Assessment of coronary artery patency after stent placement using magnetic resonance angiography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 896-902

  Duerinckx, André J ^a,b   Atkinson, Dennis ^c   Hurwitz, Robert ^d  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^d HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac MRI; Coronary stent; Coronary vessel, MR; MR Angiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; STENT; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SAPHENOUS VEIN; STENTS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 0031848849     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080420     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Topol EJ. Caveats about elective coronary stenting (editorial). N Engl J Med 1994; 331(8):539-541.
2. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent study group). N Engl J Med 1994; 331:489-495.
3. Fishman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease (Stent Restenosis Study-STRESS). N Engl J Med 1994; 331:496-501.
4. Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakagawa Y, et al. Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:561-566.
5. Duerinckx AJ. Review: MR angiography of the coronary arteries. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 7(4):267-285.
6. Duerinckx AJ. Coronary MR angiography. In: Boxt LM, guest ed. Cardiac MR imaging. MRI Clinics of North America. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1996; 4 (2):361-418.
7. Duerinckx AJ. MRI of coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13(3):191-197.
8. Atkinson D, Edelman R. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breathhold with a segmented TurboFLASH sequence. Radiology 1991; 178:359-362.
9. Edelman R, Manning W, Burstein D, Paulin S. Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1991; 181(3): 641-643.
10. Manning WJ, Li W, Boyle NG, Edelman RE. Fat-suppressed breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation 1993; 87:94-104.
11. Manning W, Edelman R. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Magn Reson Q 1993; 9(3):131-151.
12. Pennell DJ, Keegan J, Firmin DN, Gatehouse PD, Underwood SR, Longmore DB. Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary arteries: technique and preliminary results. Br Heart J 1993; 70(4):315-326.
13. Bogaert J, Duerinckx AJ, Baert AL. Coronary MR angiography: a review. J Belge Radiol 1994; 77:255-261.
14. Duerinckx AJ, Bogaert J, Jiang H, Lewis BS. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery: diagnosis by coronary MR angiography (Case Report). Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:1095-1097.
15. Manning WJ, Li W, Cohen SI, Johnson RG, Edelman RR. Improved definition of anomalous left coronary artery by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Am Heart J 1995; 130(3 pt 1):615-617.
16. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Bronzwaer JGF, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries: a new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? Circulation 1995; 92:3163-3171.
17. McConnell MV, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, Li W, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Identification of anomalous coronary arteries and their anatomic course by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation 1995; 92:3158-3162.
18. Buser PT, Higgins CB. Coronary artery graft disease: diagnosis of graft failure by magnetic resonance imaging. In: Lüscher TF, Turina M, Braunwald E, eds. Coronary artery graft disease: mechanisms and prevention. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994; 99-112.
19. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:828-832.
20. Duerinckx AJ, Urman M. Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results. Radiology 1994; 193:731-738.
21. Nitatori T, Hanaoka H, Yoshino A, Tominaga M, et al. Clinical application of magnetic resonance angiography for coronary arteries: correlation with conventional angiography and evaluation of imaging time. Nippon Acta Radiol 1995; 55:670-676.
22. Pennell DJ, Bogren HG, Keegan J, Firmin DN, Underwood SR. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 1996; 75:127-133.
23. Mohiaddin RH, Bogren HG, Lazim F, et al. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipients. Coron Artery Dis 1996; 7(8):591-597.
24. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Hofman MB, de Cock CC, Valk J, Visser CA. Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 1997; 18(3):426-433.
25. Duerinckx AJ, Atkinson D, Hurwitz R, Mintorovitch J, Whitney W. Coronary MR angiography after coronary stent placement (case report). Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(3):662-664.
26. Hundley WG, Clarke GD, Landau C, et al. Noninvasive determination of infarct artery patency by cine magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 1995; 91:1347-1353.
27. Hofman MBM, van Rossum AC, Sprenger M, Westerhof N. Assessment of flow in the right human coronary artery by magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity measurements: effects of cardiac and respiratory motion. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:521-531.
28. Sakuma H, Blake LM, Amidon TM, et al. Coronary flow reserve: noninvasive measurement in humans with breath-hold velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 198:745-750.
29. Hundley WG, Lange RA, Clarke GD, Meshack BM, Payne J, Landau C, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial flow and flow reserve in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1996; 93:1502-1508.
30. Nath FC, Muller DW, Ellis SG, et al. Thrombosis of a flexible coil coronary stent: frequency, predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21(3):622-627.
31. Neumann FJ, Walter H, Richardt G, Schmitt C, Schomig A. Coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction. Heart 1996; 75(2):121-126.
32. Yamaoka O, Ikeno K, Fujioka H, et al. Detection of Palmaz-Schatz stent by ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19(1):128-130.
33. Nyman MA, Schwartz RS, Breen JF, Garratt KN, Holmes DR. Ultrafast computed tomographic scanning to assess patency of coronary artery stents in bypass grafts. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68:1021-1023.
34. Schmermund A, Haude M, Sehnert C, et al. [Noninvasive evaluation of the patency of coronary vessel stents using electron beam tomography segment images with administration of contrast media]. Z Kardiol 1995; 84(11):892-897.
35. Schmermund A, Haude M, Baumgart D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary Palmaz-Schatz stents by contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Eur Heart J 1996; 17(10):1546-1553.
36. Scott NA, Pettigrew RI. Absence of movement of coronary stents after placement in a magnetic resonance imaging field. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:900-901.
37. Reifart N, Massa T, Langer A, et al. Bail-out stenting following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. In: Boston-Scientific-Corporation, Liermann D, ed. Stents: state of the art and future developments. Morin Heights, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc., 1995; 93-99.
38. Labinaz M, Phillips R, Stack RS, Zidar JP, Brott B. The future of cardiologic stents. In: Boston-Scientific-Corporation, Liermann D, ed. Stents: state of the art and future developments. Morin Heights, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc., 1995; 394-399.
39. Mohiaddin RH, Roberts RH, Underwood R, Rothman M. Localization of a misplaced coronary artery stent by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cardiol 1995; 18(3):175-177.
40. Liermann D, Berkefeld J. Magnetic resonance examination of implanted endovascular prostheses in vessels: initial results. In: Boston-Scientific-Corporation, Liermann D, ed. Stents: state of the art and future developments. Morin Heights, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc., 1995; 386-393.
41. Teitelbaum GP, Raney M, Carvlin MJ, Matsumoto AH, Barth KH. Evaluation of ferromagnetism and magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of the tantalum vascular stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1989; 12:125-127.
42. Laissy JP, Grand C, Mator C, Struyven J, Berger JF, Schounan-Claeys E. Magnetic resonance angiography of intravascular endoprosthesis: investigation of three devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18:360-366.
43. Aurigemma G, Reichek N, Axel L, Schiebler M, Harris C, Kressel H. Noninvasive determination of coronary artery bypass graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1989; 80:1595-1602.
44. Rubinstein R, Askenase A, Thickman D, Feldman M, Agarwal J, Helfant R. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. Circulation 1987; 76(4):786-791.
45. DiRenzi P, Fedele F, DiCesare E, et al. Identification of coronary artery bypass grafts: reliability of MRI in clinical practice. Int J Card Imaging. 1992; 8:85-94.
46. White R, Caputo G, Mark A, Modin G, Higgins C. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164(3):681-686.