Sensitivity of the relationship matrix in quality function deployment

International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 214-223

  Shen, X X ^a   Tan, K C ^a   Xie, M ^a   Goh, T N ^a   Wang, H ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; TECHNICAL PRIORITY;

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

EID: 0032625608     PISSN: 10724761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chan, L.K. and Wu, M.L. (1998). Prioritizing the Technical Measures in Quality Function Deployment. Quality Engineering, 10: 467-479.
2. Chang, S.I. and Lin, S.Y. (1996). A Comparative Study and Design of EWMA Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variations in Short Run Productions. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 3, 268-278.
3. Cohen, L. (1995). Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. De Vera, D., Glennon, T., Kenny, A.A., Khan, M.A. H. and Mayer, M. (1988). An Automotive Case Study. Quality Progress, 21(6): 35-38.
5. Govers, C.P.M. (1996). What and How About Quality Function Deployment (QFD). International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47: 575-585.
6. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1992). Patterns of Communications Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing -A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams. Management Science, 38: 360-373.
7. Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D. (1988). The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3): 63-73.
8. Jain, V.K. and Bagchi, T.P. (1998). Competitiveness and TQM: The Synergy Should Be No Surprise. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 5: 182-187.
9. Kalargeros, N. and Gao, J.X. (1998). QFD: Focusing on its Simplification and Easy Computerization using Fuzzy Logic Principles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 19: 315-325.
10. Kathawala, Y. and Motwani, J. (1994). Implementing Quality Function Deployment: A System Approach. TQM Magazine, 6(6): 31-37.
11. Kim, K.-J. (1997). Determining Optimal Design Characteristic Levels in Quality Function Deployment. Quality Engineering, 10: 295-307.
12. Kogure, M. and Akao, Y. (1983). Quality Function Deployment and CWQC in Japan. Quality Progress, 16(10): 25-29.
13. McLaughlin, C.P. and Stratman, J.K. (1997). Improving the Quality of Corporate Technical Planning: Dynamic Analogues of QFD. R & D Management, 27: 269-279.
14. ReVelle, J.B., Moran, J.W. and Cox, C.A. (1997). The QFD Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15. Schmidt, R. (1997). The Implementation of Simultaneous Engineering in the Stage of Product Concept Development: A Process Oriented Improvement of Quality Function Deployment. European Journal of Operational Research, 100: 293-314.
16. Shin, J.S. and Kim, K.J. (1997). Restructuring a House of Quality using Factor Analysis. Quality Engineering, 9: 739-746.
17. Sivaloganathan, S. and Evbuomwan, N.F.O. (1997). Quality Function Deployment - The Technique: State of the Art and Future Directions. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 5: 171-180.
18. Sullivan, L.P. (1986). Quality Function Deployment. Quality Progress, 19(6): 39-50.
19. Wasserman, G.S. (1993). On How to Prioritize Design Requirements during the QFD Planning Process. IIE Transactions, 25: 59-65.
20. Wolfe, M. (1994). Development of the City of Quality: A Hypertext-based Group Decision Support System for Quality Function Deployment. Decision Support Systems, 11: 299-318.
21. Xie, M., Goh, T.N. and Wang, H. (1998). A Study of the Sensitivity of "Customer Voice" in QFD Analysis. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 5: 301-307.
22. Zairi, M. and Youssef, M. A. (1995). Quality Function Deployment: A Main Pillar for Successful Total Quality Management and Product Development. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(6): 9-23.
23. Zultner, R.E. (1993), Priorities: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in QFD. Transactions of the 5th Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, pp. 459-466.