Wear-testing of a temporomandibular joint prosthesis: UHMWPE and PTFE against a metal ball, in water and in serum

Biomaterials

Volumn 20, Issue 16, 1999, Pages 1471-1478

  Van Loon, J P ^a   Verkerke, G J ^b   De Bont, L G M ^a   Liem, R S B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

PTFE; Temporomandibular joint; Temporomandibular joint prosthesis; UHMWPE; Wear; Wear testing

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENES; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES; WATER; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

BALL SOCKET ARTICULATION; DEIONIZED WATER; SERUM BASE SOLUTION; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT PROSTHESIS; WEAR TESTING;

JOINT PROSTHESES;

LUBRICATING AGENT; METAL; POLITEF; POLYETHYLENE; STAINLESS STEEL; WATER;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MECHANICS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SERUM; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; METALS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PHYSICS; POLYETHYLENES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; WATER;

EID: 0033178857     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00042-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. [1] Amstutz H, Campbell P, Kossovsky N, Clarke IC. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992;276:7-17.
2. [2] Willert H-G, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990;258:95-107.
3. [3] Mjøberg B. Theories of wear and loosening in hip-prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:361-71.
4. [4] prEN 12563 Non active surgical implants - Joint replacement implants - Specific requirements for hip joint replacement implants. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization, 1996.
5. [5] prEN 12564 Non-active surgical implants - Joint replacement implants - Specific requirements for knee joint replacement implants. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization, 1996.
6. [6] van Loon JP, de Bont LGM, Boering G. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses. Review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:984-96.
7. [7] Kent JN, Block MS, Halpern J, Fontenot MG. Update on the vitek partial and total temporomandibular joint systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:408-15.
8. [8] Kabo JM, Gebhard JS, Loren G, Amstutz H. In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Jt Surg 1993;75B:254-8.
9. [9] Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Jt Surg 1990;72A:518-28.
10. [10] Atkinson JR, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Wroblewski BM. Laboratory wear tests and clinical observations of the penetration of femoral heads into acetabular cups in total replacement hip joints III: the measurement of internal volume changes in explanted Charnley sockets after 2-16 yr in vivo and the determination of wear factors. Wear 1985;104:225-44.
11. [11] Wang A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Engrs, Part H 1996;210:141-55.
12. [12] Fisher J, Dowson D. Tribology of total artificial joints. Proc Inst Mech Engrs, Part H 1991;205:73-9.
13. [13] Bragdon CR, O'Conner DO, Lowenstein JD, Jasty M, Syniuta WD. The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Engrs, Part H 1996;210:157-65.
14. [14] van Loon JP, Otten E, Falkenstrom CH, de Bont LGM, Verkerke GJ. Loading of a unilateral temporomandibular joint prosthesis. A three-dimensional mathematical study. J Dent Res 1998;77:1939-47.
15. [15] ISO 7206-2. Implants for surgery - Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Part 2: bearing surfaces made of metallic and plastic materials, 1987.
16. [16] McKellop HA, Rostlund TV. The wear behavior of ion-implanted Ti6A14V against UHMW Polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1413-25.
17. [17] ISO TR 9326. Implants for surgery - Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Guidance for laboratory evaluation of change of form of bearing surfaces. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 1989.
18. [18] Good VD, Clarke IC, Anissian L. Water and bovine serum lubrication compared in simulator PTFE/CoCr wear model. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;33:275-83.
19. [19] McKellop HA, Clarke IC, Markolf K, Amstutz H. Friction and wear properties of polymer, metal and ceramic prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a multichannel screening device. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;15:619-53.
20. [20] Streicher RM. Tribology in medicine: testing and optimization of material combinations for endoprostheses. Med Orth Tech 1988;108:1-12.
21. [21] Wang A, Essner A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. Comparison of the size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris produced by a hip joint simulator under serum and water lubricated conditions. Biomaterials 1996;17:865-71.
22. [22] McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995;311:3-20.
23. [23] Saikko VO, Paavolainen PO, Slatis P. Wear of the polyethylene acetabular cup. Metallic and ceramic heads compared in a hip simulator. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64:391-402.
24. [24] Pappas MJ, Makris G, Buechel FF. Titanium nitride ceramic film against polyethylene. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995;317:64-70.
25. [25] Charnley J. An artificial bearing in the hip joint: implications in biological lubrication. Fed Proc 1966;25:1079-81.
26. [26] Rostlund TV, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T, McKellop HA. Wear of ion-implanted pure titianium against UHMWPE. Biomaterials 1989;10:176-81.
27. [27] Clarke IC, Gustafson A, Jung H, Fujisawa A. Hip-simulator ranking of polyethylene wear. Comparison between ceramic heads of different sizes. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:128-32.