Confusion about mammography: Prevalence and consequences

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 509-520

  Rimer, Barbara K ^a   Halabi, Susan ^b   Strigo, Tara S ^c   Crawford, Yancey ^c   Lipkus, Isaac M ^c  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH CAROLINA; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 0033123265     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.509     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gordillo C. Breast cancer screening guidelines agreed on by AMA, other medically related organizations. JAMA 1989;262:1155.
2. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: International Medical Publishing, 1996.
3. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Nati Cancer Inst 1993;85:1644.
4. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-59. J Nati Cancer Inst 1997;80:1015.
5. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society statement on mammography guidelines. New York: American Cancer Society National Media Office, 1997.
6. Gail M, Rimer B. Risk-based recommendations for mammographie screening for women in their forties. J Clin Oncol 1998;6:3105.
7. Kopans DB. Updated results of the trials of screening mammography. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1977;6:233.
8. Woolf SH, Lawrence RS. Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: Lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. JAMA 1997;278:2105.
9. Sutton SM, Eisner EJ, Johnston CM. The mammography guideline controversy: Where does the consumer fit in? J Am Med Worn Assoc 1994;49:53.
10. Siegler IC, Feaganes JR, Rimer BK. Awareness of and responses to changes in the National Cancer Institute's guidelines for mammography in women aged 35-49. J Women's Health 1996;5:33.
11. Morton E, Tambor E, Rimer BK, Tessaro I, Farrell D, Siegler IC. Impact of National Cancer Institute's revised mammography screening guidelines on women 40-49. Women's Health Issues 1996;6:246.
12. Taplin SH, Urban N, Taylor VM, Savarino J. Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: Does the physician's recommendation matter? J Am Board Fam Pract 1997;10:88.
13. Slanetz PJ, Moore RH, Hulka CA, et al. Screening mammography: Effect of national guidelines on current physician practice. Radiology 1997;203:335.
14. Klabunde CN, O'Malley MS, Kaluzny AD. Physicians' reactions to change in recommendations for mammography Screening. Am J Prev Med 1997;13:432.
15. Reifel J, Bastani R, Ganz PA. Controversy about mammography screening guidelines and physician practices at a university medical center. J Cancer Educ 1998;13:145.
16. Aiken LS, Jackson KM, Lapin A. Mammography screening for women under 50: Women's response to medical controversy and changing practice guidelines. Women Health 1998;4:169.
17. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP. Women's decision making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 1993;12:209.
18. Stoddard AM, Rimer BK, Lane D, et al., for the NCI Breast Cancer Consortium. Underusers of mammogram screening: Stage of adoption in five subpopulations. Prev Med 1998;27:478.
19. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein MG, et al. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med 1998;27:748.
20. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DI. Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:77.
21. McBride CM, Curry SJ, Taplin S, Anderman C, Grothaus L. Exploring environmental barriers to participation in mammography screening in an HMO. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1993;2:599.