Sonography of the Breast: Controversies and Opinions

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 169, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1635-1636

  Hall, Ferris M ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0031310573     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393181     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Hall FM. Screening mammography: potential problems on the horizon. N Engl J Med 1986;314:53-55
2. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1993:15
3. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179:463-468
4. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-124
5. Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? Radiology 1995;196:14-15
6. Expert Panel on Women's Imaging. Appropriateness criteria for imaging and treatment decisions. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1996
7. Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1489-1491
8. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995;76:626-630
9. Mammographic quality standards: proposed rules. Federal Register April 3, 1996;61:14856-14920