Annealing in crystallography: A powerful optimization tool

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 135-155

  Brunger, Axel T ^a   Adams, Paul D ^a   Rice, Luke M ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GEOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DNA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032847732     PISSN: 00796107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6107(99)00004-8     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abagyan R., Argos P. Optimal protocol and trajectory visualization for conformational searches of peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 225:1992;519-532.
2. Abramowitz M., Stegun I. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Applied Mathematics Series. vol. 55:1968;896 Dover, New York.
3. Adams P.D., Pannu N.S., Read R.J., Brunger A.T. Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;5018-5023.
4. Adams P.D., Pannu N.S., Read R.J., Brunger A.T. Extending the limits of molecular replacement through combined simulated annealing and maximum likelihood refinement. Acta Cryst. D. 55:1999;181-190.
5. Allen F.H., Kennard O., Taylor R. Systematic analysis of structural data as a research technique in organic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 16:1983;146-153.
6. Bae D.-S., Haug E.J. A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics. I. Open loop systems. Mech. Struct. Mach. 15:1987;359-382.
7. Bae D.-S., Haug E.J. A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics. II. Open loop systems. Mech. Struct. Mach. 15:1988;481-506.
8. Berendsen H.J.C., Postma J.P.M., van Gunsteren W.F., DiNola A., Haak J.R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81:1984;3684-3690.
9. Bonvin A.M.J.J., Brunger A.T. Conformational variability of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures. J. Mol. Biol. 250:1995;80-93.
10. Bonvin A.M.J.J., Brunger A.T. Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures? J. Biomol. NMR. 7:1996;72-76.
11. Braun W. Distance geometry and related methods for protein structure determination from NMR data. Q. Rev. Biophys. 19:1987;115-157.
12. Braun W., Go N. Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance constraints. A new efficient algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 186:1985;611-626.
13. Bricogne G. A multisolution method of phase determination by combined maximization of entropy and likelihood. III. Extension to powder diffraction data. Acta Cryst. A. 47:1991;803-829.
14. Bricogne G. Direct phase determination by entropy maximization and likelihood ranking: status report and perspectives. Acta Cryst. D. 49:1993;37-60.
15. Bricogne G. Bayesian statistical viewpoint on structure determination: basic concepts and examples. Meth. Enzy. 276:1997;361-423.
16. Brunger A.T. Crystallographic refinement by simulated annealing: application to a 2.8 Å resolution structure of aspartate aminotransferase. J. Mol. Biol. 203:1988;803-816.
17. Brunger A.T. The free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. Nature. 355:1992;472-474.
18. Brunger A.T., Clore G.M., Gronenborn A.M., Karplus M. Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83:1986;3801-3805.
19. Brunger A.T., Kuriyan J., Karplus M. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science. 235:1987;458-460.
20. Brunger A.T., Karplus M., Petsko G.A. Crystallographic refinement by simulated annealing: application to a 1.5 Å resolution structure of crambin. Acta Cryst. A. 45:1989;50-61.
21. Brunger A.T., Krukowski A., Erickson J. Slow-cooling protocols for crystallographic refinement by simulated annealing. Acta Cryst. A. 46:1990;585-593.
22. Brunger A.T., Clore G.M., Gronenborn A.M., Saffrich R., Nilges M. Assessment of the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross-validation. Science. 261:1993;328-331.
23. Burling F.T., Brunger A.T. Thermal motion and conformational disorder in protein crystal structures: comparison of multi-conformer and time-averaging models. Israel J. Chem. 34:1994;165-175.
24. Burling F.T., Weis W.I., Flaherty K.M., Brunger A.T. Direct observation of protein solvation and discrete disorder with experimental crystallographic phases. Science. 271:1996;72-77.
25. Clore G.M., Nilges M., Sukumaran D.K., Brunger A.T., Karplus M., Gronenborn A.M. The three-dimensional structure of a-purothionin in solution: combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance, distance geometry and restrained molecular dynamics. EMBO J. 5:1986;2729-2735.
26. Clore G.M., Oschkinat H., McLaughlin L.W., Benseler F., Scalfi-Happ C., Happ E., Gronenborn A.M. Refinement of the solution structure of the DNA dodecamer 5′d(CGCGPATTCGCG)2 containing a stable purine-thymine base pair: combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance and restrained molecular dynamics. Biochemistry. 27:1988;4185-4197.
27. Curro J. Computer simulation of multiple chain systems - the effect of density on the average chain dimension. J. Chem. Phys. 61:1974;1203-1207.
28. Dauter Z., Lamzin V.S., Wilson K.S. Proteins at atomic resolution. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1995;784-790.
29. Diamond R. A real-space refinement procedure for proteins. Acta Cryst. A. 27:1971;436-452.
30. Engh R.A., Huber R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray structure refinement. Acta Cryst. A. 47:1991;392-400.
