The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 101-106

  Hindsén, Monica ^a   Bruze, Magnus ^a   Christensen, Ole B ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Immunological basis; Memory function; Nickel allergy; Re challenge; Test model; Topical

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; NICKEL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK; CHRONICITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNITY; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; PATCH TEST; PROVOCATION TEST; SKIN ALLERGY;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ECZEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY, DELAYED; IMMUNIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; NICKEL; PATCH TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030761956     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00312.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Svensson Å, Edman B, Møller H. A diagnostic tool for atopic dermatitis based on clinical criteria. Acta Dermatovenereologica 1985: 114: 33-40.
2. Bruze M. Seasonal influence on routine patch test results. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 184.
3. Allenby C F, Basketter D A. An arm immersion model of compromised skin.(II). Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concerations of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 129-133.
4. Hollander M, Wolfe D A. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1973.
5. Nielsen N H, Menné T. Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 16-21.
6. Christensen O B, Möller H. Nickel allergy and hand eczema. Contact Dermatitits 1975: 1: 129-135.
7. Werner-Linde I. Studies of the barrier in "dry" and clinically normal skin of patients with atopic dermatitis. Thesis 1989, Stockholm University.
8. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen O. Long-term individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. In manuscript.
9. Lindelöf B. Regional variations of patch test response to nickel-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 202.
10. Hindsén M, Christensen O B. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions following allergic and irritant inflammation. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1992: 72: 220-221.
11. Scheper R J, Von Blomberg M, Brynzeel D, Van Dier A. Induction of immunological memory in the skin. Role of local T-cell reaction. Clin Exp Immunol 1983: 51: 141-148.
12. Christensen O B, Möller H. External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 136-141.
13. Gawkrodger D J, Cook S W, Fell G S, Hunter J A A. Nickel dermatitis: the reaction to oral nickel challenge. Br J Dermatol 1986: 115: 33-38.
14. Jordan W R King S E. Nickel feeding in nickel-sensitive patients with hand eczema. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 506-508.
15. Christenen O B, Lindström C, Löfberg H, Möller H. Micromorphology and specificity of orally induced flare-up reactions in nickel-sensitive patients. Acta Dermatovenereologica 1981: 61: 505-510.
16. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen O B. Flare-up reactions after oral challenge with nickel, in relation to dose, intensity and time of previous patch test reactions. In manuscript.
17. Hindsén M, Christensen O B, Gruic V, Löfberg H. Fixed drug eruption: an immunohistochemical investigation of the acute and healing phase. Br J Dermatol 1987: 116: 351-360.
18. Porter D I, Comaish S. Fixed drug eruption: an autoradiographic study of exhange grafts. Br J Dermatol 1969: 81: 171-174.