Structure calculation from NMR data

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 617-623

  Nilges, Michael ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030271733     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80027-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Brünger AT, Nilges M Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X ray crystallography and solution NMR spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys 1993, 26:49-125.
2. Braun W Distance geometry and related methods for protein structure determination from NMR data. Q Rev Biophys 1987, 19:115-157.
3. Kuntz ID, Thomason JF, Oshiro CM Distance geometry. Methods Enzymol 1989, 177:159-204.
4. Havel TF An evaluation of computational strategies for use in the determination of protein structure from distance constraints obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance. Prog Biophys Mol Bio/1991, 56:43-78.
5. Güntert P, Wüthrich K Improved efficiency of protein structure calculations from NMR data using the program diana with redundant dihedral angle constraints. J Biomol NMR 1991, 1:447-456.
6. Nilges M, Gronenborn AM, Brünger AT, Clore GM Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins by simulated annealing with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin, potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor and barley serine proteinase inhibitor 2. Protein Eng 1988, 2:27-38.
7. Van Schaik RC, Berendsen HJ, Torda AE, van Gunsteren WF A structure refinement method based on molecular dynamics in four spatial dimensions. J Mol Biol 1 993, 234:751-762.
8. Nakai T, Kidera A, Nakamura H Intrinsic nature of the three-dimensional structure of proteins as determined by distance geometry with good sampling properties. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:19-40.
9. Rice LM, Brünger AT: Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement Proteins 1994, 19:277-290.
10. Ulyanov NB, Schmilz U, James TL Metropolis Monte Carlo calculations of DNA structure using internal coordinates and NMR distance restraints: an alternative method for generating a high-resolution solution structure. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:547-568.
11. Nietlispach D, Clowes RT, Broadhurst RW, Ito Y, Keeler J, Kelly M, Ashurst J, Oschkinat H, Domaille P, Laue ED An approach to the structure determination of larger proteins using triple resonance NMR experiments in conjunction with random fractional deuteration. J Am Chem Soc 1996, 118:407-415. Random deuteration increases the sensitivity of three- and four-dimensional NMR experiments. A 50% deuteration level is suggested as optimal for experiments used for resonance assignments, and as a good compromise for NOE spectroscopy experiments.
12. Venters RA, Metzler WJ, Spicer LD, Mueller L, Farmer BT Use of 1H-N-1H-N NOEs to determine protein global folds in perdeuterated proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117:9592-9593. An evaluation of the effect of very sparse data sets from completely deuterated samples on the structure determination.
13. Aszodi A, Gradwell MJ, Taylor WR Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1995, 251:308-326. This model study uses additional data such as distance distributions derived from the protein data bank to fold correctly proteins with very few distance restraints. The metric matrix algorithm contains a fast alternative to metrization, and the iterative embedding strategy allows weighting distance constraints differently during the calculation.
14. Hoogstraten CG, Choe S. Westler WM, Markley JL: Comparison of the accuracy of protein solution structures derived from conventional and network-edited NOE spectroscopy data. Protein Sci 1995, 4:2289-2299. Spin diffusion is suppressed in selected spectral regions by exploiting the different sign of NOE and ROE intensities. The accuracy of the NMR structures calculated on the basis of the network-edited data is improved with respect to structures derived from standard NOESY data.
15. 15N-bonded amide protons during the mixing time.
16. James TL Relaxation matrix analysis of two dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1991, 1:1042-1053.
17. Bonvin AMJJ, Boelens R, Kaptein R Determination of biomolecular structures by NMR: use of relaxation matrix calculations. In Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems: Theoretical and Expérimental Applications, vol 2. Edited by Van Gunsteren WF, Weiner PK, Wilkinson AJ. Leiden: Escom; 1993:407-440.
18. Dellwo MJ, Wand J Computationally efficient gradients for relaxation matrix-based structure refinement including the accommodation of internal motions. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:205-214.
19. Yip P A computationally efficient method for evaluating the gradient of 2D NOESY intensities. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:361-365.
20. Liu H, Spielmann HP, Ulyanov NB, Wemmer DE, James TL Interproton distance bounds from 2D NOE intensities: effect of experimental noise and peak integration errors. J Biomol NMR 1995. 6:390-402. Significant errors can be introduced in distance estimates derived from NOE intensities via a complete relaxation-matrix procedure if the intensities contain experimental noise. A modification of the standard approach that reduces the effect of noise on the distance estimation is suggested.
21. Brüschweiler R, Case D Characterization of biomolecular structure and dynamics by cross relaxation. Progr Nucl Magn Reson Spectros 1994, 26:27-58.
22. Redfield C, Boyd J, Smith U, Smith RAG, Dobson CM Loop mobility in a four helix bundle protein: 15N NMR relaxation measurements on human interleukin-4. Biochemistry 1992, 31:10431-10437
23. Berndt KD, Güntert P, Wüthrich K Conformational sampling by NMR solutions structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water. Proteins 1996, 24:304-313. The sampling of conformational space of an NMR structure ensemble is compared in detail with that of MD trajectories. The sampling is found to be similar to that offered by a long MD trajectory.
