Distinctive electrophoretic isoenzyme profiles in Saccharomyces sensu stricto

International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1907-1913

  Duarte, Filomena L ^a,b   Pais, Célia ^b   Spencer Martins, Isabel ^c   Leão, Cecília ^b  

^a Natl Stn for Viticulture/Enology   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Isoenzyme profiling; Saccharomyces; Yeasts

Indexed keywords

ACID PHOSPHATASE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLUCOSE 6 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; ISOENZYME; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; NONSPECIFIC ESTERASE;

ARTICLE; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CARLSBERGENSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES SENSU STRICTO; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

SACCHAROMYCES BAYANUS; SACCHAROMYCES CARLSBERGENSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS; SACCHAROMYCES PASTORIANUS;

EID: 0032747505     PISSN: 00207713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1907     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Augustyn, O. P. H., Ferreira, D. & Kock, J. L. F. (1991). Differentiation between yeast species, and strains within a species, by cellular fatty acid analysis. 4. Saccharomyces sensu stricto, Hanseniaspora, Saccharomycodes and Wickerhamiella. Syst Appl Microbiol 14, 324-334.
2. Baptist, J. N. & Kurtzman, C. (1976). Comparative enzyme patterns in Cryptococcus laurentii and its taxonomic varieties. Mycologia 68, 1195-1203.
3. de Barros Lopes, M., Soden, A., Martens, A. L., Henschke, P. A. & Langridge, P. (1998). Differentiation and species identification of yeasts using PCR. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 279-286.
4. Brandt, M. E., Bragg, S. L. & Pinner, R. W. (1993). Multilocus enzyme typing of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 31, 2819-2823.
5. Campbell, I. (1972). Numerical analysis of the genera Saccharomyces and Kluyveromyces. J Gen Microbiol 73, 279-301.
6. Doebbeling, B. N., Lehmann, P. F., Hollis, R. J., Wu, L.-C., Widmer, A. F., Voss, A. & Pfaller, M. A. (1993). Comparision of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with isoenzyme profiles as a typing system for Candida tropicalis. Clin Infect Dis 16, 377-383.
7. Eiras-Dias, J. E. (1994). Isoenzyme polymorphism in the identification of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. PhD thesis, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese).
8. Fukazawa, Y., Shinoda, T., Nishikawa, A. & Nakase, T. (1980). Synonymy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hansen 1883 and Saccharomyces uvarum Beijerinck 1898: significance of cell wall antigenes in yeast classification. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30, 196-205.
9. Guillamón, J. M., Barrio, E., Huerta, T. & Querol, A. (1994). Rapid characterization of four species of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex according to mitochondrial DNA patterns. Int J Syst Bacterial 44, 708-714.
10. Hames, B. D. (1981). Introduction to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins - a Practical Approach, pp. 1-91. Edited by B. D. Hames & D. Rickwood. Oxford: IRL Press.
11. James, S. A., Cai, J., Roberts, I. N. & Collins, M. D. (1997). A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Saccharomyces based on 18S rRNA gene sequences: description of Saccharomyces kunashirensis sp. nov. and Saccharomyces martiniae sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 453-460.
12. Kurtzman, C. & Robnett, C. J. (1991). Phylogenetic relationship among species of Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Debaryomyces and Schwanniomyces determined from partial ribosomal RNA sequences. Yeast 7, 61-72.
13. Lehmann, P. F., Kemker, B. J., Hsiao, C.-B. & Dev, S. (1989). Isoenzyme biotypes of Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 27, 2514-2521.
14. Lewicka, K., Mallie, M. & Bastide, J.-M. (1995). Genetic variability in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex revealed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 538-543.
15. Molina, F. I., Inoue, T. & Jong, S.-C. (1992). Ribosomal DNA restriction analysis reveals genetic heterogeneity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex Hansen. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42, 499-502.
16. Montrocher, R., Verner, M.-C., Briolay, J., Gautier, C. & Marmeisse, R. (1998). Phylogenetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae group based on polymorphisms of rDNA spacer sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 295-303.
17. Naumov, G. I., Naumova, E. S., Lantto, R. A., Louis, E. J. & Korhola, M. (1992). Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes. Yeast 8, 599-612.
18. Naumov, G. I., Naumova, E. S. & Sniegowski, P. D. (1997). Differentiation of European and Far East Asian populations of Saccharomyces paradoxus by allozyme analysis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 341-344.
19. Pais, C. (1990). Biochemical studies applied to the taxonomy and physiology of plant parasitic nematodes. PhD thesis, Universidade do Minho, Braga.
20. Poncet, S., Montrocher, R. & Couble, A. (1992). Electrophoretic isoenzyme patterns of some yeast strains used in wine industry. Cryptogam Mycol 13, 283-293.
21. Rodrigues de Sousa, H., Madeira-Lopes, A. & Spencer-Martins, I. (1995). The significance of active fructose transport and maximum temperature for growth in the taxonomy of Saccharomyces sensu stricto. Syst Appl Microbiol 18, 44-51.
22. Rohlf, J. F. (1992). NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate System version 1.70. New York: Applied Biostatistics.
23. Selander, R. K., Caugant, D. A., Ochman, H., Musser, J. M., Gilmour, M. N. & Whittman, T. S. (1986). Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 51, 873-884.
24. Shaw, C. & Prasad, R. (1970). Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes - a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4, 297-320.
25. Sidenberg, D. G. & Lachance, M.-A. (1986). Electrophoretic isoenzyme variation in Kluyveromyces populations and revision of Kluyveromyces marxianus (Hansen) van der Walt. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36, 94-102.
26. Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: Freeman.
27. Subden, R. E., Irwin, D., Cunningham, J. D. & Meiering, A. G. (1982). Wine yeast isozymes. I. Genetic differences in 18 stock cultures. Can J Microbiol 28, 1047-1050.
28. Tornai-Lehoczki, J. & Dlauchy, D. (1996). An opportunity to distinguish species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto by electrophoretic separation of the larger chromosomes. Lett Appl Microbiol 23, 227-230.
29. Vaughan Martini, A. & Martini, A. (1987). Three newly delimited species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 53, 77-84.
30. Vaughan Martini, A. & Martini, A. (1989). A proposal for correct nomenclature of the domesticated species of the genus Saccharomyces. In Biotechnology Applications in Beverage Production, pp. 1-16. Edited by C. Cantarelli & G. Lanzarini. London: Elsevier.
31. Vaughan Martini, A., Martini, A. & Cardinali, G. (1993). Electrophoretic karyotyping as a taxonomic tool in the genus Saccharomyces. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 63, 145-146.
32. van der Walt, J. P. & Yarrow, D. (1984). Methods for isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. In The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study, pp. 45-104. Edited by N. J. W. Kreger van Rij. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
33. Yamazaki, M., Goto, S. & Komagata, K. (1983). An electrophoretic comparison of the enzymes of Saccharomyces yeasts. J Gen Appl Microbiol 29, 305-318.