Objective perimetry in glaucoma: Recent advances with multifocal stimuli

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volumn 43, Issue 6 SUPPL., 1999, Pages

  Graham, Stuart L ^a   Klistorner, Alexander ^a   Grigg, John R ^a   Billson, Francis A ^a   Ao, ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Glaucoma; Multifocal techniques; Visual evoked response visual field

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRODE; EQUIPMENT; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CHRONIC DISEASE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032776041     PISSN: 00396257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6257(99)00011-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. Aine C.J., Supek S., George J.S.et al. Retinotopic organisation of human visual cortex. departures from the classical model Cereb Cortex. 6:1996;354-361.
2. Bach M., Hiss P., Rover J. Check-size specific changes of pattern electroretinogram in patients with early open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 69:1988;315-322.
3. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field contribution. Vision Res. 37:1997;675-690.
4. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E., Klein S.A., Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 90:1994;65-81.
5. Bradnam M.S., Montgomery D.M., Evans A.L. Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potential. Br J Ophthalmol. 80:1996;297-303.
6. Bray L.C., Mitchell K.W., Howe J.W. Prognostic significance of the pattern visual evoked potential in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 75:1991;79-83.
7. Brusa A., Mortimer C., Jones S.J. Clinical evaluation of VEPs to interleaved checkboard reversal stimulation of central, hemi- and peripheral fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 96:1995;485-494.
8. Cappin J.M., Nissim S. Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 93:1975;9-18.
9. Cowey A., Polls E.T. Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Exp Brain Res. 21:1974;447-454.
10. Fazio D.T., Heckenlively J.R., Martin D.A., Christensen R.E. The electroretinogram in advanced open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 63:1986;45-54.
11. Fox P.T., Miezin F.M., Allman J.M.et al. Retinotopic organisation of human visual cortex mapped with positron-emission tomography. J Neurosci. 7:1987;913-922.
12. Francois J. L'electroreinographie dans le glaucome. Acta Ophthalmol. 31:1953;205-218.
13. Gazarek S., Henning G., Muller W. Experimental studies of locally generated focal VECP within the 30 degree visual field with LED. Ophthalmologe. 92:1995;113-119.
14. Graham S.L., Drance S.M., Chauhan B.C.et al. Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 37:1996;2651-2662.
15. Graham S.L., Klistorner A. Electrophysiology. a review of signal origins and applications to investigating glaucoma Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 26:1998;71-85.
16. Graham S.L., Wong V.A., Drance S.M., Mikelberg F.S. Pattern electroretinograms from hemifields in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 35:1994;3347-3356.
17. Gray L.G., Galetta S.L., Siegal T., Schatz N.J. The central visual in homonymous hemianopia. Evidence for unilateral foveal representation Arch Neurol. 54:1997;312-317.
18. Groneberg A. Simultan registrierte retinale und kortikale elektrische Antworten auf Kontrastreize. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. 76:1979;453-458.
19. Henkes H.E. Electroretinography. An evaluation of the influence of the retinal and general metabolic condition on the electrical responses of the retina Am J Ophthalmol. 43:1957;67-81.
20. Hetherington A.P.B., Arden G.B., Wolf J.E. Comparison of perimeter testing and mutifocal ERGs in glaucoma (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38(Suppl):1997;S568.
21. Holder G.E. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 71:1987;166-171.
22. Holopigian K., Seiple W., Mayron C., Koty R., Lorenzo M. Electrophysiological and psychophysical flicker sensitivity in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 31:1990;1863-1868.
23. Horton J.C., Hoyt F. The representation of the visual field in the human striate cortex. Arch Ophthalmol. 109:1991;816-824.
24. Howe J.W., Mitchell K.W. Visual evoked potentials from quadrantic field stimulation in the investigation of homonymous field defects. Barber C. Evoked Potentials. 1980;279-283 MTP Press, Lancaster.
25. Howe J.W., Mitchell K.W. Visual evoked potential changes in chronic glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 105:1986;457-462.
26. Johnson C.A., Samuels L.J. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1997;413-425.
27. Katsumi O., Tetsuka S., Mehta M.C.et al. Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response. Ophthalmic Res. 25:1993;119-127.
28. Kawabata H., Yotukura J., Adachi-Usami E. Sensitive mapping of the scotopic visually evoked cortical potential (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1997;4600.
29. Kitano M., Niiyama K., Kasamatsu T., Sutter E.E., Norcia A.M. Retinotopic and nonretinotopic field potentials in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 11:1994;953-977.
