Reading errors following right hemisphere injection of sodium amobarbital

Brain and Language

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 70-91

  Schwartz, Theodore H ^a   Ojemann, George A ^b   Dodrill, Carl B ^b  

^a New York Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOBARBITAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; COMPLEX PARTIAL SEIZURE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DYSLEXIA; ERROR; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INTRAARTERIAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; READING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0031172404     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1787     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahern G. L., Schomer D. L., Kleefield J., Blume H., Cosgrove G. R., Weintraub S., Mesulam M. M. Right hemisphere advantage for evaluating emotional facial expressions. Cortex. 27:1991;193-202.
2. Barbut D., Gazzaniga M. S. Disturbances in conceptual space involving language and speech. Brain. 110:1987;1487-1496.
3. Baynes K. Language and reading in the right hemisphere: Highways or byways of the brain? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2:1990;159-179.
4. Baxter D. M., Warrington E. K. Neglect dysgraphia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 46:1983;1073-1078.
5. Behrmann M., Moscovitch M., Black S. E., Mozer M. Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Brain. 113:1990;1163-1183.
6. Blume W. T., Grabow J. D., Darley F. L., Aronson A. E. Intracarotid amobarbital test of language and memory before temporal lobectomy for seizure control. Neurology. 23:1973;812-819.
7. Branch C., Milner B., Rasmussen T. Intracarotid sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech sominance: observations on 123 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 21:1964;399-405.
8. Brownell H. H., Simpson T. L., Bihrle A. M., Potter H. H., Gardner H. Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia. 28:1990;375-383.
9. Caplan B. Assessment of unilateral neglect: A new reading test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 9:1987;359-364.
10. Caplan D. Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology. 1987;Cambridge UniversityCambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication.
11. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature. 346:1990;267-269.
12. Coltheart M., Patterson K. E., Marshall J. C. Deep dyslexia. 1980;Routledge, London.
13. Costello A. dL., Warrington E. K. The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 50:1987;1110-1116.
14. Damasio A. R. Disorders of complex visual processing: agnosias, achromatopsia, Balint's syndrome, and related difficulties of orientation and construction. Principles of behavioral neurology. 1985;F.A. Davis, Philadelphia. p. 259-288.
15. Dodrill C. B. Preoperative criteria for identifying eloquent brain. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 4:1993;211-216.
16. Ellis A. W., Flude B. M., Young A. W. "Neglect dyslexia" and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 4:1987;439-464.
17. Fliess J. L. Statistical method for rates and proportions. 1981;Wiley, New York. p. 266-287.
18. Gazzaniga M. S., Nass R. D. Cerebral lateralization and specialization in human central nervous system. Geiger S. R., Plum F., Mountcastle V. B. Handbook of physiology, Section 1. 1987;701-761 American Physiological Society, Bethesda.
19. Hart J., Lesser R. P., Fisher R. S., Schwerdt P., Bryan R. N., Gordon B. Dominant-side intracarotid amobarbital spares comprehension of word meaning. Archives of Neurology. 48:1991;55-58.
20. Heilman K. M., Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetris of inattention (neglect). Neurology. 30:1980;327-330.
21. Heilman K. M., Watson R. T., Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. Heilman K. M., Valenstein E. Clinical neuropsychology. 1993;279-372 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
22. Holtzman J. D. Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: evidence from human commissurotomy patients. Vision Research. 24:1984;801-813.
23. Huh K., Meador K. J., Loring D. W., Lee G. P., Brooks B. S. Attentional mechanisms during the intracarotid amobarbital test. Neurology. 39:1989;1183-1186.
24. Hutner N., Liederman J. Right hemisphere participation in reading. Brain and Language. 41:1991;475-495.
25. Kaplan J. A., Brownell H. H., Jacobs J. R., Gardner H. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language. 38:1990;315-333.
26. Joanette Y., Goulet P., Hannequin D. Right hemisphere and verbal communication. 1990;Springer-Verlag, New York.
27. Katz R., Sevushi S. Positional dyslexia. Brain and Language. 37:1989;266-289.
