Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure recording by photoplethysmography in clinical studies using angiotensin challenges

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 586-593

  Buclin, T ^a   Buchwalder Csajka, C ^a   Brunner, H R ^a   Biollaz, J ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Angiotensin; Blood pressure; Pharmacometrics; Photoplethysmography

Indexed keywords

5 METHYL 7 PROPYL 8 [[2' (1H TETRAZOL 5 YL) 4 BIPHENYLYL]METHYL] 1,2,4 TRIAZOLO[1,5 C]PYRIMIDIN 2(3H) ONE; 7 (2 ACETYLTHIO 3 PHENYLPROPIONAMIDO) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,12B OCTAHYDRO 6 OXOPYRIDO[2,1 A][2]BENZAZEPINE 4 CARBOXYLIC ACID; ANGIOTENSIN; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; CANDESARTAN; CILEXADIL; FORASARTAN; LOSARTAN; LRB 081; N [[4' [(2 ETHYL 5,7 DIMETHYL 3H IMIDAZO[4,5 B]PYRIDIN 3 YL)METHYL] 2 BIPHENYLYL]SULFONYL]BENZAMIDE; OLMESARTAN; TAK 536; TASOSARTAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHOTOELECTRIC PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ANGIOTENSIN II; ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE I; COMPUTERS; DATA COLLECTION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; RECEPTORS, ANGIOTENSIN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032876622     PISSN: 03065251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00049.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Csajka C, Buclin T, Brunner HR, Biollaz J. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32: 1-29.
2. 2 Brunner HR, Waeber B, Nussberger J. Does pharmacological profiling of a new drug in normotensive volunteers provide a useful guideline to antihypertensive therapy? Hypertension 1983; 5: 101-107.
3. 3 Brunner RH, Christen Y, Munafo A, Lee RJ, Waeber B, Nussberger J. Clinical Experience with Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists. Am J Hypertension 1995; 5S: 243-246.
4. 4 Christen Y, Waeber B, Nussberger J, Brunner HR. Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring at the finger for studying short lasting pressor responses in man. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: 711-714.
5. 5 De Mey C, Schroeter V, Butzer R, Roll S, Belz GG. Method specificity of non-invasive blood pressure measurement: oscillometry and finger pulse pressure vs acoustic methods. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 40: 291-297.
6. 6 Kurki T, Smith NT, Head N, December-Silver H, Quinn A. Noninvasive continuous blood pressure measurement from the finger: otpimal measurement conditions and factors affecting reliability. J Clin Monit 1987; 3: 6-13.
7. 7 Jones RDM, Brown AG, Roulson CJ, Smith ID, Chan SC. The upgraded Finapres 2300e: a clinical evaluation of a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitor. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 701-705.
8. 8 Gabriel A, Lindblad LE, Angleryd C. Non-invasive vs invasive beat to-beat monitoring of blood pressure. Clin Physiol 1992; 12: 229-235.
9. 9 Buchwalder-Csajka C, Buclin T, Brunner HR, Biollaz J. Evaluation of the angiotensin challenge methodology for assessing the pharmacodynamic profile of antihypertensive drugs acting on the renin angiotensin system. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 594-604.
10. 10 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-310.
11. 11 Chinn S. The assessment of methods of measurement. Stat Med 1990; 9: 351-362.
12. 12 Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307-317.
13. 13 Parati G, Casadei R, Groppelli A, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring a rest and during laboratory testing. Hypertension 1989; 13: 647-655.
14. 14 Smith NT, Wesseling KH, de Wit B. Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger. J Clin Monit 1985; 1: 17-29.
15. 15 Bos WJB, van Goudoever J, van Montfrans GA, Van den Meiracker AH, Wesseling KH. Reconstruction of brachial artery pressure from noninvasive finger pressure measurements. Circulation 1996; 94: 1870-1875.
16. 16 Molhock GP, Wesseling KH, Settels JM, et al. Evaluation of the Penàz servo-plethysmo-manometer for the continuous, non-invasive measurement of finger blood pressure. Basic Res Cardiol 1984; 79: 598-609.
17. 17 Imholz BPM, Settels JJ, van der Meiracker AH, Wesseling KH, Wieling W. Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure. Cardiovasc Res 1990; 24: 214-221.
18. 18 Pace NL, East TD. Simultaneous comparison of intraarterial, oscillometric, and Finapres monitoring during anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 213-220.
19. 19 Rongen GA, Bos WJW, Lenders JWM, et al. Comparison of intrabrachial and finger blood pressure in healthy elderly volunteers. Am J Hypertens 1995; 8: 237-248.
20. 20 Stokes DN, Clutton-brock T, Patil C, Thompson JM, Hutton P. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurement of continuous arterial pressure using the finapres. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 26-35.
21. 21 Líndqvist A. Beat-to-beat agreement of non-invasive finger artery and invasive radial artery blood pressure in hypertensive patients taking cardiovascular medication. Clin Physiol 1995; 15: 219-229.
22. 22 Gibbs MN, Faracs BS, Larach DR, Derr JA. The accuracy of Finapres noninvasive mean arterial pressure measurements in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 647-652.
23. 23 Kermode JL, Davis NJ, Thompson WR. Comparison of the Finapres blood pressure monitor with intra-arterial manometry during induction of anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1989; 17: 470-486.
24. 24 Van Egmond J, Hasenbos M, Crul JF. Invasive vs non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 434-444.
25. 25 Aitken HA, Todd JG, Kenny GNC. Comparison of the Fianapres and direct arterial pressure monitoring during profound hypotensive anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 36-40.
26. 26 Jones RDM, Kornberg JP, Roulson CJ, Visram AR, Irwin MG. The Finapres 2300e finger cuff. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 611-615.
27. 27 Musso NR, Giacchè M, Galbariggi G, Vergassola C. Blood pressure evaluation by noninvasive and traditional methods. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 293-299.
28. 28 Weiss BM, Spahn DR, Rahmig H, Rohling R, Pasch T. Radial artery tonometry: moderately accurate but unpredictable technique of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 405-411.
29. 29 Cameron JD, McGrath BP, Dart AM. Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1214-1220.
30. 30 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. In A.A.M.I. Standards, Arlington 1980; 29-42.