Using student, teacher and practice supervisor feedback to improve the quality of nurse education: How should we collect it and what should we do with it?

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1042-1046

  Russell, Graham C ^a   Cordingley, Maureen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FACULTY, NURSING; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING, SUPERVISORY; PILOT PROJECTS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 0030277129     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02941.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Abbot R.D., Hess C.W., Nyquist J.D., Ropp V.A. & Wulff. D.H. (1990) Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2), 201-206.
2. Abrami P.C., D'Apollonia S. & Cohen P.A. (1990) Validity of student ratings of instruction: what we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2), 219-231.
3. Allan P. & Jolley M. (1987) The Curriculum in Nurse Education. Groom Helm, London.
4. Anastasi A. (1990) Psychological Testing. Macmillan Publishing Co., NY.
5. Cohen A. (1980) Effectiveness of student - rating feedback for improving college instruction: a meta analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education 13, 321-341.
6. Kremer J.F. (1990) Construct validity of multiple measures in teaching, research and service and reliability of peer ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2), 213-218.
7. L'Hommedieu R., Brinko K.T. & Menges R.J. (1990) Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback from student ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2), 232-241.
8. Nightingale P. & O'Neil M. (1994) Achieving Quality Learning in Higher Education. Kogan Page, London.
9. O'Neil M. & Pennington G. (1992) Evaluating Teaching and Courses from an Active Learning Perspective. Module 12 of effective learning and teaching in higher education series. CVCP/Universities Staff Development and Teaching Unit, Sheffield.
10. Partington P., Day M., Jackson N., O'Neil M., Pennington G. & Wilson A. (1993) Student Feedback: Context, Issues and Practice. Committee of Vice-chancellors and Principals/ Universities' Staff Development Unit, Sheffield.