
34. Liljelund, L.-E., Pettersson, B., and Zackrisson, O. 1992. Skogsbruk och biologisk mågfald. Sven. Bot Tidskr. 86: 227-232. [In Swedish.]
35. Lindbladh, M., and Bradshaw, R.H.W. 1995. The development and demise of a Medieval forest-meadow system at Linnaeus' birthplace in southern Sweden: implications for conservation and forest history. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 4: 153-160.
36. Lindén, G., and Nillius, E. 1996. Forest owner cooperation for maintaining conservation values: a case study within private forestry in the Province of Västerbotten, Sweden. Department of Silviculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Examensarbete i skogsskötsel 1996-1. [In Swedish with English summary.]
37. Lucas, O.W.R. 1991. The design of forest landscapes. Oxford University Press, New York.
38. MacArthur, R.H., and Wilson, E.O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
39. Mladenoff, D.J., White, M.A., Pastor, J., and Crow, T.R. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes for biodiversity design and management. Ecol. Appl. 3: 293-305.
40. Nilsson, S.G. 1997. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Edited by L. Hansson. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen), 46: 61-71.
41. Nitare, J., and Norén, M. 1992. Woodland key habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the Swedish National Board of Forestry. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 86: 219-226. [In Swedish with English summary.]
42. Noon, B., McKelvey, K., and Murphy, D. 1997. Developing an analytical context for multispecies conservation planning. In The ecological basis for conservation. Edited by S.T.A. Picket, R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 43-59.
43. Noss, R.F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience, 33: 700-706.
44. Noss, R.F., and Harris, L.D. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: preserving diversity in all scales. Environ. Manag. 10: 299-309.
45. Ohlson, M., Söderström, L., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O., and Hermansson, J. 1997. Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv. 81: 221-231.
46. Oliver, C.D. 1992. A landscape approach. Achieving and maintaining biodiversity and economic productivity. J. For. 90(9): 20-25.
47. Peters, R.S., Waller, D.M., Noon, B., Picket, S.T.A., Murphy, D., Cracraft, J., Kiester, R., Kulhlmann, W., Houck, O., and Snape, W.J., III 1997. Standard scientific procedures for implementing ecosystem management on public lands. In The ecological basis for conservation. Edited by S.T.A. Picket, R.S, Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 320-336.
48. Picket, S.T.A., and Thomson, J.N, 1978. Patch dynamics and design of nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 13: 27-37.
49. Rebertus, A.J., Kitzberger, T., Veblen, T.T., and Roovers, L.M. 1997. Blowdown history and landscape patterns in the Andes Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Ecology, 78: 678-692.
50. Romme, W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 199-221.
51. Rülcker, C., Angelstam, P., and Roseaberg, P. 1994. Ecological forest planning: a proposed planning model based on the natural landscape. The Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala, Rep. 8. (In Swedish with English summary.]
52. Scott, J.M., Csuti, B., Jacobi, J.D., and Estes, F.J.E. 1987. Species richness, a geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity. BioScience, 37: 782-788.
53. Stora Skog. 1993. Ecological landscape planning. The Grangärde area as a model. Falun, Sweden.
54. Swanson, F.J., Kratz, T.K., Caine, N., and Woodmansee, R.G. 1988. Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience, 38: 92-98.
55. Tartowski, S.L., Alien, E.B., Barret, N.E., Berkowitz, A.R., Colwell, R.K., Groffman, P.M., Harte, J., Possingham, H,P., Pringle, C.M., Strayer, D.L., and Tracy, C.R. 1997. Integration of species and ecosystem approaches to conservation. In The ecological basis for conservation. Edited by S.T.A. Picket, R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 187-192.
56. Törnquist, K. 1996. Ecological landscape planning in Swedish forestry. In Proceedings of the Nordic-Baltic Research Course: Integrating Environmental Values into Forest Planning - Baltic and Nordic Prespectives, 27 June - 2 July 1996, Räpina, Estonia. Edited by P. Hyttinen and A. Nilson. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland. EFI Proc. No. 13. pp. 189-196.
57. Wiens, J.A. 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. In Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Edited by L. Hansson, L. Fahrig, and G, Merriam. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1-26.
58. Zackrisson, O. 1977. Influence of forest fires on the north Swedish boreal forest. Qikos, 29: 22-32.