Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: Comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X-ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 87-110

  Philippopoulos, Marios ^a,b   Lim, Carmay ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Molecular dynamics simulation; NMR and X ray structures; Protein structure and dynamics; Ribonuclease HI; Rotamericity

Indexed keywords

RIBONUCLEASE H;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RIBONUCLEASE H, CALF THYMUS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; NEGIBACTERIA;

EID: 0033167995     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990701)36:1<87::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-R     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. McCammon JA, Harvey SC. Dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. p 1-234.
2. Brooks III CL, Karplus M, Pettitt BM. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988. p 1-259.
3. Sternberg MJE, Grace DEP, Phillips DC. Dynamic information from protein crystallography. J Mol Biol 1979;130:231-253.
4. Drenth J. Principles of protein X-ray crystallography. New York: Springer Verlag; 1994. p 1-304.
5. Kay LE, Gardner KH. Solution NMR spectroscopy beyond 25 kDa. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:722-731.
6. Palmer III AG. Probing molecular motion by NMR. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:732-737.
7. Wagner G. An account of NMR in structural biology. Nat Struct Biol, 1997; Oct. Suppl:841-844.
8. Brunger AT. Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. Nature 1992;355: 472-475.
9. Liu Y, Zhao D, Altman R, Jardetzky O. A systematic comparison of three structure determination methods from NMR data; dependence upon quality and quantity of data. J Biomol NMR 1992;2:373-388.
10. Zhao D, Jardetzky O. An assessment of the precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by NMR: dependence on distance errors. J Mol Biol 1994;239:601-607.
11. Brunger AT, Nilges M. Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMR-spectroscopy. Quart Rev Biophys 1993;26:49-125.
12. Clore GM, Robien MA, Gronenborn AM. Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 1993;231:82-102.
13. MacArthur MW, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Knowledge-based validation of protein structure coordinates derived by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994;4:731-737.
14. Brunger AT. X-ray crystallography and NMR reveal complementary views of structure and dynamics. Nat Struct Biol 1997; Oct. suppl:862-865.
15. Billeter M. Comparison of protein structures determined by NMR in solution and by X-ray diffraction in single crystals. Quart Rev Biophys 1992;25:325-377.
16. Wagner G, Hyberts SG, Havel TF. NMR structure determination in solution: a critique and comparison with X-ray crystallography. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1992;21:167-198.
17. Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Structures of protein complexes by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1995;30:351-385.
18. Clore GM, Gronenborn AM. Comparison of the solution nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray crystal structures of human recombinant interleukin-1β. J Mol Biol 1991;221:47-53.
19. Hyberts SG, Goldberg MS, Havel TF, Wagner G. The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures. Protein Sci 1992;1:736-751.
20. MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Conformational analysis of protein structures derived from NMR data. Proteins 1993;17:232-251.
21. Powers R, Clore GM, Garrett DS, Gronenborn AM. Relationships between the precision of high-resolution protein NMR structures, solution order parameters, and crystallographic B factors. J Magn Reson B 1993;101:325-327.
22. Smith JL, Hendrickson WA, Honzatko RB, Sheriff S. Structural heterogeneity in protein crystals. Biochemistry 1986;25:5018-5027.
23. 13C NMR relaxation analysis. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:9255-9264.
24. 13C cross-correlation NMR experiments: application to the N-terminal SH3 domain from drk. J Mol Biol 1998;276:939-954.
25. Lipari G, Szabo A, Levy RM. Protein dynamics and NMR relaxation: comparison of simulations and experiment. Nature 1982;300:197-198.
26. Peng JW, Wagner G. Mapping spectral density functions using heteronuclear NMR relaxation measurements. J Magn Reson 1992;98:308-332.
27. Wagner G. NMR relaxation and protein mobility. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1993;3:748-753.
28. Wuthrich K. Protein structure determination in solution by NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 1990;265:22059-22062.
29. Janin J, Wodak S, Levitt M, Maigret B. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol 1978;125:357-386.
30. Bhat TN, Sasisekheran V, Vijayan M. An analysis of side-chain conformations in proteins. Int J Pept Protein Res 1979;13:170-184.
31. Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tertiary templates for proteins: use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 1987;193:775-791.
32. Dunbrack Jr RL, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993;230:543-574.
33. Schrauber H, Eisenhaber F, Argos P. Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1993;230:592-612.
34. Vasquez M. Modelling side-chain conformation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:217-221.
35. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack Jr RL. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
36. Carugo O, Argos P. Correlation between side chain mobility and conformation in protein structures. Protein Eng 1997;10:777-787.
37. Gelin BR, Karplus M. Sidechain torsional potentials and motion of amino acids in proteins: bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;72:2002-2006.
38. Gelin BR, Karplus M. Side-chain torsional potentials: effect of dipeptide, protein and solvent environment. Biochemistry 1979; 18:1256-1268.
39. Pascal SM, Yamazaki T, Singer AU, Kay LE, Forman-Kay JD. Structural and dynamic characterization of the phosphotyrosine binding region of an SH2 domain-phosphopeptide complex by NMR relaxation, proton exchange and chemical shift approaches. Biochemistry 1995;34:11353-11362.
