Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 297-303

  Bradnam, Michael S ^a,b,d   Montgomery, Donald M I ^b   Evans, Aled L ^a   Keating, David ^a,b   McClure, Elizabeth A ^b   Damato, Bertil E ^b   McFadzean, Robert ^c  

^a West of Scotland Health Boards'   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NHS GREATER GLASGOW AND CLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRODE; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIGNAL DETECTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0029863642     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.297     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Copenhaver RM, Beinhocker GD. Evoked occipital potentials recorded from scalp electrodes in response to focal visual illumination. Invest Ophthalmol 1963; 2: 393-406.
2. Beinhocker GD, Brooks PR, Anfenger E, Copenhaver RM. Electroperimetry. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng BME 1966; 13: 11-8.
3. Schreinemachers HP, Henkes HE. Relation between localized retinal stimuli and the visual evoked response in man. Ophthalmology 1968; 155: 2-27.
4. Henkes HE, Van Lith GHM. Electroperimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1973; 2: 245-51.
5. Cappin JM, Nissim S. Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1975; 93: 9-18.
6. Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 454-61.
7. Adachi-Usami E, Misago M, Kanayama N. Electro-perimetry by means of the scotopic VECP. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1978; 15: 179-87.
8. Kojima M, Zrenner E. Determination of local thresholds in the visual field by recording the scotopic visually evoked cortical potential in man. Ophthalmic Res 1980; 12: 1-8.
9. Howe JW, Mitchell KW. Visual evoked potentials from quadrantic field stimulation in the investigation of homonymous field defects. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980: 279-83.
10. Yanashima K. Determination of visual field defects by the visually evoked cortical potential (VECP) decoded by fast Fourier transform (FFT). Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1982; 31: 427-35.
11. Elberger AJ, Spydell JD. Visual field perimetry analysis using evoked potentials in normal and corpus callosum sectioned cats. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60: 249-57.
12. Spehlmann R. Evoked potential primer: visual, auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in clinical diagnosis. Boston: Butterworths, 1985.
13. Halliday AM. Evoked potentials in clinical testing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982.
14. Galloway NR. Evoked responses and the eye [Review]. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986; 105: 273-86.
15. Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J. The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 1976; 99: 357-74.
16. Halliday AM. Evoked responses in organic and functional sensory loss. In: Fessard A, Lelord G, eds. Activities evoquees et leur conditionment chez l'homme normal et en pathologie mentale. Paris: Editions Inserm, 1972: 189-212.
17. Cobb WA, Dawson GD. The latency and form in man of the occipital potentials evoked by bright flashes. J Physiol Lond 1960; 152: 108-52.
18. Regan D. Steady-state evoked potentials. J Opt Soc Am 1977; 67: 1475-89.
19. Regan D. Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. New York: Elsevier, 1989.
20. Bradnam MS, Cluckie A, Damato BE, Evans AL, Keating D, Montgomery DMI. Adaptive filtering of steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials. Presented at the XXX Symposium of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, May 1992, Vienna, Austria.
21. Cluckie A, Bradnam MS, Evans AL. Measurement of steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials by means of an adaptive noise canceller. Physiol Meas 1994; 15: 429-45.
22. Bradnam MS, Evans AL, Montgomery DMI, Keating D, Damato BE, Cluckie A, et al. A personal computer based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system. Doc Ophthalmol 1994; 86: 81-93.
23. Widrow B, Glover JR, McCool JM, Kaunitz J, Williams CS, Hearn RH, et al. Adaptive noise cancelling: principles and applications. Proc IEEE 1975; 63: 1692-716.
24. Widrow B, Stearns SD. Adaptive signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
25. Hotelling H. The generalisation of Student's ratio. Ann Math Stat 1931; 2: 360-78.
26. Morrison DF. Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976: 128-33.
27. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 1978; 8: 283-98.
28. Harter MR. Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of retinal eccentricity. Vision Res 1970; 10: 1365-76.
29. Bradnam M, Keating D, Montgomery D, Evans A, Damato B, Cluckie A. Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants: optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 79: 151-60.
30. Barber C, Galloway NR. A pattern stimulus for optimal response from the retina. Doc Ophthalmol 1976; 10: 77-86.
31. Horton JC, Hoyt WF. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex: a revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 816-24.
32. McFadzean R, Brosnahan D, Hadley D, Mutlukan E. Representation of the visual field in the occipital striate cortex. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 185-90.
33. Regan D, Milner BA. Objective perimetry by evoked potential recording: limitations. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 44: 393-7.