Protein fold recognition score functions: Unusual construction strategies

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 454-461

  Ayers, Daniel J ^a   Huber, Thomas ^a   Torda, Andrew E ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Force field; Knowledge based protein structure prediction; Optimization; Protein structure; Structure prediction; Threading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING;

COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032790342     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990901)36:4<454::AID-PROT9>3.0.CO;2-B     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Huber T, Torda AE. Proteins fold recognition without Boltzman statistics or explicit physical basis. Protein Sci. 1998;7:142-149.
2. Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. 1. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance or MMFF94. J Comput Chem 1996;17:490-519.
3. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
4. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
5. van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, et al. Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Zurich and Groningen: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zurich and BIOMOS b.v.; 1996.
6. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, et al. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
7. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213: 859-883.
8. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
9. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;227:876-888.
10. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. How optimization of potential functions affects protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:4984-4989.
11. Koretke KK, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Self-consistently optimized statistical mechanical energy functions for sequence structure alignment. Protein Sci 1996;5:1043-1059.
12. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 1164-1179.
13. Ulrich P, Scott W, van Gunsteren WF, Torda AE. Protein structure prediction force fields - parametrization with quasi-Newtonian dynamics. Proteins 1997;27:367-384.
14. Koretke KK, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Self-consistently optimized energy functions for protein structure prediction by molecular dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:2932-2937.
15. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
16. Lathrop RH. The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. Protein Eng 1994;7: 1059-1068.
17. Holm L, Sander C. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:316-319.
18. Holm L, Sander C. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:231-234.
19. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database - fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:206-209.
20. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:3600-3609.
21. Godzik A. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? Protein Sci 1996;5:1325-1338.
22. Feng ZK, Sippl MJ. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold Des 1996;1:123-132.
23. Abola EE, Bernstein FC, Bryant SH, Koetzle TF, Weng J. Protein data bank. In: Allen FH, Bergerhoff G, Sievers R. Crystallographic databases-information content, software systems, scientific applications. Bonn, Cambridge, Chester: Data Commission of the International Union of Crystallography; 1987. p 107-132.
24. Abola EE, Sussman JL, Prilusky J, Manning NO. Protein data bank archives of three-dimensional macromolecular structures. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:556-571.
25. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven protein data bank. Protein Sci 1992;1:409-417.
26. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
27. Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 1997;270:471-480.
28. Huber T, Ayers D, Torda AE, Russell A. Sausage: sequence-structure alignment using a statistical approach guided by experiment: http://www.rsc.anu.edu.au/∼torda/sausage.html and ftp:// ftp.rsc.anu.edu/pub/torda/sausage/README
29. Huber T, Torda AE. Protein sequence threading, the alignment problem and a two step strategy. J Comput Chem 1999; in press.
30. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1970;48:443-453.
31. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J. Mol. Biol. 1992;227:227-238.
32. Sippl MJ. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993;7:473-501.
33. Wilmanns M, Eisenberg D. Inverse protein folding by the residue pair preference profile method: estimating the correctness of alignments of structurally compatible sequences. Protein Eng 1995;8:627-639.
34. Huang X, Miller W. A time-efficient, linear-space local similarity algorithm. Adv Appl Math 1991;12:337-357.
35. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. In: Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: the art of scientific computing. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 1997. p 637-639.
36. Kocher JPA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
37. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
38. Gibrat J-F, Madej T, Bryant SH. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:377-385.