Limits of NMR structure determination using variable target function calculations: Ribonuclease T1, a case study

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 266, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 400-423

  Pfeiffer, Stefania ^a   Karimi Nejad, Yasmin ^a   Rüterjans, Heinz ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conformational equilibria in proteins; NMR structure determination; Ribonuclease T1; Structure selection

Indexed keywords

RIBONUCLEASE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DISULFIDE BOND; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BOND; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 0031581812     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0784     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. 1. Assignment of His-40 peak and analysis of active site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 73:1976;133-140.
2. 1. Biochemistry. 18:1979;18-24.
3. 1-2′GMP complex at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 263:1988;15358-15368.
4. Berndt K. D., Güntert P., Wüthrich K. Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long-time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 24:1996;304-313.
5. Billeter M. Comparison of protein structures determined by NMR in solution and by X-ray diffraction in single crystals. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 25:1992;325-377.
6. Billeter M., Schaumann Th., Braun W., Wüthrich K. Restrained energy refinement with two different algorithms and force fields of the structure of the α-amylase inhibitor tendamistat determined by NMR in solution. Biopolymers. 29:1990;695-706.
7. 1H]-COSY-experiments. J. Biomol. NMR. 2:1992;257-274.
8. Bodenhausen G., Ruben D. J. Natural abundance nitrogen-15 NMR by enhanced heteronuclear spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Letters. 69:1980;185-189.
9. Boelens R., Koning T. M. G., Kaptein R. Determination of biomolecular structures from proton-proton NOE's using a relaxation matrix approach. J. Mol. Struct. 173:1988;299-311.
10. Bonvin A. M. J. J., Brünger A. Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures? J. Biomol. NMR. 7:1996;72-76.
11. Bonvin A. M. J. J., Boelens R., Kaptein R. Time- and ensemble-averaged direct NOE restraints. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994;143-149.
12. Borgias B. A., James T. L. MARDIGRAS-A procedure for matrix analysis of relaxation for discerning geometry of an aqueous structure. J. Magn. Reson. 87:1990;475-487.
13. Braun W., Gõ N. Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance restraints. A new efficient algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 186:1985;611-626.
14. Brüschweiler R., Case D. A. Characterisation of biomolecular structure and dynamics by NMR cross relaxation. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 26:1994;27-58.
15. Case D. A., Dyson H. J., Wright P. E. Use of chemical shifts and coupling constants in nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies on peptides and proteins. Methods Enzymol. 239:1995;392-416.
16. Clifford A. A. A Handbook of Multivariate Error Analysis. 1973;Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London.
17. Constantine K. L., Mueller L., Andersen N. H., Tong H., Wandler C. F., Friedrichs M. S., Bruccoleri R. E. Structural and dynamic properties of a β-hairpin forming linear peptide. 1. Modeling using ensemble-averaged constraints. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;10841-10854.
18. 1H-NMR spectra of ferrichrome peptides. I. The non-amide protons. Biopolymers. 17:1978a;617-636.
19. 15N spin-spin couplings in alumichrome. Biopolymers. 17:1978b;2727-2742.
20. Džakula Z., Westler W. M., Markley J. L. Continuous probability distribution (CUPID) analysis of potentials for internal rotations. J. Magn Reson. ser. B. 111:1996;109-126.
21. 13C-labeled proteins. J. Biomol. NMR. 2:1992a;583-590.
22. Eggenberger U., Schmidt P., Sattler M., Glaser S. J., Griesinger G. Frequency-selective decoupling with recursively expanded soft pulses in multinuclear NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 100:1992b;604-610.
23. Fennen J., Torda A. E., van Gunsteren W. F. Structure refinement with molecular dynamics and Boltzmann-weighted ensembles. J. Biolmol. NMR. 6:1995;163-170.
24. 15N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102:1980;2533-2539.
25. 13C NMR relaxation analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;10855-10864.
26. 1and its complex with 2′GMP studied by two-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994a;61-78.
27. 1and its 2′GMP complex using molecular dynamics simulations and NMR relaxation data. J. Biol. Struct. Dynam. 11:1994b;1377-1402.
28. αH coupling constants on protein structure determination by NMR. J. Magn. Reson ser. B. 104:1994;99-103.
29. Gemmecker G., Jahnke W., Kessler H. Measurement of fast proton exchange rates in isotopically labeled compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:1993;11620-11621.
30. Güntert P., Wüthrich K. Improved efficiency of protein structure calculation from NMR data using the program DIANA with redundant dihedral angle constraints. J. Biomol. NMR. 1:1991;447-456.
31. Güntert P., Braun W., Wüthrich K. Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from NMR data using the program DIANA and supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J. Mol. Biol. 217:1991;517-530.
