Remote masking in normal-hearing and noise-exposed chinchillas;

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 128-138

  Mc Fadden, Sandra L ^a   Henderson, Donald ^a   Quaranta, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Acoustic trauma; Auditory masking; Auditory non linearity; Cochlear distortion; Noise induced hearing loss; Temporary threshold shift

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; CHINCHILLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING LOSS; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND PRESSURE;

EID: 0030936752     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000259236     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fay RR: Comparative psychoacoustics. Hear Res 1988:34.295-306.
2. I leffner RS. Heffner HE: Behavioral hearing range of the chinchilla. Hear Res 1991:52:13-16.
3. Giraudi D. Salvi R. Henderson D. Hamernik R: Gap detection by the chinchilla. J Acousl Soc Am 1980; 68:802-806.
4. Long G. Clark W: Detection of frequency and rate modulation by the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1984: 75:1184-1190.
5. McGee T, Ryan A, Dallos P: Psychophysical tuning curves of chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1976:60: 1146-1150.
6. Miller JD: Audibility curve of the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1970: 48:513-523.
7. Saunders SS, Shivapuja BG, Salvi RI,: Auditory intensity discrimination in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1987:82:1604-1607.
8. Henderson D. Salvi RJ. Boettcher FA. Clock AE: Neurophysiologic correlates of scnsori-ncural hearing loss; in Katz J (ed): Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins. 1994.
9. Ccrvcllera G. Quaranta A. Cassano P: Le remote masking: un test de conduction cochlcaire. Audiology 1978:17:317-323.
10. Ccrvcllera G, Quaranta A, Amoroso C: Clinical experience with remote masking. Audiology 1980; 19:404-410.
11. Keith RW. Anderson CV: Remote masking for listeners with cochlear impairment. J Acoust Soc Ant 1969: 46:393-398.
12. Quaranta A, Amoroso C, Ccrvcllera G: Remote masking in presbycusis. JAud Res 1978:18:125-129.
13. Quaranta A. Salonna I. Lottgo G: Remote masking, brief tone audiometry and critical ratio in sensorineural hearing losses. Scand Audio! Suppl 1986;25:153-158.
14. Quaranta A, Salonna I, Beltomo F: Psychoacoiislical performance in children. Scand Audiol 1992:21: 265-267.
15. Bilger RC: Intensive determinants of remote masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1958:30:817-824.
16. Bilger RC: Remote masking in the absence of inlra-aural muscles. J Acoust Soc Am 1966:39:103-108.
17. Bilger RC. Hirsh IJ: Masking of tones by bands of noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1956:28:623-630.
18. Dcathcrage BII, Davis H, Eldrcdgc DH: Physiological evidence of the masking of low frequencies by high. Acoust Soc Am 1957:29:132-137.
19. Karlovich RS. Osier HA: Remote masking generated by high-frequency two-tone complexes. Audiology 1977:16:507-521.
20. Henry KR. Avars NM. Paolinelli MC. Nguyen HH: Extra-high-frequency noise remotely masks and alters temporal integration at lower frequencies. Audiology 1985:24: 309-318.
21. Hirsh IF. Burgeat M: Binaural effects in remote masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1958:30:827-833.
22. Wegel RL. lane CE: The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Physiol Rev 1924:23:266-285.
23. Fletcher II: Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12:47-65.
24. Hawkins JE, Stevens SS: The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1950: 22:6-13.
25. Ccrvcllera G, Quaranta A: Audiologic findings in presbycusis. J And Res 1982:22:161-171.
26. Quaranta A, Salonna I, Longo G: Subclinieal changes of auditory function in the aged. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh suppl) 1991:476:91-96.
27. Evans EF. Elbcrling C: Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential. Audiology 1982;21:204-230.
28. Robertson LF. Salvi RJ. Poon M. Powers NL: Evoked potential tone-on-tone masking patterns in the chinchilla. Am J Otol 1990:11:431-436.
29. Henderson D. Ilamernik HP. Woodford C. Sitler RW. Salvi RJ: Evoked-response audibility curve ot' the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1973:54:1099-1101.
30. Murphy WJ, Themann CL: Hearing thresholds from auditory evoked potentials: Subcutaneous and implanted electrodes. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1995:548:137.
31. McFadden SL. Henderson D. Shen Y-H: Low-frequency conditioning exposures provide long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas. Hear Res 1997: 103:142-150.
32. Clark WW. Bohne BA: Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol suppl 1978: 51:1-16.
33. Clark WW, Clark CS, Moody DB, Stcbbins WC: Noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla, as determined by a positive-reinforcement technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56:1202-1209.
34. Subramaniam M. Henderson D. Spongr V: The relationship among distortion-product otoacoust.c emissions. evoked potential thresholds, and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Ear Hear 1994;15:299-309.
35. Subramaniam M, Salvi RJ, Spongr VP, Henderson D, Powers NL: Changes in distortion product oto-acoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear Res 1994:74:204-216.
36. Ward WI: Studies on the aural reflex. I. Contralateral remote masking as an indicator of reflex activity. J Acoust Soc Am 1961:33:1034-1045.
37. Trees DE. Turner CW: Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. Audiology 1986:25:70-83.
38. Smoorcnburg GF: Effects of temporary threshold shift on combination-tone generation and on two-tone suppression. Hear Res 1980:2:347-355.
39. Quaranta A. Salonna I: Evoked otoacoustic emissions and cochlear psychoacoustic tests: Effects of atropine; in Grandori F. Cianfronc G. Kemp DT (eds): Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emissions. Adv Audiol. Basel, Karger. 1990. vol 7, pp 171-179.
40. Crandell CC: Individual differences in speech recognition ability: Implications for hearing aid selection. Ear Hear (suppl) 1991:12:100-108.