Effects of salicylates on evoked otoacoustic emissions and remote masking in humans

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 174-179

  Quaranta, Antonio ^a   Portalatini, Paola ^a   Camporeale, Michele ^b   Sallustio, Vincenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Evoked otoacoustic emissions; Ototoxicity; Remote masking; Salicylate

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID;

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BASILAR MEMBRANE; CILIARY MOTILITY; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; ADULT; ASPIRIN; BASILAR MEMBRANE; BIOMECHANICS; CYCLOOXYGENASE INHIBITORS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033034558     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073019     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Myers E N, Bernstein J M. Salicylate ototoxicity. Arch Otolaryngol 1965; 82: 483–93
2. McCabe P A, Dey D. The effect of aspirin upon auditory sensitivity. Ann Otol 1965; 74: 312–25
3. Pederson C P. Brief tone audiometry in persons treated with salicylate. Audiology 1974; 13: 311–19
4. McFadden D, Plattsmier H S, Pasanen E G. Aspirin induced hearing loss as a model of sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 1984; 16: 251–60
5. Bonding P. Critical bandwidth in patients with a hearing loss induced by salicylates. Audiology 1979; 18: 133–44
6. Evans E F, Wilson J P, Borerwe T A. CIBA Foundation Symposium No 85. Animal models of tinnitus. Pitman, London 1981; 108–29
7. Boettcher F A, Bancroft B R, Salvi R J, et al. Effects of sodium salicylate on evoked-response measures of hearing in the chinchilla. Hear Res 1989; 42: 129–42
8. Brien J A. Ototoxicity associated with salicylates. A brief review. Drug Safety 1993; 9: 143–8
9. Chiodo A A, Alberti P W. Experimental, clinical and preventive aspects of ototoxicity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 251: 375–92
10. Bernstein J M, Weiss A D. Further observations on salicylate ototoxicity. J Laryngol Otol 1967; 89: 915–25
11. De Moura L F, Hayden R C. Salicylate ototoxicity. Arch Otolaryngol 1968; 87: 60–4
12. Douek E, Dodson H, Bannister L. The effects of sodium salicylate on the cochlea of the guinea pig. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 93: 793–9
13. Myers E N, Bernstein J M. Salicylate ototoxicity. Arch Otolaryngol 1965; 82: 483–93
14. Garentz S L, Schacht J. Ototoxicity: of mice and men. Clinical Aspects of Hearing, D, Van, R, Water, A N, Popper, R R, Fay. Springer, New York 1996; 116–54
15. Gold A, Wilpizeski C R. Studies in auditory adaptation. The effects of sodium salicylateon evoked auditory potentials in cats. Laryngoscope 1966; 76: 674–85
16. Silverstein H, Bernstein J M, Davies D G. Salicylate ototoxicity: a biochemical and electrophysiological study. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 118–28
17. Mitchell D, Brumme H R, Himes D, et al. Electrophysiological study of the effect of sodium salicylae on the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; 98: 297–301
18. Hallworth R. Modulation of outer hair cell compliance and force by agents that affect hearing. Hear Res 1997; 114: 204–12
19. Kakehata S, Santos-Sacchi J. Effect of salicylate and lanthanides on outer hair cell motility and associated gating charge. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4881–9
20. Jung T TK, Rhee C, Lee C S, Park Y, Choi D. Ototoxicity of salicylate, non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and quinine. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 1993; 26: 791–810
21. Ashmore J F. Effect of salicylate on a rapid charge movement in outer hair cells isolated from the ginea-pig cochlea. J Physiol 1990; 412: 46P
22. Shehata W E, Brownell W E, Dieler R. Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 707–18
23. Ashmore J F, Mammano F, Gale J E, Tunstall M J. The pharmacology of the outer cell hair cell motor. Active Hearing, A, Flock, D, Ottoson, M, Ulfendahl. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 1995; 337–48
24. Zheng J L, Gao W Q. Differential damage to auditory neurons and hair cells by ototoxins and neuroprotection by specific neurotrophins in rat cochlear organotypic cultures. Eur J Neurosci 1996; 8: 1897–905
25. Kenmochi K, Eggermont J J. Salycilate and quinine affect the central nervous system. Hear Res 1997; 113: 110–16
26. Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92
27. Karlovisch R S, Osier H A. Remote masking generated by high-frequency two tone complexes. Audiology 1977; 16: 507–21
28. Bilger R C, Hirch I J. Masking of tones by bands of noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1956; 28: 623–30
29. Henry K R, Ayars N M, Paolinelli M C, Nguyen H H. Extra-high-frequency noise remotely masks and alters temporal integration at lower frequencies. Audiology 1985; 24: 309–18
30. Wegel R L, Lane C E. The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to dynamics of the inner ear. Physiol Rev 1924; 23: 266–85
31. Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12: 47–65
32. Deatherage B H, Davis H, Eldredge D H. Physiological evidence of the masking of low frequencies by high. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 132–7
33. Johnsen N J, Elberling C. Evoked otoacoustic emissions from the human ear. I. Equipment and response parameters. Scand Audiol 1986; 11: 3–12
34. Long G R, Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1343–53
35. Douek E E, Dodson H C, Bannister L H. The effects of sodium salicylate on the cochlea of guinea pig. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 93: 793–9
36. Brownell W E, Winston J B. Slow electrically evoked volume changes in guinea pig outer hair cells. 1989, Abstracts of Twelfth Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 138
37. Keith R W, Anderson C V. Remote masking for listeners with cochlear impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 1969; 46: 393–8
38. McFadden S L, Henderson D, Quaranta A. Remote masking in normal hearing and noise-exposed chinchilla. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 128–38
39. Rhode W S, Robles L. Evidence from Mossbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 588–96
40. Khanna S M, Ulfendahl M, Flock A. Cellular mechanical responses in the cochlea. Adv Audiol 1990; 7: 13–26
41. Ulfendahl M, Flock A, Khanna S M. Cochlear micromechanics. From isolated cells to the intacts hearing organ. Adv Audiol 1990; 7: 27–34
42. Ashmore J F. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J Physiol 1987; 388: 323–47
43. Brownell W E, Bader C R, Bertrand D, de Ripaubierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear hair cells. Science 1985; 227: 194–6
44. Dallos P, Evans B N, Hallworth R. Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 1991; 350: 155–7
45. Ruggero M. Response to sounds of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1992; 2: 449–56
46. Mammano F, Ashmore J F. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry. Nature 1993; 365: 838–41
47. Preyer S, Gummer A W. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1: 3–11
48. Quaranta A, McFadden S L, Henderson D, Sallustio V. Remote masking in noise-exposed chinchillas. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 226–8
49. Quaranta A, Salonna I. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and cochlear psychoacoustic test: effect of atropine. Adv Audiol 1990; 7: 171–9