32. Harbison G. S. Interference between J -couplings and cross-relaxation in solution NMR spectroscopy: consequences for macromolecular structure determination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:1993;3026-3027.
33. Havel T. F. An evaluation of computational strategies for use in the determination of protein structure from distance constraints obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 56:1991;43-78.
34. 1catalyzed specific RNA hydrolysis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam. 1:1983;523-538.
35. 1and 3′GMP suggests geometry of enzymatic reaction path. An X-ray study. Eur. J. Biochem. 218:1993;1005-1012.
36. 1and its complexes with nucleotides. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 7:1988;757-761.
37. Hyberts S. G., Goldberg M. S., Havel T. F., Wagner G. The solution stucture of eglin c based on measurements of many NOE's and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures. Protein Sci. 1:1992;736-751.
38. 13C-labelled protein. J. Magn. Reson. 86:1990;204-209.
39. 1. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 89:1981;1185-1195.
40. 1studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry. 24:1985;1013-1020.
41. Jeener J., Meier B. H., Bachmann P., Ernst R. R. Investigation of exchange processes by two-dimensional NMR spectrsocopy. J. Chem. Phys. 71:1979;4546-4553.
42. 1und ihrer Komplexe mit 2′ und 3′ GMP. PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Germany.
43. 3J coupling constants. Biochemistry. 33:1994;5481-5492.
44. Kay L. E., Keifer P., Saarinen T. Pure absorption gradient enhanced heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy with improved sensitivity. J. Am . Chem. Soc. 114:1992;10663-10665.
45. Keepers J. W., James T. A theoretical study of distance determination from NMR. Two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 57:1984;404-426.
46. Kemmink J., Van Mierlo C. P. M., Scheek R. M., Creighton T. E. Local structure due to an aromatic-amide interaction observed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in peptides related to the N terminus of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1993;312-322.
47. Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moass D. S., Thornton J. PROCHECK, a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystalog. 24:1991;946-950.
48. Liu H., Thomas P. D., James T. L. Averaging of cross-relaxation rates and distances for methyl, methylene and aromatic ring protons due to motion or overlap: extraction of accurate distances iteratively via relaxation matrix analysis of 2D NOE spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 98:1992;163-175.
49. Liu H., Kumar A., Weisz K., Schmitz U., Bishop K. D., James T. L. Extracting accurate distances and bounds from 2D NOE exchangeable proton peaks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:1993;1590-1591.
50. Liu Y., Zhao D., Altman R., Jardetzky O. A systematic comparison of three structure determination methods from NMR data: dependence upon quality and quantity of data. J. Biomol. NMR. 2:1992;373-388.
51. London R. E. A theoretical evaluation of the significance of scalar relaxation in coupled spin- 1 2 systems in macromolecules. J. Magn. Reson. 86:1990;410-415.
52. Ludvigsen S., Poulsen F. Positive φ-angles in proteins by NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR. 2:1992;227-233.
53. Ludvigsen S., Anderson K. V., Poulsen F. M. Accurate measurement of coupling constants from two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of proteins and determination of φ-angles. J. Mol. Biol. 217:1991;731-736.
54. 1: analysis of the effect of solvent on the structure, fluctuations and active site of the free enzyme. Biochemistry. 27:1988;4547-4556.
55. 1: comparison of the free enzyme and 2′GMP-enzyme complex. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 6:1989;20-31.
56. 1at pH 5.3. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1073:1991;357-365.
57. 1. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1991;4848-4852.
58. Marion D., Bax A. Baseline distortion in real-Fourier-transform NMR spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 79:1988;352-356.
59. 1H-spin, spin-coupling constants in proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 113:1983;967-974.
60. Marion D., Ikura M., Tschudin R., Bax A. Rapid recording of 2D NMR spectra without phase cycling. Application to the study of hydrogen exchange in proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 85:1989;399.
61. 1with free recognition and catalytic site: crystal structure analysis at 1.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 222:1991;335-352.
62. 1. PhD thesis, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
63. Nanzer A. P., van Gunsteren W. F., Torda A. E. Parametrization of time-averaged distance restraints in MD simulations. J. Biomol. NMR. 6:1995;313-320.
64. 1activity as is the case for ribonuclease A. Biochemistry. 26:1987;8620-8624.
65. Norwood T. J. Measurement of the scalar coupling and transverse relaxation time of doublets. J. Magn. Reson. ser. A. 101:1993;109-112.
66. Norwood T. J., Jones K. Relaxation effects and the measurement of scalr coupling constants using the E.COSY experiment. J. Magn. Reson. ser. A. 104:1993;106-110.
67. Olejniczak E. T., Dobson C. M., Karplus M., Levy R. M. Motional averaging of proton nuclear Overhauser effects in proteins. Predictions from a molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:1984;1923-1930.
68. 2ridges in 2D NMR spectra and procedures for suppression. J. Magn. Reson. 66:1986;187-193.