28. Kinsbourne M., Warrington E. K. A variety of reading disability associated with right lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 25:1962;339-344.
29. Kurthen M., Linke D. B., Elger C. E., Schramm J. Linguistic perseveration in dominant-side intracarotid amobarbital tests. Cortex. 28:1992;209-219.
30. Landis T., Regard M. Relative interactive hemispheric dominance in reading. Euler C. V., Lundber I., Lennerstrand G. Brain and reading. 1988;99-113 Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series, Stockton Press.
31. Landis T., Graves R., Goodglass H. Aphasic reading and writing: possible evidence for right hemisphere participation. Cortex. 18:1982;105-112.
32. Lesser R. P., Dinner D. S., Lueders H., Morris H. H. Memory for objects presented soon after intracarotid amobarbital sodium injections in patients with medically intractable complex partial seizures. Neurology. 36:1986;895-899.
33. Luck S. J., Hillyard S. A., Mangun G. R., Gazzaniga M. S. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature. 342:1989;543-545.
34. Mateer C. A., Dodrill C. B. Neuropsychological and linguistic correlates of atypical language lateralization: Evidence from sodium amytal studies. Human Neurobiology. 2:1983;135-142.
35. McClelland J. L., Rumelhart D. E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 88:1981;375-407.
36. Meador K. J., Loring D. W., Lee G. P., Brooks B. S., Nichols F. T., Thompson E. E., Thompson W. O., Heilman K. M. Hemisphere asymmetry for eye gaze mechanisms. Brain. 112:1989;103-111.
37. Mesulam M. M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology. 10:1981;309-325.
38. Mesulam M. M. Attention, confusional states and neglect. Mesulam M. M. Principles of behavioral neurology. 1985;125-168 F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.
39. Moscovitch M. On representation of language in the right hemisphere of right-handed people. Brain and Language. 3:1976;47-71.
40. Payne M., Cooper W. E. Paralexic errors in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 23:1985;571-574.
41. Plourde G., Sperry R. W. Left hemisphere involvement in left spatial neglect from right-sided lesions. a commissurotomy study. Brain. 107:1984;95-106.
42. Poizner H., Kaplan E., Bellugi U., Padden C. A. Visual-spatial processing in deaf brain-damaged signers. Brain & Cognition. 3:1984;281-306.
43. Rausch R., Fedio P., Catherine M. A., Engel J. Jr., Crandall P. H. Resumption of behavior following intracarotid sodium amobarbital injection. Annals of Neurology. 15:1984;31-35.
44. Rasmussen T., Milner B. The role of early left brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech function. New York Academy of Sciences. 299:1977;355-369.
45. Regard M., Landis T., Wieser H. G., Hailemariam S. Functional inhibition and release: unilateral tachistoscopic performance and stereoelectroencephalographic activity in a case with left limbic status epilepticus. Neuropsychologia. 23:1985;575-581.
46. Ross E. D., Edmondson J. A., Seibert G. B., Homan W. Acoustic analysis of affective prosody during right sided Wada test: A within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere's role in language. Brain and Language. 33:1988;128-145.
47. Shallice T., Warrington E. K. The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 15:1977;31-41.
48. Scheibel A., Conrad T., Perdue S., Tomiyasu U., Wechsler A. A quantitative study of dendrite complexity in selected areas of the human cerebral cortex. Brain and Cognition. 12:1990;85-101.
49. Sieroff E., Pollatsek A., Posner M. I. Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the visual spatial attention system. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 5:1988;451-472.
50. Spiers P. A., Schomer D. L., Blume H. W., Kleefield J., O'Reilly G., Weintraub S., Osborne-Shaefer P., Mesulam M-M. Visual neglect during intracarotid amobarbital testing. Neurology. 40:1990;1600-1606.
51. Wada J. A new method for the determination of the side of cerebral speech dominance: A preliminary report on the intracarotid injection of sodium amytal in man. Medicine and Biology. 14:1949;221-222.
52. Wada J., Rasmussen T. Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Journal of Neurosurgery. 17:1960;266-282.
53. Woods R. P., Dodrill C. B., Ojemann G. A. Brain injury, handedness, and speech lateralization in a series of amobarbital studies. Annals of Neurology. 23:1988;510-518.
54. Zaidel E. Reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: an aphasiological perspective. Zotterman Y. Dyslexia; Neuronal, cognitive and linguistic aspects. 1982;67-91 Pergamon Press, Oxford.
55. Zihl J. Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia. Brain. 118:1995;891-912.