40. Feng M-H, Philippopoulos M, MacKerell Jr AD, Lim C. Structural characterization of the phosphotyrosine binding region of a high affinity SH2 domain-phosphopeptide complex by molecular dynamics simulation and chemical shift calculations. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11265-11277.
41. 15N NMR relaxation measurements for main-chain and side-chain nuclei of hen egg white lysozyme. Biochemistry 1995;34:4041-4055.
42. 15N NMR relaxation measurements. J Am Chem Soc 1992;114:4934-4936.
43. Palmer III AG, Case DA. Molecular dynamics analysis of NMR relaxation in a zinc-finger peptide. J Am Chem Soc 1992;114: 9059-9067.
44. Post CB. Internal motional averaging and three-dimensional structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Mol Biol 1992;224:1087-1101.
45. 15N NMR relaxation measurements with a molecular dynamics simulation: backbone dynamics of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain. Proteins 1993;17:375-390.
46. Berndt KD, Guntert P, Wuthrich K. Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long-time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water. Proteins 1996;24:304-313.
47. Brunne RM, Berndt KD, Guntert P, Wuthrich K, van Gunsteren WF. Structure and internal dynamics of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in aqueous solution from long-time molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 1995;23:49-62.
48. Chandrasekhar I, Clore GM, Szabo A, Gronenborn AM, Brooks BR. A 500-ps molecular dynamics simulation study of interleukin-1β in water. J Mol Biol 1992;226:239-250.
49. Li A, Daggett V. Investigation of the solution structure of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 using molecular dynamics: comparison to X-ray crystallographic and NMR data. Protein Eng 1995;8: 1117-1128.
50. Philippopoulos M, Lim C. Molecular dynamics simulation of E. coli ribonuclease HI in solution. Correlation with NMR and X-Ray data and insights into biological function. J Mol Biol 1995;254:771-792.
51. Smith LJ, Mark AE, Dobson CM, van Gunsteren WF. Comparison of MD simulations and NMR experiments for hen lysozyme. Analysis of local fluctuations, cooperative motions, and global changes. Biochemistry 1995;34:10918-10931.
52. Smith PE, van Schaik RC, Szyperski T, Wuthrich K, van Gunsteren WF. Internal mobility of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in solution: A comparison of NMR spin relaxation measurements and molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1995;246:356-365.
53. Fox T, Kollman PA. The application of different solvation and electrostatic models in molecular dynamics simulations of ubiquitin: how well is the X-ray structure maintained? Proteins 1996;25:315-334.
54. Philippopoulos M, Mandel AM, Palmer III AG, Lim C. Accuracy and precision of NMR relaxation experiments and MD simulations for characterizing protein dynamics. Proteins 1997;28:481-493.
55. Fujiwara M, Kato T, Yamazaki T, Yamasaki K, Nagayama K. Solution structure of ribonuclease HI from E. coli. In press.
56. Yang W, Hendrickson WA, Crouch RJ, Satow Y. Structure of ribonuclease H phased at 2.05-Å resolution by MAD analysis of the selenomethionyl protein. Science 1990;249:1398-1405.
57. Katayanagi K, Miyagawa M, Matsushima M, et al. Three-dimensional structure of ribonuclease H from E. coli. Nature 1990;347:306-309.
58. Katayanagi K, Miyagawa M, Matsushima M, et al. Structural details of ribonuclease H from Escherichia coli as refined to an atomic resolution. J Mol Biol 1992;223:1029-1052.
59. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4: 187-217.
60. MacKerell Jr. AD, Bashford D, Bellot M, et al. Self-consistent parameterization of biomolecules for molecular modeling and condensed phase simulations. FASEB J 1992;6:
61. Steinbach PJ, Brooks BR. New spherical-cutoff methods for long-range forces in macromolecular simulation. J Comp Chem 1994;15:667-683.
62. Braun W, Go N. Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance constraints. J Mol Biol 1985;186:611-626.
63. Endo S, Wako H, Nagayama K, Go N. A new version of DADAS (Distance Analysis in Dihedral Angle Space) and its performance. New York: Plenum Press; 1991.
64. Momany FA, McGuire RF, Burgess AW, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen-bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occuring amino acids. J Phys Chem 1975;79:2361-2381.
65. Nemethy G, Pottle MS, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides. IX. Updating of geometrical parameters, non-bonded interactions, and hydrogen-bond interactions for the naturally occuring amino acids. J Phys Chem 1983;87:1883-1887.
66. Guntert P, Braun W, Wuthrich K. Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J Mol Biol 1991;217:517-530.
67. Yamazaki T, Yoshida M, Nagayama K. Complete assignments of magnetic resonances of ribonuclease H from Escherichia coli by double-and triple-resonance 2D and 3D NMR spectroscopies. Biochemistry 1993;32:5656-5669.
68. Tropp J. Dipolar relaxation and nuclear Overhauser effects in non-rigid molecules: the effect of fluctuating internuclear distances. J Chem Phys 1980;72:6035-6043.