31. Fujinaga M., Gros P., van Gunsteren W.F. Testing the method of crystallographic refinement using molecular dynamics. J. Appl. Cryst. 22:1989;1-8.
32. Garrett D.S., Kuszewski J., Hancock T.J., Lodi P.J., Vuister G W., Gronenborn A.M., Clore G.M. The impact of direct refinement against three-bond HN-C alpha H coupling constants on protein structure determination by NMR. J. Magn. Res. B. 104:1994;99-103.
33. Goldstein H. Classical Mechanics. 2nd ed. 1980;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
34. Gros P., van Gunsteren W.F., Hol W.G.J. Inclusion of thermal motion in crystallographic structures by restrained molecular dynamics. Science. 249:1990;1149-1152.
35. Hendrickson W.A. Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures. Meth. Enzymol. 115:1985;252-270.
36. Hendrickson W.A. Determination of macromolecular structures from anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Science. 254:1991;51-58.
37. Hoppe W. Die Faltmolekülmethode - eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Kristallstruktur bei Ganz oder Teilweise bekannter Molekülstruktur. Acta Cryst. 10:1957;750-751.
38. Hsu I.N., Delbaere L.T.J., James M.N.G., Hoffman T. Penicillopepsin from Penicillium janthinellum crystal structure at 2.8 Å and sequence homology with porcine pepsin. Nature. 266:1977;140-145.
39. Jain A., Vaidehi N., Rodriguez G. A fast recursive algorithm for molecular dynamics simulation. J. Comp. Phys. 106:1983;258-268.
40. Jones T.A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Cryst. A. 47:1991;110-119.
41. Kaptein R., Zuiderweg E.R.P., Scheek R.M., Boelens R., van Gunsteren W.F. A protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance data. lac repressor headpiece. J. Mol. Biol. 182:1985;179-182.
42. Karplus M. Vicinal proton coupling in nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85:1963;2870-2871.
43. Karplus M., Petsko G.A. Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature. 347:1990;631-639.
44. Kim Y., Prestegard J.H. Refinement of the NMR structures for acyl carrier protein with scalar coupling data. Proteins Structure Function Genetics. 8:1990;377-385.
45. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D., Vecchi M.P. Jr. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 220:1983;671-680.
46. Kleywegt G.J., Brunger A.T. Cross-validation in crystallography: practice and applications. Structure. 4:1996;897-904.
47. Kuriyan J., Petsko G.A., Levy R.M., Karplus M. Effect of anisotropy and anharmonicity on protein crystallographic refinement. J. Mol. Biol. 190:1986;227-254.
48. Kuriyan J., Ösapay K., Burley S.K., Brunger A.T., Hendrickson W.A., Karplus M. Exploration of disorder in protein structures by X-ray restrained molecular dynamics. Proteins. 10:1991;340-358.
49. Kuszewski J., Gronenborn A.M., Clore G.M. The impact of direct refinement against proton chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J. Magn. Res. B. 107:1995;293-297.
50. Kuszewski J., Qin J., Gronenborn A.M., Clore G.M. The impact of direct refinement against 13C alpha and 13C beta chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J. Magn. Res. B. 106:1995;92-96.
51. Kuszewski J., Gronenborn A.M., Clore G.M. Improving the quality of NMR and crystallographic structures by means of a conformational potential derived from structure databases. Prot. Sci. 5:1996;1067-1080.
52. Laarhoven, P.J.M., Aarts, E.H.L. (Eds.), 1987. Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 187.
53. Lamzin V.S., Wilson K.S. Automated refinement of protein models. Acta Cryst. D. 49:1993;129-147.
54. Li Z., Scheraga H.A. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;6611-6615.
55. Mathiowetz A.M., Jain A., Karasawa N., Goddard W.A. Protein simulations using techniques suitable for very large systems: the cell multipole method for nonbond interactions and the Newton-Euler inverse mass operator method for internal coordinate dynamics. Proteins Structure Function Genetics. 20:1994;227-247.
56. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth M., Rosenbluth A., Teller A., Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1953;1087-1092.
57. Mierke D.F., Huber T., Kessler H.J. Coupling constants again: experimental restraints in structure refinement. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 8:1994;29-40.
58. Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A., Dodson E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Cryst. D. 53:1997;240-255.
59. Newman M., Watson F., Roychowdhury P., Jones H., Badasso M., Cleasby A., Wood S.P., Tickle I.J., Blundell T.L. X-ray analyses of aspartic proteinases. V. Structure and refinement at 2.0 Å resolution of the aspartic proteinase from Mucor pusillus. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1993;260-283.
60. Nilges M. Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulfide connectivities. J. Mol. Biol. 245:1995;645-660.
61. Nilges M. Structure calculation from NMR data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;617-623.
62. Nilges M., Clore G.M., Gronenborn A.M. Determination of three dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms. FEBS Lett. 239:1988;129-136.
