Risk-based recommendations for mammographic screening for women in their forties

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 3105-3114

  Gail, M ^a   Rimer, B ^b  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENARCHE; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031697591     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.3105     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Taubes G: The breast-screening brawl. Science 275:1056-1059, 1997
2. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, et al: Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1644-1656, 1993
3. American Cancer Society: Report of the Workshop on Guidelines for Breast Cancer Detection. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, March 1997
4. National Cancer Advisory Board Recommendations for Women Aged 40-49. Rockville, MD, National Cancer Institute, March 1997
5. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49. Bethesda, MD, January 21-23, 1997
6. US Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Screening for Breast Cancer (ed 2). Philadelphia, PA, Williams & Wilkins, 1996, pp 73-87
7. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Smart CA: Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: A new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Presented at the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Mammography, Bethesda, MD, January 21-23, 1997
8. Berry DG: Benefits and risks of screening mammography between ages 40 and 49. Presented to the National Cancer Advisory Board, Rockville, MD, February 27, 1997
9. Harris R, Leininger L: Clinical strategies for breast cancer screening: Weighing and using the evidence. Ann Intern Med 122:539-547, 1995
10. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al: Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. JAMA 276:39-43, 1996
11. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al: Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089-1096, 1998
12. Byrne C, Smart CR, Chu KC, et al: Survival advantage differences by age: Evaluation of the extended follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project. Cancer 74:301-310, 1994
13. Kerlikowske K, Barclay J, Grady D, et al: Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:77-82, 1997
14. Silverman MJ: Noninvasive breast cancer: The dilemma of the 1990s. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 21:639-658, 1994
15. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879-1886, 1989
16. de Boor C: A Practical Guide to Splines. New York, NY, Springer-Verlag, 1978
17. Wingo PA, Ory HW, Layde PM, et al and the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group: The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design. Am J Epidemiol 128:206-217, 1988
18. Cancer Letter (vol 23; no. 12), Washington, DC, Cancer Letter, Inc, March 28, 1997, pp 2-5
19. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research: AHCPR releases evidence report on colorectal cancer screening, Rockville, MD, 1997
20. Black WC, Nease FR Jr, Tosteson ANA: Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:720-731, 1995
21. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Strigo TS: Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5:1005-1011, 1996
22. Gail MH, Benichou J: Assessing the risk of breast cancer in individuals, in DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg, SA (eds): Cancer Prevention. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, 1992, pp 1-15
23. Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, et al (eds): SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1991: Tables and Graphs. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health. Publication no. 94-2789, 1994
24. Kelsey JL: A review of the epidemiology of breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1:74-109, 1979
25. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD: Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Cancer 73:643-651, 1994
26. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al: The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 336:1401-1408, 1997
27. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al: Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622-1629, 1995
28. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670-675, 1995
29. Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, et al: Effect of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:286-292, 1995
30. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, et al: Efficacy of screening mammography: A meta-analysis. JAMA 273:149-154, 1995
31. Day NE, Walter SD, Tabar L, et al: The sensitivity and lead time of breast cancer screening: A comparison of results of different studies, in Day NE, Miller AB (eds): Screening for Breast Cancer. Toronto, Canada, Hans Huber, 1988, pp 105-109
32. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al: Effect of age, breast density and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33-38, 1996