69. Pearlman DA, Kollman PA. Are time-averaged restraints necessary for nuclear magnetic resonance refinement? A model study for DNA. J Mol Biol 1991;220:457-479.
70. Carpenter GA, Grossberg S. ART 2: Self-organization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns. Appl Opt 1987;26:4919-4930.
71. Brooks III CL, Karplus M. Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 1983;79:6312.
72. Karpen ME, Tobias DT, Brooks III CL. Statistical clustering techniques for analysis of long molecular dynamics trajectories. I. Analysis of 2.2 ns trajectories of YPGDV. Biochemistry 1993;32: 412-420.
73. Tronrud DE, Ten Eyck LF, Matthews BW. An efficient general-purpose least-squares refinement program for macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallogr A 1987;43:489-501.
74. Janin J. Errors in three dimensions. Biochimie 1990;72:705-709.
75. Dunbrack Jr. RL, Karplus M. Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains. Nat Struct Biol 1994;1:334-340.
76. Philippopoulos M, Lim C. Protein dynamics: molecular dynamics simulation, NMR spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. In: Michalewicz M. editor. Advances in computational life sciences, Vol. 2: Humans to proteins. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; 1998. p 167-182.
77. Mandel AM, Akke M, Palmer III AG. Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: Correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme. J Mol Biol 1995;246:144-163.
78. 15N-NMR relaxation analysis and molecular dynamics simulation: Examination of dynamic models. Biochemistry 1995;34:6587-6601.
79. James MNG, Sielecki AR. Structure refinment of penicillopepsin at 1.8å resolution. J Mol Biol 1983;183:299-361.
80. Nicholson LK, Kay LE, Baldisseri DM. Dynamics of methyl groups in proteins as studied by proton-detected 13C NMR spectroscopy. Application to the leucine residues of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 1992;31:5253-5263.
81. Giacovazzo C. Fundamentals of Crystallography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992. p 1-654.
82. Glusker JP, Lewis M, Rossi M. Crystal structure analysis for chemists and biologists. New York: VCH publishers; 1994. p 1-854.
83. Kanaya S, Katayanagi K, Morikawa K, Inoue H, Ohtsuka E, Ikehara M. Effect of mutagenesis at each of five histidine residues on enzymatic activity and stability of ribonuclease H from Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 1991;198:437-440.
84. 1, a case study. J Mol Biol 1997;266:400-423.
85. Oda Y, Iwai S, Ohtsuka M, Ishikawa E, Ikehara M, Nakamura H. Binding of nucleic acids to E. coli RNase HI observed by NMR and CD spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:4690-4695.
86. Kanaya S, Ikehara M. Functions and structures of ribonuclease H enzymes. Subcell Biochem Proteins-Struct Function, and Engineering 1995;24:377-422.
87. Kanaya S, Katsuda C, Kimura S. Stabilization of Escherichia coli ribonuclease H by introduction of an artificial disulfide bond. J Biol Chem 1991;266:6038-6044.
88. Nakamura H, Oda Y, Iwai S. How does RNase H recognize a DNA-RNA hybrid? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:11535-11539.
89. Fedoroff OY, Salazar M, Reid BR. Structure of a DNA:RNA hybrid duplex. Why RNase H does not cleave pure RNA. J Mol Biol 1993;233:509-523.
90. Kanaya S, Katsuda-Nakai C, Ikehara M. Importance of the positive charge cluster in E. coli ribonuclease HI for the effective binding of the substrate. J Biol Chem 1991;266:11621-11627.
91. Abseher R, Horstink L, Hilbers CW, Nilges M. Essential spaces defined by NMR structure ensembles and molecular dynamics simulation show significant overlap. Proteins 1998;31:370-382.
92. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:412-425.
93. Widmer H, Widmer A, Braun W. Extensive distance geometry calculations with different NOE calibrations: new criteria for structure selection applied to sandiostatin and BPTI. J Biomol NMR 1993;3:307-324.
94. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF. Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Phys Lett 1989;157:289-294.
95. Scheek RM, Torda RE, Kemmink J, van Gunsteren WF. Computational aspects of the study of biological macromolecules by NMR. New York: Plenum Press; 1991. p 1-464.
96. Pearlman DA. How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches. J Biomol NMR 1994;4:1-16.
97. Constantine KL, Mueller L, Andersen NH, et al. Structural and dynamic properties of a β-hairpin forming linear peptide. 1. Modeling using ensemble-averaged constraints. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:10841-10854.
98. Scheek RM, van Nuland NAJ, de Groot BL, Amadei A. Structure from NMR and molecular dynamics: distance restraining inhibits motion in the essential subspace. J Biomol NMR 1995;5:106-111.
99. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF. Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. J Mol Biol 1990;214:223-235.
100. Bonvin AMJJ, Brunger AT. Conformational variability of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures. J Mol Biol 1995;250: 80-93.
101. Bonvin AMJJ, Brunger AT. Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures? J Biomol NMR 1996;7:72-76.
102. Hunenberger PH, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. Fluctuation and cross-correlation analysis of protein motions observed in nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1995;252:492-503.
103. Knegtel RMA, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J Mol Biol 1997;266:424-440.