The hydrophobic properties of GroEL: A review of ligand effects on the modulation of GroEL hydrophobic surfaces

Cell Stress and Chaperones

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 177-190

  Brazil, B T ^a   Horowitz, P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; LIGAND;

HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROEL PROTEIN; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEIN FOLDING; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032831931     PISSN: 13558145     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1379/1466-1268(1999)004<0177:THPOGA>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Andrade MA, Chacon P, Merelo JJ and Moran F (1993) Evaluation of secondary structure of proteins from circular dischroism spectra using an unsupervised learning neural network. Prot Eng 6: 383-390
2. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181: 223-230
3. Azem A, Diamant S and Goloubinoff P (1994) Effect of divalent cations on the molecular structure of the GroEL oligomer. Biochemistry 33: 6671-6675
4. Badcoe IG, Smith CJ, Wood S, Halsall DJ, Holbrook JJ, Lund P and Clarke AR (1991) Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 30: 9195-9200
5. Boisvert DC, Wang J, Otwinowski Z, Horwich AL and Sigler PB (1996) The 2.4 A crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPgammaS. Nat Struct Biol 3: 170-177
6. Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hedge R, Boisvert DC, Joachimiak A, Horwich AL and Sigler PB (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371: 578-586
7. Brazil BT, Cleland JL, McDowell RS, Skelton NJ, Paris K and Horowitz PM (1997) Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structure can be recognized by the chaperonin GroEL (Cpn60). J Biol Chem 272: 5105-5111
8. Brazil BT, Buckle AM, Demeler B, Fersht AR and Horowitz PM (1998a) The binding of 4,4′-bis (1-anilino-8-napthalenesulfonic Acid) to the GroEl apical domain fragment is cooperative and induces the formation of a folding intermediate with increased hydrophobic surface exposure. J Mol Biol (in press)
9. 2+ GroEL interactions. J Biol Chem 273:
10. Buchner J, Schmidt M, Fuchs M, Jaenicke R, Schmid FX and Kiefhaber T (1991) GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry 30: 1586-1591
11. Buckle AM, Zahn R and Fersht AR (1997) A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 3571-3575
12. Carrell RW and Lomas DA (1997) Conformational disease. Lancet 350: 134-138
13. Chan HS and Dill KA (1996) A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins 24: 345-351
14. Coyle JE, Jaeger J, Gross M, Robinson CV and Radford SE (1997) Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by. Folding & Design 2: R93-104
15. Deb Burman SK, Raymond GJ, Caughey B and Lindquist S (1997) Chaperone-supervised conversion of prion protein to its protease-resistant form. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13938-13943
16. Diamant S, Azem A, Weiss C and Goloubinoff P (1995) Effect of free and ATP-bound magnesium and manganese ions on the ATPase activity of chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34: 273-277
17. Eftink MR and Ionescu R (1997) Thermodynamics of protein unfolding: questions pertinent to testing the validity of the two-state model. Biophys Chem 64: 175-197
18. Ellis RJ and van der Vies SM (1991) Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem 60: 321-347
19. Ewalt KL, Hendrick JP, Houry WA and Hartl FU (1997) In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 90: 491-500
20. Fayet O, Zieghelhoffer T and Georgopopulos C (1989) The GroES and GroEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J Bact 171: 1379-1385
21. Fenton WA, Kashi Y, Furtak K and Horwhich AL (1994) Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371: 614-619
22. Fisher G and Schmid FX (1990) The mechanism of protein folding. Implications of in vitro refolding models for de novo folding and translocation in the cell. Biochemistry 29: 2205-2215
23. Fisher MT (1992) Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the Presence of GroEL (Chaperonin-60) and ATP. Biochemistry 31: 3955-3963
24. Gasset M, Baldwin MA, Fletterick RJ and Pruisner SB (1993) Perturbation of the secondary structure of the scrapie prion protein under conditions that alter infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90: 1-5
25. Georgopoulos CP, Hendrix RW, Casjens SR and Kaiser AD (1973) Host participation in bacteriophage lambda head assembly. J Mol Biol 76: 45-60
26. Gething MJ and Sambrook J (1992) Protein folding in the cell. Nature 355: 33-45
27. Gibbons DL and Horowitz PM (1995) Exposure of hydrophobic surfaces on the chaperonin GroEL oligomer by protonation or modification of His-401. J Biol Chem 270: 7335-7340