63. Nilges M., Clore G.M., Gronenborn A.M. Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing calculations. FEBS Lett. 229:1988;317-324.
64. Nilges M., Gronenborn A.M., Brunger A.T., Clore G.M. Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins by simulated annealing with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin, potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor and barley serine proteinase inhibitor 2. Protein Eng. 2:1988;27-38.
65. Nilges M., Kuszewski J., Brunger A.T. Hoch J.C., Poulsen F.M., Redfield C. Sampling Properties of Simulated Annealing and Distance Geometry. Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 1991;451-455 Plenum Press, New York.
66. Oldfield E. Chemical shifts and three-dimensional protein structures. J. Biomol. NMR. 5:1995;217-225.
67. Pannu N.S., Read R.J. Improved structure refinement through maximum likelihood. Acta Cryst. A. 52:1996;659-668.
68. Pannu N.S., Murshudov G.N., Dodson E.J., Read R.J. Incorporation of prior phase information strengthens maximum likelihood structural refinement. Acta Cryst. D. 54:1998;1285-1294.
69. Parkinson G., Vojtechovsky J., Clowney L., Brunger A.T., Berman H.M. New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid containing structures. Acta Cryst. D. 52:1996;57-64.
70. Pearlman D.A., Kim S.-H. Atomic charges for DNA constituents derived from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. J. Mol. Biol. 211:1990;171-187.
71. Perrakis A., Sixma T.K., Wilson K.S., Lamzin V.S. wARP: improvement and extension of crystallographic phases by weighted averaging of multiple-refined dummy atomic models. Acta Cryst. D. 53:1997;448-455.
72. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolosky S.A., Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes. 1986;498-546 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
73. Read R.J. Improved Fourier coefficients for maps using phases from partial structures with errors. Acta Cryst. A. 42:1986;140-149.
74. Read R.J. Structure-factor probabilities for related structures. Acta Cryst. A. 46:1990;900-912.
75. Rice L.M., Brunger A.T. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins Structure Function Genetics. 19:1994;277-290.
76. Rice L.M., Shamoo Y., Brunger A.T. Phase improvement by multi-start simulated annealing refinement and structure factor averaging. J. Appl. Cryst. 31:1998;798-805.
77. Rossmann M.G., Blow D.M. The detection of sub-units within the crystallographic asymmetric unit. Acta Cryst. A. 15:1962;24-51.
78. Saunders M. Stochastic exploration of molecular mechanics energy surfaces: hunting for the global minimum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109:1987;3150-3152.
79. Sevcik J., Dauter Z., Lamzin V.S., Wilson K.S. Ribonuclease from Streptomyces aureofaciens at atomic resolution. Acta Cryst. D. 52:1996;327-344.
80. Shamoo Y., Krueger U., Rice L.M., Williams K.R., Steitz T.A. Crystal structure of the two RNA-binding domains of human hnRNP A1 at 1.75 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1997;215-222.
81. Silva A.M., Rossmann M.G. The refinement of southern bean mosaic virus in reciprocal space. Acta Cryst. B. 41:1985;147-157.
82. Stec B., Zhou R., Teeter M.M. Full-matrix refinement of the protein crambin at 0.83 Å and 130 K. Acta Cryst. D. 51:1995;663-681.
83. Stein E.G., Rice L.M., Brunger A.T. Torsion angle molecular dynamics is a new, efficient tool for NMR structure calculation. J. Magn. Reson. B. 124:1997;154-164.
84. Sussman J.L., Holbrook S.R., Church G.M., Kim S.-H. Structure-factor least-squares refinement procedure for macromolecular structure using constrained and restrained parameters. Acta Cryst. A. 33:1977;800-804.
85. Ulyanov N.B., Schmitz U., James T.L. Metropolis Monte Carlo calculations of DNA structure using internal coordinates and NMR distance restraints: an alternative method for generating a high-resolution solution structure. J. Biomol. NMR. 3:1993;547-568.
86. Verlet L. Computer experiments on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys. Rev. 159:1967;98-105.
87. Vlassi M., Dauter Z., Wilson K.S., Kokkinidis M. Structural parameters for proteins derived from the atomic resolution (1.09 Å) structure of a designed variant of the colE1 ROP protein. Acta Cryst. D. 54:1998;1245-1260.
88. Weis W.I., Brunger A.T., Skehel J.J., Wiley D.C. Refinement of the influenza virus haemagglutinin by simulated annealing. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1989;737-761.
89. Wüthrich K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. 1986;Wiley, New York.
90. Xu Y., Krishna N.R. Structure determination from NOESY intensities using a metropolis simulated-annealing (MSA) refinement of dihedral angles. J. Mag. Res. B. 108:1995;192-196.