Fast approach for robot motion planning

Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 187-212

  Janabi Sharifi, F ^a   Wilson, W J ^b  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION AVOIDANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); INVERSE KINEMATICS; MOTION PLANNING; SIMULATED ANNEALING; VECTORS;

END-POINT MOTION PLANNING; JOINT TRAJECTORY PLANNING; PSEUDOINVERSE KINEMATICS;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 0032667032     PISSN: 09210296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008028507522     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baker, D. R., and Wampler, C. W.: Some facts concerning the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, March 1987, pp. 604-609.
2. Barraquand, J., and Latombe, J.-C.: Robot motion planning: A distributed representation approach, Int. J. Robotics Research 10(6) (1991), 628-649.
3. Barraquand, J., Langolis, B., and Latombe, J.: Numerical potential field techniques for robot path planning, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 22(2) (1992).
4. Guo, Y. Z., and Hsia, T. C.: Joint trajectory generation for redundant robots in an environment with obstacles, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, May 1990.
5. Janabi-Sharifi, F., Fakhry, H. H. H., and Wilson, W. J.: Integration of a robust trajectory planner with a feedforward neural controller for robotic manipulators, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, May 1994.
6. Janabi-Sharifi, F., and Wilson, W. J.: An intelligent assembly robotic system based on relative pose measurements, J. Intelligent Robotic Systems 11(1) (1995).
7. Janabi-Sharifi, F.: A supervisory intelligent robot control system for a relative pose-based strategy, PhD Dissertation, Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 1995.
8. Janabi-Sharifi, F.: A simple algorithm for nearest neighbor calculation in polyhedral environment, Technical Report 96-10, Center for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, December 1996.
9. Janabi-Sharifi, F. and Wilson, W. J.: Automatic grasp planning for visual-servo controlled robotic manipulators, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 28 B(5) (1998).
10. Johnson, D. S., Aragon, C. R., McGeoch, L. A., and Schevon, C.: Optimization by simulated annealing: an experimental evaluation; Part I: Graph partitioning, Oper. Res. 37(6) (1989).
11. Kavaraki, L. E., Švestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., and Overmars, M. H.: Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 12(4) (1996).
12. Khosla, P. and Volpe, R.: Superquadric artificial potentials for obstacle avoidance and approach, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA, 1988, pp. 1778-1784.
13. Kircanski, M. and Vukobratovic, M.: Contribution to control of redundant robotic manipulators in an environment with obstacles, Internat. J. Robotics Res. 5(4) (1986).
14. Kirkpatrick, S., Gellat, C. D., and Vecchi, M. P.: Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220(4598) (1983), 671-680.
15. Klein, C. A. and Blaho, B. E.: Dexterity measure for the design and control of kinematically redundant manipulators, Internat. J. Robotics Res. 6(2) (1987).
16. Koditschek, D. E.: Exact robot navigation by means of potential functions: Some topological considerations, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, March 1987.
17. Lewis, C. L. and Maciejewski, A. A.: Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators of locked joint failures, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 13(4) (1997), 622-629.
18. Lin, C.-H., Chang, P.-R., and Luh, J. Y. S.: Formulation and optimization of cubic polynomial joint trajectories for industrial robots, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 28(12) (1983).
19. Lozano-Pérez, T., Jones, J. L., Mazer, E., O'Donnell, P. A., Grimson, W. E. L., Tournassoud, P., and Lanusse, A.: Handey: A robot system that recognizes, plans and manipulates, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 843-849.
20. Mäntylä, M.: An Introduction to Solid Modeling, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1988.
21. Mayorga, R. V., Milano, N., and Wong, A. K. C.: A fast approach for manipulator inverse kinematics evaluation and singularities prevention, J. Robotics Systems 10(1) (1993).
22. Nakamura, Y. and Hanafusa, H.: Task priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators, in: H. Hanafusa and H. Inoue (eds), Robotics Research: 2nd Int. Sympos., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985, pp. 155-162.
23. Nakamura, Y. and Hanafusa, H.: Inverse kinematic solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator control, ASME Trans. Dyn. Systems Meas. Control 108 (September 1986).
24. Nakamura, Y.: Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991.
25. Necsulescu, D. S., Jassemi-Zargani, J., and Graham, W. B.: Impedance control for robotic manipulators, in: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Military Robotics Applications, Royal Military College, Kingston, ON, August 1989.
26. Rimon, E. and Koditschek, E.: The construction of analytic diffeomorphisms for exact robot navigation on star worlds, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 21-26.
27. Wampler, C. W.: Manipulator inverse kinematic solutions based on vector formulations and damped least-squares methods, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 16(1) (1986).
28. Yoshikawa, T.: Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, March 1985, pp. 1004-1009.