Folding Lennard-Jones proteins by a contact potential

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 544-553

  Clementi, Cecilia ^a,b,d   Vendruscolo, Michele ^c   Maritan, Amos ^a,b   Domany, Eytan ^c  

^a INFM   (Italy)

^b ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact map; Molecular dynamic simulation; Monte Carlo simulation; Off lattice model; Protein folding problem

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIMULATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

DRUG DESIGN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032732094     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991201)37:4<544::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anfinsen C. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
2. Finkelstein AV. Protein structure: what is it possible to predict now? Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:60-71.
3. Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. How accurate must potentials be for successful modeling of protein folding? J Chem Phys 1995;103:9482-9491.
4. Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Statistical mechanics of simple models of protein folding and design. Biophys J 1997;73:3192-3210.
5. Vendruscolo M, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Stability threshold as a selection principle for protein design. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:3967-3970.
6. Mirny L, Domany E. Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins 1996;26:391-410.
7. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des 1997;2:295-306.
8. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
9. Chan HS, Dill KA. Origins of structure in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6388-6392.
10. Godzik A, Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Regularities in interaction patterns of globular proteins. Protein Eng 1993;6:801-810.
11. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
12. Hinds DA, Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 1994;243:668-682.
13. Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN, Thirumalai D. Navigating the folding routes. Science 1995;267:1619-1620.
14. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Efficient dynamics in the space of contact maps. Fold Design 1998;3:329-336.
15. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? Anew approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 1164-1179.
16. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256: 623-644.
17. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM. Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:7195-7199.
18. Clementi C, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Folding, design and determination of interaction potentials using off-lattice dynamics of model heteropolymers. Phys Rev Lett 1998;81:3287-3290.
19. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to rotate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1976;32:922-923. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1978;34:827-828.
20. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to rotate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1976;32:922-923. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1978;34:827-828.
21. Seno F, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Interaction potentials for protein folding. Proteins 1998;30:244-248.
22. Van Mourik J, Clementi C, Maritan A, Seno F, Banavar JR. Determination of interaction potentials of amino acids from native protein structures: Tests on simple lattice models. J Chem Phys 1998;110:10123-10133.
23. Flory P. Principles of polymer chemistry, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1953.
24. Veitshans T, Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways, and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. Fold Design 1997;2:1-22. Scheek RM, Van Gunsteren WF, Kaptein R. Meth Enzymol 1989;177:204-218.
25. Veitshans T, Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways, and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. Fold Design 1997;2:1-22. Scheek RM, Van Gunsteren WF, Kaptein R. Meth Enzymol 1989;177:204-218.
26. Casetti L. Efficient sympletic algorithms for numerical simulations of Hamiltonian flows. Phys Scripta 1995;51:29-34.
27. Lebowitz JL, Percus JK, Verlet L. Ensemble dependence of fluctuations with application to machine computation. Phys Rev 1967;153:250-254.
28. Rosenblatt F. Principles of neurodynamics. New York: Spartan books; 1962.
29. Minsky ML, Papert SA. Perceptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1969.
30. Krauth W, Mezard M. Learning algorithms with optimal stability in neural networks. J Phys 1987;A20:L745-L752.