Analysis of interaction between chaperonin GroEL and its substrate using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Cytometry

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 247-253

  Pack, Chan Gi ^a   Nishimura, Goro ^a   Tamura, Mamoru ^a   Aoki, Katsuhiko ^b   Taguchi, Hideki ^b   Yoshida, Masasuke ^b   Kinjo, Masataka ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chaperonin; Cytochrome c; Dissociation constant; Electrostatic interaction; Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; GroEL; Heat shock protein; Homogeneous solution; Pepsin; lactalbumin

Indexed keywords

ALPHA LACTALBUMIN; CHAPERONIN; CYTOCHROME C; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; PEPSIN A;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ELECTRICITY; ENZYME DENATURATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033168398     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19990701)36:3<247::aid-cyto15>3.0.co;2-%23     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Elson EL, Magde D. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy I. Conceptual basis and theory. Biopolymers 1974;13:1-17.
2. Aragón SR, Pecora R. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy as a probe of molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 1976;64:1791-1803.
3. Thompson NL. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In: Lakowicz J. editor Topics in fluorescence spectroscopy. Volume 1, Techniques. New York: Plenum Press; 1991;337-374.
4. Rigler R, Mets Ü, Widengren J, Kask P. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with high count rate and low background: analysis of translational diffusion. Eur Biophys J 1993;22:169-175.
5. Eigen M, Rigler R. Sorting single molecules: application to diagnostics and evolutionary biotechnology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:5740-5747.
6. Kinjo M, Rigler R. Ultrasensitive hybridization analysis using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 1995;2.3:1795-1799.
7. Björling S, Kinjo M, Földes-Papp Z, Hagman E, Thyberg P, Rigler R. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of enzymatic DNA polymerization. Biochemistry 1998;57:12971-12978.
8. Kinjo M, Nishimura G, Koyama T, Mets Ü, Rigler R. Single-molecule analysis of restriction DNA fragments using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Anal Biochem 1998;260:166-172.
9. Palmer AG, Thompson NL. Molecular aggregation characterized by high order autocorrelation in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J 1987;52:257-270.
10. Thompson NL, Axelrod D. Immunoglobulin surface-binding kinetics studied by total internal reflection with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J 1983;43:103-114.
11. Rauer B, Neumann E, Widengren J, Rigler R. Fluorescence correlation spectrometry of interaction kinetics of tetramethylrhodamine α-bungarotoxin with Torpedo California acetylcholine receptor. Biophys Chem 1996;58:3-12.
12. Klingler J, Friedrich T. Site-specific interaction of thrombin and inhibitors observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J 1997;73:2195-2200.
13. Elite RJ, Haiti F-U. Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function. FASEB J 1996; 10:20-26.
14. Itzhaki LS, Otzen DE, Fersht AR. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 1995;34:14581-14587.
15. Katsumata K, Okazaki A, Tsurupa GP, Kuwajima K. Dominant forces in the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of α-lactalbumin by GroEL. J Mol Biol 1996;264:643-649.
16. Kuwajima K. The molten globule state of α-lactalbumin. FASEB J 1996;10:102-109.
17. Hayer-Hartl MK, Ewbank JJ, Creighton TE, Hartl F-U. Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates α-lactalbumin. EMBO J 1994;13:3192-3202.
18. Lin X, Loy JA, Sussman F, Tang J. Conformational instability of the N-and C-terminal lobes of porcine pepsin in neutral and alkaline solution. Protein Sci 1993;2:1383-1390.
19. Hoshino M, Kawata Y, Goto Y. Interaction of GroEL with Conformational states of horse cytochrome c. J Mol Biol 1996;262:575-587.
20. Fisher WR, Taniuchi H, Anfinsen CB. On the role of heme in the formation of the structure of cytochrome c. J Biol Chem 1973;248: 3188-3195.
21. Hamada D, Hoshino M, Kataoka M, Fink AL, Goto Y. Intermediate Conformational states of apo-cytochrome c. Biochemistry 1993;32: 10351-10358.
22. Aoki K, Taguchi H, Shindo Y, Yoshida M, Ogasahara K, Yutani K, Tanaka N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J Biol Chem 1997;272:32158-32162.
23. Katsumata K, Okazaki A, Kuwajima K. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of a-lactalbumin. J Mol Biol 1996;258:827-838.
24. Okazaki A, Ikura T, Nikaido K, Kuwajima K. The chaperonin GroEL does not recognize apo-α-lactalbumin in the molten globule state. Nat Struct Biol 1994;1:439-446.
25. Murai N, Taguchi H, Yoshida M. Kinetic analysis of interactions between GroEL and reduced α-lactalbumin. J Biol Chem 1995;270: 19957-19963.
26. Brazil BT, Ybarra J, Horowitz PM. Divalent cations can induce the exposure of GroEL hydrophobic surfaces and strengthen GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions. J Biol Chem 1998;273:3257-3263.