Error assessment due to coronary stents in flow-encoded phase contrast MR angiography: A phantom study

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 899-902

  Lethimonnier, F ^a,b   Bouligand, B ^a   Thouveny, F ^a   Furber, A ^a   Jallet, P ^a   Caron Poitreau, C ^a   Le Jeune, J J ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b GE Medical Systems   (France)

Author keywords

Artifact; Coronary artery; MRI; Phantom; Phase contrast; Stent; Velocity measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARTIFACTS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; STENTS;

EID: 0032709110     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<899::AID-JMRI40>3.0.CO;2-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Edelman RR, Manning WJ, Gerinivo E, Li W. Flow velocity quantification in human coronary arteries with fast breath-hold MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:699-703.
2. Hundley WG, Clarke GD, Landau C, et al. Noninvasive determination of infarct artery patency by cine magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 1995;91:1347-1353.
3. Thomsen C, Cortsen M, Sondergaard L, Henriksen O, Stahlberg F. A segmented k-space velocity mapping protocol for quantification of renal artery blood flow during breath-holding. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:393-401.
4. Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, Friendman DP. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 1994;190:565-569.
5. Duerinckx A, Atkinson D, Hurwitz R. Assessment of coronary artery patency after stent placement using magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:896-902.
6. Hofman MBM, Van Rossum AC, Sprenger M, Sprenger M. Assessment of flow in the right human coronary artery by magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity measurement: effects of cardiac and respiratory motion. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:521-531.
7. Hundley WG, Lange RA, Clarke GD, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial flow and flow reserve in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1996;93:1502-1508.
8. Sakuma H, Blake LM, Amidon TM, et al. Coronary flow reserve: noninvasive measurement in humans with breath-hold velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:745-750.
9. Kern MJ, Moore JA, Aguire FV, et al. Determination of angiographic (TIMI grade) blood flow by intracoronary Doppler flow velocity during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;94:1545-1552.
10. Furber A, Lethimonnier F, Geslin P, et al. Flow velocity quantitation in coronary arteries: comparison between intravascular Doppler US and breath-hold MR angiography. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vancouver, 1997.
11. Luedeke KM, Roeschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343.
12. Ericsson A, Hemmingsson A, Jung B, Sperber GO. Calculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances. Phys Med Biol 1988;33:1103-1112.
13. Chauvel B, Cathelineau G, Balac S, Lecerf J, De Certaines JD. Cancellation of metal-induced MRI artifacts with dual-component paramagnetic and diamagnetic material: mathematical modelization and experimental verification. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6: 936-938.
14. Edelman RR. MR angiography: present and future. AJR 1993;161: 1-11.
15. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, et al. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR 1996;166:1337-1345.
16. Tang C, Blatter DB, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:377-385.