Test of mathematical assumptions behind the 'incidence function' estimation process of metapopulations' dynamic parameters

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 159, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 21-32

  Gosselin, Frédéric ^a,b  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b Cemagref   (France)

Author keywords

Conservation biology; Extinction; Incidence function; Metapopulation model; Spatially explicit

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL METHOD; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MODEL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; STEADY STATE;

EID: 0033005044     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00018-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. I. Hanski, A practical model of metapopulation dynamics, J. Animal Ecol. 63 (1994) 151.
2. I. Hanski, Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes, Trends Eco. Evo. 9 (1994) 131.
3. M. Gyllenberg, D.S. Silvestrov, Quasi-stationary distributions of a stochastic metapopulation model, J. Mathemat. Biol. 33 (1994) 35.
4. J.R. Day, H.P. Possingham, A stochastic metapopulation model with variability in patch size and position, Theo. Population Bio. 48 (1995) 333.
5. J. Verboom, K. Lankester, J.A.J. Metz, Linking local and regional dynamics in stochastic metapopulation models, Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42 (1991) 39.
6. I. Hanski, T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, G. Lei, Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape, Oikos 72 (1995) 21.
7. I. Hanski, J. Pöyry, T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics, Nature 377 (1995) 618.
8. I. Hanski, A. Moilanen, T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation, Conserv. Biol. 10 (1996) 578.
9. N. Wahlberg, A. Moilanen, I. Hanski, Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes, Science 273 (1996) 1536.
10. J.G. Kemeny, J.L. Snell, Finite Markov chains, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1960.
11. J.N. Darroch, E. Seneta, On quasi-stationary distributions in absorbing discrete finite Markov chains, J. Appl. Prob. 2 (1965) 88.
12. F. Gosselin, Reconciling theoretical approaches to stochastic patch-occupancy metapopulation models, Bull. Mathemat. Biol. 60 (1998) 955.
13. I. Hanski, Metapopulation ecology, in: O.E.J. Rhodes, R.K. Chesser, M.H. Smith, (Eds.), Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1996, p. 13.
14. I. Hanski, Inferences from ecological incidence functions, Am. Natural. 139 (1992) 657.
15. C.W. Clark, M.L. Rosenzweig, Extinction and colonization processes: parameter estimates from sporadic surveys, Am. Natural. 143 (1994) 583.
16. J. Verboom, C.J.F. ter Braak, On deducing time parameters from spatial patterns: a critique on Hanki's Practical metapopulation model in: J. Verboom, (Ed.), Modelling Fragmented Populations: Between Theory and Application in Landscape Planning, DLO Institute for Forestry and Nature Research (IBN-DLO), Wageningen, Netherlands, 1996, p. 93.
17. N.J. Ouborg, Isolation, population size and extinction: the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine-system, Oikos 66 (1993) 298.
18. P. Opdam, R. Foppen, R. Reijnen, A. Schotman, The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: Integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning, Ibis 137 (1994) S139.
19. C.D. Thomas, Difficulties in deducing dynamics from static distributions, Trends Eco. Evo. 9 (1994) 300.
20. P. Sjögren-Gulve, C. Ray, Using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics: large-scale forestry extirpates the pool frog in: D.R. McCullough, (Ed.), Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation, Island Press, Washington DC, 1996, p. 111.