28. Gorovits B and Horowitz PM (1995) The chaperonin GroEL is destabilized by binding of ADP. J Biol Chem 270: 28551-28556
29. Corovits BM, Ybarra J and Horowitz PM (1997) ATP hydrolysis is critical for induction of conformational changes in GroEL that expose hydrophobic surfaces. J Biol Chem 272: 6842-6845
30. Gray TE and Fersht AR (1993) Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J Mol Biol 232: 1197-1207
31. Hainaut P and Millier J (1992) Interaction of heta-shock protein 70 with p53 translated in vitro: evidence for interaction with dimeric p53 and for a role in the regulation of p53 conformation. EMBO J 11: 3513-3520
32. Harrison PM, Chan HS, Prusiner SB and Cohen FE (1999) Thermodynamics of model prions and its implications for the problem of prion protein folding. J Mol Biol 286: 593-606
33. Hayer-Hartl MK, Ewbank JJ, Creighton TE and Hartl FU (1994) Conformational specificity of the folding of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin. The EMBO Journal 13: 3192-3202
34. Horowitz PM, Hua S and Gibbons DL (1995) Hydrophobic surfaces that are hidden in chaperonin Cpn60 can be exposed by formation of assembly-competent monomers or by ionic perturbation of the oligomer. J Biol Chem 270: 1535-1542
35. Itzhaki LS, Otzen DE and Fersht AR (1995) Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 34: 14581-14587
36. Jackson GS, Staniforth RA, Haisall DJ, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ, Clarke AR, and Burston SG (1993) Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry 32: 2554-2563
37. Jaenicke R and Seckler R (1997) Protein misassembly in vitro. In: Richards FM, Eisenberg DS, Kim PM and Wetzel R (Eds), Advances in Protein Chemistry. Sandiego: Academic Press
38. Katsumata K, Okazaki A, Tsurupa GP and Kuwajima K (1996) Dominant forces ion the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of alspha-Lactalbumin by GroEL. J Mol Biol 264: 643-649
39. Krauss O and Gore MG (1996) Refolding and reassociation of glycerol dehydrogenase from bacillus stearothermophilus in the absence and presence of GroEL. Eur J Biochem 241: 538-545
40. Kuwajima K (1989) The molten-globule state as a clue for understanding the folding and cooperativity of globular-protein structure. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 6: 87-103
41. Kyte J and Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydrophobia character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157: 105-132
42. Laminet AA, Ziegelhoffer T, Georgopoulos C and Pluckthun A (1990) The Eschericia coli heta shock proteins GroEL and GroES modulate the folding of the beta-lactamase precursor. The EMBO Journal 9: 2315-2319
43. Landry SJ and Gierasch LM (1991) The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. Biochemistry 30: 7359-7362
44. Lansbury PT Jr (1992) In pursuit of the molecular structure of amyloid plaque: new technology provides unexpected and critical information. Biochemsitry 31: 6865-6870
45. Li XL, Lei XD, Cai H, Li J, Yang SL, Wang CC and Tsou CL (1998) Binding of a burst-phase intermediate formed in the folding of denatured D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase by chaperonin 60 and 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic Acid. Biochem J 331: 505-511
46. Lin Z, Schwarz FP and Eisenstein E (1995) The Hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J Biol Chem 270: 1011-1014
47. Lund ARCaPA (1996) Kinetic and energetic aspects of chaperonin function. In: Ellis RJ (ed.) The Chaperonins New York: Academic Press
48. Mattingly JR Jr, Iriarte A and Carrion-Martinez M (1995) Homologous proteins with different affinites for GroEL. J Biol Chem 270: 1138-1148
49. Mendoza JA, Rogers E, Lorimer GH and Horowitz PM (1991) Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese. J Biol Chem 266: 13044-13049
50. Mizobata T, Akiyama Y, Ito K, Yumoto N and Kawata Y (1992) Effects of the chaperonin GroE on the refolding of tryptophanase from Escerichia coli. J Biol Chem 267: 1773-1779
51. Neugebauer BH, Rudolph R, Schmidt M and Buchner J (1991) Reconstitution of a heat shock effect in vitro: influence of GroE on the thermal aggregation of alpha-glucosidase from yeast. Biochemistry 30: 11609-11614
52. Onuchic JN, Schulten ZLS and Wolynes PG (1997) Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem 48: 545-600
53. Pelham HRB (1986) Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell 46: 959-961
54. Perrett S, Zahn R, Stenberg G and Fersht AR (1997) Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J Mol Biol 269: 892-901
55. Persson M, Carlsson U and Bergenhem N (1997) GroEL provides a folding pathway with lower apparent activation energy compared to spontaneous refolding of human carbonic anhydrase II. FEBS Letters 411: 43-47