30. Klistorner A: Temporal non-linear analysis of human retinal and cortical visual evoked potentials: relation to parallel processing (PhD thesis). University of NSW, Sydney, 1997.
31. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., Billson F.A. Electrode position and multi-focal VEP. role in objective visual field assessment Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 26(Suppl 1):1998;91-94.
32. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., Billson F.A. Multifocal topographic VEP. improving objective detection of local visual field defects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 39:1998;937-950.
33. Korth M., Horn F., Storck B., Jonas J. The pattern-evoked electroretinogram (PERG). Age-related alterations and changes in glaucoma Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 227:1989;123-130.
34. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Multi-channel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems. Exp Brain Res. 35:1979;151-159.
35. Lesevre N. Chronotopographical analysis of the human evoked potentials in relation to the visual field. Bodis-Wollner Evoked Potentials. 1982;156-182 New York Academy of Science, New York.
36. Leydhecker G. The electroretinogram in glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 34:1950;550-554.
37. Mitchell KW: The visual evoked potential in the differential diagnosis of ocular hypertension and chronic simple glaucoma (PhD thesis). University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, 1987.
38. Neoh C., Kaye S.B., Brown M.et al. Pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 78:1994;359-362.
39. O'Donaghue E., Arden G.B., O'Sullivan F. The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 76:1992;387-394.
40. Odom J.V. Kernel analysis. Heckenlively J.R. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. 1991;254-259 Mosby-Year Book, Inc, St Louis.
41. Ohde H., Kimura I., Betsuin Y. The retinotopic response of visual evoked potentials (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38(Suppl):1997;4602.
42. Pfeiffer N., Tillmon B., Bach M. Predictive value of the pattern electroretinogram in high-risk ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 34:1993;1710-1715.
43. Rovamo L., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res. 37:1979;495-510.
44. Ruben S.T., Hitchings R.A., Fitzke F., Arden G.B. Electrophysiology and psychophysics in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. evidence for different pathomechanisms in early glaucoma Eye. 8:1994;516-520.
45. Schlykowa L., van Dijk B.W., Ehrenstein W.H. Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1:1993;169-174.
46. Schmoger E., Zimmer W. Das Elektroretinogramm bei primarem Glaukom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 146:1965;122-123.
47. Sokol S., Domar A., Moskovitz A., Schwarz B. Pattern evoked potential latency and contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 27:1981;79-86.
48. Spekreijse H., Estevez O., Reits D. Visual evoked potentials and the physiological analysis of visual processes in man. Desmedt J.E. Visual Evoked Potentials in Man. 1997;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
49. Sutter E.E. A deterministic approach to non-linear systems analysis. Pinter R.B., Nabet B. Nonlinear Vision. Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Functions and Networks:1992;171-220 CRC Press, Cleveland.
50. Sutter E.E., Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response Vision Res. 32:1992;433-446.
51. Towle V.L., Moskovitz A., Sokol S., Schwartz B. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 24:1983;175-183.
52. Trick G.L. Pattern reversal retinal potentials in ocular hypertensives at high and low risk of developing glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 65:1987;79-85.
53. Uji Y., Yokoyama M. Blue-cone response in glaucomatous eyes studied with electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 31:1982;103.
54. Vaegan Buckl The spatial distribution of ERG losses across the posterior pole of glaucomatous eyes in multifocal recordings. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 24(Suppl):1996;28-31.
55. Van den Berg T.J., Riemslag F.C., de Vos G.W., Verduyn Lunel H.F.E. Pattern ERG and glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol. 61:1986;335-341.
56. Victor J.D., Nonlinear systems analysis in vision overview of kernel methods. Pinter R.B., Nabet B. Nonlinear Vision. Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Functions and Networks:1992;1-37 CRC press, Cleveland.
57. Wanger P., Persson H.E. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms and high-pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 94:1987;1098-1103.
58. Watanabe I., Iijima H., Tsukahara S. The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. an evaluation by relative amplitude from the Bjerrum area Br J Ophthalmol. 73:1989;131-135.
59. Weinstein G.W., Arden G.B., Hitchings R.A.et al. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 106:1988;923-928.