Student nurse satisfaction: Implications for the common foundation programme

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 323-333

  Kinsella, Faye E ^a   Williams, W Robert ^a   Barbara, Green F ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; HUMANS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENT DROPOUTS; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 0033130053     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0644     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bentley H. The need for change in nurse education: a literature review. Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;131-136.
2. Braithwaite D N, Elzubeir M., Stark S. Project 2000 student wastage: a case study. Nurse Education Today. 14:1994;15-21.
3. Briggs A. Report of the Commitee on Nursing. 1972;HMSO, London.
4. Cohen A. Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: a meta analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education. 13:1980;321-341.
5. Cowman S. Student evaluation: a performance indicator of quality in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 24:1996;625-632.
6. Cuthbertson P. Attitudes to Project 2000: a survey of qualified nurses. Nursing Standard. 11:1996;38-41.
7. Dodds A E, Lawrence J A, Wearing A J. What makes nursing satisfying: a comparison of college students' and registered nurses' views. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 16:1991;741-753.
8. Heyman R., Shaw M P, Harding J. A longitudinal study of changing attitudes to work among nursing trainees in two British general hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 9:1984;297-305.
9. Hislop S., Inglis B., Cope P., Stoddart B., McIntosh C. Situating theory in practice: student views of theory-practice in Project 2000 nursing programmes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 23:1996;171-177.
10. Houltram B. Entry age, entry mode and academic performance on a Project 2000 common foundation programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 23:1996;1089-1097.
11. Jowett S., Walton I., Payne S. The introduction of Project 2000; Early perspectives from the students. 1992;NFER, Slough.
12. Jowett S. Added value. Nursing Times. 91:1995;55-57.
13. Jordan S., Reid K. The biological sciences in nursing: an empirical paper reporting on the applications of physiology to nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26:1997;169-179.
14. Leonard A., Jowett S. Charting the course. 1990;NFER, Slough.
15. Lowry M. Attrition, attrition - we all fall down. Professional Nurse. 7:1992;791-793.
16. MacGuire J. Research findings on recruitment and withdrawal. The implications for nurse training. Nursing Times. 65:1969;33-36.
17. MacLeod C lark J, Maben J., Jones K. Project 2000: Perceptions of the philosophy and practice of nursing: preparation for practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26:1997;246-256.
18. Millar J. Pioneers or guinea pigs. Nursing Times. 87:1991;26-28.
19. Murray M., Chambers M. Characteristics of students entering different forms of nurse training. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 15:1990;1099-1105.
20. Orr JG. Traditional V Project 2000 something old, something new. Nurse Education Today. 10:1990;58-62.
21. Parker T J, Carlisle C. Project 2000 students' perceptions of their training. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 24:1996;771-778.
22. Phillips T., Schostak J., Bedford H., Leamon J. Student finances and part time work - some implications for learning. The evaluation of pre-registration undergraduate degrees in nursing and midwifery programmes. 1996a;135-149.
23. Phillips T., Schostak J., Bedford H., Leamon J. Experiences of learning in higher education. The evaluation of pre-registration undergraduate degrees in nursing and midwifery programmes. 1996b;113-124.
24. Playle J F. Quality in nurse education: an exploration of the concept of students as customers. Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;213-220.
25. Pleasance P I, Sweeney J. Nursing for change: the orientation and values of Project 2000 diploma and undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 20:1994;1156-1161.
26. Rogers P., Lawton C. Self-assessment of Project 2000 supervision. Nursing Times. 91:1995;42-45.
27. Rolfe G. Listening to students: course evaluation as action research. Nurse Education Today. 14:1994;159-254.
28. Russell G C, Cordingley M. Using student, teacher and practice supervisor feedback to improve the quality of nurse education: how should we collect it and what should we do with it. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 24:1996;1042-1046.
29. Smithers K., Bircumshaw D. The student experience of undergraduate education: the relationship between academic and clinical learning environments. Nurse Education Today. 8:1988;347-353.
30. West M., Rushton R. The drop-out factor. Nursing Times. 82:1986;29-31.
31. White, J, Williams, W, R, Green, B, F. Discontinuation, leaving reasons and course evaluation comments of students on the common foundation programme, Nurse Education Today, in press.
32. Wood R. Working party on the recruitment and training of nurses. 1947;HMSO, London.