56. Ptitsyn OB, Pain RH, Semisotnov GV and Razgulyaev OI (1990) Evidence for a molten globule state as a general intermediate in protein folding. FEBS Letters 262: 20-24
57. Richarme G and Kohiyama M (1994) Amino acid specificity of the Escerichia coli chaperone GroEL (Heat Shock Protein 60). J Biol Chem 69: 7095-7098
58. Roseman AM, Chen S, White H, Braig K and Saibil HR (1996) The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosterk switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 87: 241-251
59. Schmidt M and Buchner J (1992) Interaction of GroE with an all-B-protein. J Biol Chem 267: 16829-16833
60. Seale JW, Martinez JL and Horowitz PM (1995) Photoincorporation of 4,4′-Bis(1-anilino-8-napthalenesulfonic Acid) into the apical domain of GroEL: specific information from a nonspecific probe. Biochemistry 34: 7443-7449
61. Seale JW, Brazil BT and Horowitz PM (1997) Photoincorporation of a fluorscent probe into GroEL: defining the site of interaction. Methods in Enzymology 290: 318-323
62. Sigler PB and Horwich AL (1995) Unliganded GroEL at 2.8 A: structure and functional implications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 348: 113-119
63. Staniforth RA, Burston SG, Atkinson T and Clarke AR (1994a) Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. Biochem J 300: 651-658
64. Staniforth RA, Cortes A, Burston SG, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ and Clarke AR (1994b) The stability and hydrophobicity of cytosolic and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenases and their relation to chaperonin-assisted folding. FEBS Letters 344: 129-135
65. Surin AK, Kotova NV, Kashparov IA, Marchenkov VV, Marchenkova YS and Semisotnov GV (1997) Ligands regulate GroEL thermostability. FEBS Letters 405: 260-262
66. Taubes G (1996) Misfolding the way to disease (news). Science 271: 1493-1495
67. Thomas PJ (1992) The cytsic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. J Biol Chem 267: 5727-5730
68. Thomas PJ, Qu BH and Pedersen PL (1995) Defective protein folding as a basis of human disease. Trends in Bioch Sci 20: 456-459
69. Todd MJ, Viitanen PV and Lorimer GH (1994) Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265: 659-666
70. Todd MJ, Lorimer GH and Thirumalai D (1996) Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93: 4030-4035
71. Vankeerberghen A, Wei L, Jaspers M, Cassiman JJ, Nilius B and Cuppens H (1998) Characterization of 19 disease-associated missense mutations in the regulatory domain of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Hum Mol Genet 7: 1761-1769
72. + dependent. Biochemistry 29: 5665-5671
73. Viitanen PV, Donaldson GK, Lorimer GH, Luben TH and Gatenby AA (1991) Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 30: 9716-9723
74. Viitanen PV, Gatenby AA and Lorimer GH (1992) Purified chaperonin 60 (GroEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci 1: 363-369
75. Wang JD, Michelitsch MD and Weissman JS (1998) GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 12163-12168
76. Wetzel R (1997) Aggregation and accesory proteins in the pathology of protein-folding diseases. Molecular chaperones in the Life Cycle of Protein: Structure, Function, and Mode of Action. In: Fink AL and Goto Y, (Eds). New York: Marcel Decker
77. White ZW, Fisher KE and Eisenstein E (1995) A monomeric variant of GroEL binds nucleotides but is inactive as a molecular chaperone. J Biol Chem 270: 20404-20409
78. Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN and Thirumali D (1995) Navigating the folding routes. Science 267: 1619-1620
79. Xu Z, Horwich AL and Sigler PB (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex [see Comments]. Nature 388: 741-750
80. Yifrach O and Horovitz A (1995) Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34: 5303-5308
81. Zahn R, Spitzfaden C, Ottiger M, Wutrich K and Pluckthun A (1994a) Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature 368: 261-265
82. Zahn R, Axmann SE, Rucknagel KP, Jaeger E, Laminet AA and Pluckthun A (1994b) Thermodynamic partitioning model for Hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. I. GroEL recognizes the signal sequences of B-lactamase precursor. J Mol Biol 242: 150-164
83. Zahn R and Pluckthun A (1994c) Thermodynamic partitioning model for Hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature beta-lactamase. J Mol Biol 242: 165-174
84. Zahn R, Buckle AM, Perrett S, Johnson CM, Corrales FJ, Golbik R and Fersht AR (1996) Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 15024-15029
85. Zheng X, Rosenberg LE, Kalousek F and Fenton WA (1993) GroEL, GroES, and ATP-dependent folding and spontaneous assembly of ornithine transcarbamylase. 268: 7489-7493