Studies on the reproducibility of allergic contact dermatitis

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 208-214

  Memon, A A ^a   Friedmann, P S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NICKEL; NICKEL SULFATE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ALLERGY; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0030038154     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb07603.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fregert S. Manual of Contact Dermatitis, 2nd edn. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1981.
2. Friedmann PS. Contact hypersensitivity. Curr Opin Immunol 1989; 1: 690-3.
3. Jadassohn J. Zur Kenntnis der Medikamentosem Dermatosen. Fifth Congress of the German Academy of Dermatology, Graz, 1895; 103-29.
4. Adams R, Park M. Patch testing - a recapitulation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981; 5: 629-43.
5. Fischer TI, Maibach HI. Patch test allergens in petrolatum: a reappraisal. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11: 224-8.
6. Fischer T, Maibach H. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11: 285-7.
7. Lachapelle JM, Antoine JL. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 850-4.
8. Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J. Reproducibility of patch tests. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 1196-202.
9. Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J. Reproducibility of patch test results: Comparison of TRUE test and Finn chamber test results. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 843-6.
10. Fischer T, Rystedt I. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 12: 93-8.
11. Lachapelle JM. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 51-6.
12. International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG). Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1970; 50: 287-92.
13. Memon AA, Molokhia MM, Friedmann PS. The inhibitory effects of topical chelating agents and anti-oxidants on nickel-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 560-5.
14. Friedmann PS, Moss C, Shuster S, Simpson JM. Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 1983; 53: 709-15.
15. Eun HC, Marks R. Dose-response relationship for topically applied antigens. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122: 491-9.
16. Hjorth N. The development of the patch testing procedure and working for consistency. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 855-7.
17. Magnusson B, Hersle K. Patch test methods II. Regional variation of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1965; 45: 257-61.
18. van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa. Br J Dermatol 1989; 121: 709-12.
19. Lawrence CM, Howel D, Shuster S. Site variation in anthralin inflammation on forearm skin. Br J Dermatol 1986; 114: 609-13.
20. Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG. Angry back or the excited skin syndrome: a prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983; 8: 392-7.