24. Van Gunsteren WF, Brunne RM, Gros P, Van Schaik RC, Schiffer CA, Torda AE Accounting for molecular mobility in structure determination based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and X ray diffraction data. Methods Enzymol 1994, 261:619-654.
25. Nanzer AP, Van Gunsteren WF, Torda AE Parametrization of time averaged distance restraints in MD simulations. J Biomol NMR 1995, 6:313-320. An evaluation of the influence of parameters for time-averaged distance restraints, especially with regard to numerical stability.
26. Kemmink J, Scheek RM Dynamic modelling of a helical peptide in solution using NMR data: multiple conformations and multispin effects. J Biomol NMR 1995, 5:33-40. A simultaneous treatment of dynamics and spin diffusion in structure refinement, using ensemble averages in a direct refinement against NOE intensities.
27. Bonvin AM, Brünger AT Conformational variability of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures. J Mol Biol 1995, 250:80-93. A novel ensemble refinement method uses a free R-factor search to determine the optimal number of conformers in the ensemble. The ensemble of refined structures defines a probability density, from which representative conformations can be deduced with an X-ray-like refinement.
28. Fennen J, Torda AE, Van Gunsteren WF Structure refinement with molecular dynamics and a Boltzmann weighted ensemble. J Biomol NMR 1 995, 6:1 63-1 70. Populations in an ensemble refinement are determined and continuously updated during MD with Boltzmann weights. Ensemble-averaged distance restraints are preferable to time-averaged restraints if different molecular conformers are separated by large energy barriers.
29. Ulyanov NB, Schmilz U, Kumar A, James TL Probability assessment of conformational ensembles: sugar repuckering in a DNA duplex in solution. Biophys J 1995, 68:13-24. Populations are determined from a fit to NOE data in a Monte Carlo driven ensemble calculation. A comparison with an alternative ensemble method shows that the detailed multiconformational description of solution DNA structure remains ambiguous.
30. Bonvin AMJJ, Brunger AT: Do NOE distances contain enough distance information to access the relative populations of multi conformer structures? J Biomol NMR 1995, 5:72-76. A free R-factor analysis shows that the amount of information in NMR distances is insufficient to determine populations even with ideal data.
31. Briischweiler R, Roux B, Blackledge M, Griesinger C, Karplus M, Ernst RR Influence of rapid intramolecular motion of NMR cross-relaxation rates: a molecular dynamics study of antanamide in solution. J Am Chem Soc 1992, 114:2289-2302.
32. Abseher R, L demann S, Schreiber H, Steinhauser O NMR cross relaxation investigated by molecular dynamics simulation: a case study of ubiquitin in solution. J Mol Biol 1995, 249:606-624. Cross-relaxation rates are derived from an MD trajectory. The effects of local dynamics on NOE-derived distances are analyzed in detail, and correction factors are suggested.
33. n) and J(O) is observed, indicating a two-component motion for all vectors.
34. Desvaux H, Berthault P, Birlirakis N, Goldman M Off resonance ROESY for the study of dynamic processes. J Magn Reson Ser A 1994, 108:219-229.
35. Brüschweiler R Connections between NMR relaxation measurements and theoretical models of structural dynamics of biopolymers in solution. Understanding Chem React 1994, 8:303-334.
36. Sunada S, Go N Calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters in proteins by normal mode analysis. J Chem Phys 1996, 104:4768-4775. Information on larger-scale protein dynamics is deduced from the relationship between normal mode calculations and NMR order parameters. The order parameter can be calculated reliably for proton pairs separated by up to 10 covalent bonds.
37. Bax A, Vuister GW, Grzesiek S, Delaglio F, Wang AC, Tschudin R, Zhu G Measurement of homo- and heteronuclear J couplings from quantitative J correlation. Methods Enzymol 1994, 239:79-105.
38. 3J coupling constants. Biochemistry 1994, 33:5481-5492.
39. Kim Y, Prestegard JH Refinement of the NMR structures for acyl carrier protein with scalar coupling data. Proteins 1990, 8:377-385.
40. Garrett DS, Kuszewski J, Hancock TJ, Lodi PJ, Vuister GW, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM The impact of direct refinement against three-bond NH-CaH coupling constants on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson Ser B 1994, 104:99-103.
41. Mierke DF, Huber T, Kessler H: Coupling constants again: experimental restraints in structure refinement J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:29-40.
42. Torda AE, Brunne RM, Huber T, Kessler H, Van Gunsteren WF Structure refinement using time-averaged J coupling constant restraints. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:55-66.