69. 1: structure, function and stability. Angew. Chem. 103:1991;351-468.
70. Pearlman D. A. How well do time-averaged J -coupling restraints work? J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994a;279-299.
71. Pearlman D. A. How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994b;1-16.
72. Pearlman D. A., Kollman P. A. Are time-averaged restraints necessary for nuclear magnetic resonance refinement? J. Mol. Biol. 220:1991;457-479.
73. 1: secondary structure and backbone dynamics as derived from chemical shifts. Quart. Magn. Res. Biol. Med. 3:1996;69-87.
74. Pople J. A., McIver J. W., Ostlund N. S. Self consistent pertubation theory. II. Nuclear spin coupling constants. J. Chem. Phys. 49:1968;2965-2970.
75. Porter R., O'Connor M., Whelan J. Editors of Mobility and Function in Porteins and Nucleic Acids. 1983;Pitman, London.
76. Post C. B., Meadows R. P., Gorenstein D. G. On the evaluation of interproton distances of three-dimensional structure determination by NMR using a relaxation matrix analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;6796-6803.
77. Press W. H., Flannery B. P., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T. Numerical Recipes. 1989;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
78. 1in Escherichia coli using a secretion cloning vector. Eur. J. Biochem. 173:1988;617-622.
79. Richardson J. S. The anatomy and taxonomy of proteins structure. Advan Protein Chem. 34:1981;167-339.
80. 1. nuclear magnetic resonance study of the active site. Eur. J. Biochem. 18:1971;313-318.
81. 1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 37:1969;247-253.
82. Saenger W. Structure and catalytic function of nucleases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1:1991;130-138.
83. Scheek R. M., Torda R. E., Kemmink J., van Gunsteren W. F. In Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by NMR. 1991;Plenum Press, New York.
84. Schmidt, J. M. 1990, Ermittlung der Tertiärstruktur von Proteinen mit 2D-NMR-Verfahren und Molekular-Dynamik-Rechnungen. PhD thesis, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
85. 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 197:1991;643-653.
86. Schmitz U., Kumar A., James T. L. Dynamic interpretation of NMR data: Molecular dynamics with weighted time-averaged restraints and ensemble R -factor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:1992;10654-10656.
87. 13C labeled proteins: a new method for the assignment of γ-methyl groups in valine residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:1993;7878-7879.
88. 1as studied by double and triple mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 229:1993;770-781.
89. 1acts as base catalyst when the true catalytic base, glutamatic acid-58, is replaced by alanine. Biochemistry. 29:1990;9064-9072.
90. 15NHSQC spectra of proteins. J. Magn. Reson. Series A. 107:1994;178-184.
91. Thomas P. D., Basus V., James T. L. Protein solution structure determination using distances from two dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect experiments: effect of approximations on the accuracy of derived structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA. 88:1991;1237-1241.
92. Torda A. E., Scheek R. M., van Gunsteren W. F. Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Phys. Letters. 157:1989;289-294.
93. Torda A. E., Scheek R. M., van Gunsteren W. F. Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. J. Mol. Biol. 214:1990;223-235.
94. Torda A. E., Brunne R. M., Huber T., Kessler H., van Gunsteren W. F. Structure refinement using time-averaged J -coupling restraints. J. Biomol. NMR. 3:1993;55-66.
95. van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. Groningen Molecular Simulation (GROMOS) Library Manual. 1987;Biomos, Groningen.
96. 13C decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 98:1992;428-435.
97. 15N enriched human ubiquitin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;1810-1813.
98. Wider G., Neri D., Otting G., Wüthrich K. A heteronuclear three-dimensional NMR experiment for measurement of small heteronuclear coupling constants in biological macromolecules. J. Magn. Reson. 85:1989;426-431.
99. Widmer H., Widmer A., Braun W. Extensive distance geometry calculations with different NOE calibrations: New criteria for structure selection applied to sandostatin and BPTI. J. Biomol. NMR. 3:1993;307-324.
100. 1H HMR and distance geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 182:1985;295-315.
101. Withka J. M., Srinivasan J., Bolton P. H. Problems with, and alternatives to, the NMR R factor. J. Magn. Reson. 98:1992;611-617.
102. Wüthrich K. In NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. 1986;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
103. Zhao D., Jardetzky O. An assessment of the precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by NMR. J. Mol. Biol. 239:1994;601-607.
104. 1with 3′-guanylic acid and guanosine. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;127-133.
105. Zuiderweg E. R. P., Mcintosh L. P., Dahlquist F. W., Fesik S. W. Three-dimensional carbon-13-resolved proton NOE spectroscopy of uniformly carbon-13-labeled proteins for the NMR assignment and structure determination of larger molecules. J. Magn. Reson. 86:1990;210.