43. 1H NMR chemical shifts to measure the quality of protein structures. J Mol Biol 1 995, 247:541 -546. Proton chemical shifts are calculated from three-dimensional structures of proteins. Differences between measured and calculated proton chemical shifts are a good indicator for structural or assignment errors.
44. Asakura T, Taoka K, Demura M, Williamson MP The relationship between amide proton chemical shifts and secondary structure in proteins. J Biomol NMR 1995, 6:227-236. An empirical parametrization of amide chemical shifts is derived. 45.
45. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM: The impact of direct refinement against proton chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson Ser B 1995, 107:293-297. The refinement leads to small structural rearrangements in the order of the precision of the structure, while significantly improving the fit to the chemical shift data. The largest changes are observed in the region of the active site near a tryptophan residue.
46. 13Cβ chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson Ser B 1995. 106:92-96. The improved fit to chemical shifts is possible with very small structural changes and without signifiant increase in fit to other experimental data. The empirical chemical shifts complement other information on backbone geometry, such as couling constants, and can be included in the refinement at minimal computational cost.
47. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 1991, 113:5490-5492.
48. Otdfield E Chemical shifts and three-dimensional protein structures. J Biomol NMR 1995, 5:217-225. A review on all aspects of chemical shifts in protein structures.
49. Pearson JG, Wang JP, Markley JL, Le Hong B, Oldfield E Protein structures refinement using 13C chemical shifts and quantum chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117:8823-8829. Pilot study of direct refinement against ab initio chemical shifts, restricted to valine and alanine residues because of the computational expense. The structural changes are small.
50. Nilges M Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints: automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities. J Mol Biol 1995, 245:645-660. Ambiguous NOE data are used directly in ab initio simulated annealing calculations, without explicit assignment to proton pairs. Global convergence to the correct fold can be achieved even without unambiguous NOEs.
51. Mumenthaler C, Braun W Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry. J Mol Biol 1996, 254:465-480. Ambiguous NOEs are assigned automatically by analysis of systematic restraint violations. The algorithm can also identify restraints attributable to noise peaks.
52. Meadows RP, Olejniczak ET, Fesik SW A computer-based protocol for semiautomated assignments and 3D structure determination of proteins. J Biomol NMR 1994, 4:79-96.
53. Güntert P, Berndt KD, Wüthrich K The program ASNO for computer supported collection of NOE upper distance constraints as input for protein structure determination. J Biomol NMR 1993, 3:601-606.
54. Nilges M, Habazettl J, Brünger AT, Holak TA Relaxation matrix refinement of the solution structure of squash trypsin inhibitor. JMo/B/o/1991, 219:499-510.
55. Nilges M A calculation strategy for the structure determination of symmetric dimers by 1H NMR. Proteins 1993, 17:297-309.
56. O'Donoghue SI, King GF, Nilges M Calculation of symmetric multimer structures from NMR data using a priori knowledge of the monomer structure, co-monomer restraints, and interface mapping: the case of leucine zippers. J Biomol NMR 1996. in press. New calculation protocols are developed for the case of leucine zippers to incorporate ambiguous data. The protocol yields significant improvement in convergence rate.
57. Kharrat A, Macias MJ, Gibson T, Nilges M, Pastore A Structure of . the dsRNA binding domain of E. coli RNase III. EMBO J 1995, 14:3572-3584. The structure is derived from the data using an iterative NOE assignment scheme with ambiguous distance restraints. The initially unambiguously assigned NOEs are insufficient to determine the fold of the domain.
58. Antz C, Neidig KP, Kalbitzer HR A general Bayesian method for an automated signal class recognition in 2D NMR spectra combined with a multivariate discriminant analysis. J Biomol WMR1995, 5:287-296. Statistical methods are used to distinguish spectral artefacts, noise, and solvent peaks from useful experimental information.
59. Musco G, Stier G, Joseph C, Castiglione Morelli MA, Nilges M, Gibson TJ, Pastore A Three dimensional structure and stability of the KH domain: molecular insights into the fragile X syndrome. Cell 1996, 85:237-246.
60. Macias MJ, Musacchio A, Ponstingl H, Nilges M, Saraste M, Oschkinat H Structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from β-spectrin. Nature 1994, 369:675-677.
61. Hyvönen M, Macias MJ, Nilges M, Oschkinat H, Saraste M, Wilmanns M Structure of the binding site for inositol phosphates in a PH domain. EMBO J 1995, 14:4676-4685. The crystal structure is solved from the automatically refined NMR ensemble by molecular replacement. The uncertainty in the structures is used as a pseudo B factor to weight different parts of the molecule in the molecularreplacement program.
62. Oschkinat H, Croft D Automated assignment of multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Methods Enzymol 1994, 239:308-318.
63. 15N separated NOE data: a novel real space ab initi'o approach. J Mol Biol 1994, 243:696-718.
64. Brünger AT, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Saffrich R, Nilges M Assessing the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross validation. Science 1993, 261:328-331.